Skip to main content

Influence of Weft Density on Runoff Erosion Control Performance of Rolled Erosion Control Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Traditional and Technical Textiles

Abstract

Rolled erosion control systems (RECSs) used in erosion control application mitigates runoff erosion through micro-barriers created by cross-laid weft yarns of RECS. Increase in number of cross-laid weft yarns (weft density) of RECSs is expected to improve its performance, so coir and jute RECSs with different weft density were prepared and evaluated for erosion control performance and germination performance. Runoff erosion test was performed in a bench-scale setup designed based on ASTM D 7101 standard, at zero and soil infiltration condition (with and without soil), at three different slope angles of 15°, 30°, and 45°. Whereas, germination test was performed using earthen pots and wheat seeds, based on ASTM D 7322 standard. Increased weft density resulted in improved performance of jute RECSs at all slope angles and infiltration condition, due to increased storage volume and better drapability. But the performance of coarser yarn count coir RECSs reduced at higher slope angle, due to increased flexural rigidity. In germination test, increase in weft density of finer yarn RECSs resulted in improved total rooting and percentage of vegetation, due to lower flexural rigidity and higher moisture holding. Whereas in coarser yarn RECSs, increase in weft density resulted in decreased total rooting and percentage of vegetation. It was also observed that the jute RECSs facilitates faster initial growth and highest total rooting as compared to coir RECSs due to finer and soft jute fibers that facilitate easy vegetation growth and better moisture-holding capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zuzel JF, Pikul JL (1993) Effects of straw mulch on runoff and erosion from small agricultural plots in northeastern Oregon. Soil Sci 156:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen SR (1996) Evaluation and standardization of rolled erosion control products. Geotext Geomembr 14:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutherland RA (1998a) A critical assessment of the research conducted at the hydraulics and erosion control laboratory—a focus on rolled erosion control systems applied to Hillslopes. Geotext Geomembr 16(2):87–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pimentel D (2006) Soil erosion; A food and environmental threat. J Environ Develop Sustain 8:117–119

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ogbobe O, Essien KS, Adebayo A (1998) A study of biodegradable geotextiles used for erosion control. Geosynthet Int 5(5):545–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hytiris N, McKay DJ, Addison PS (2001) A canopy flow equation for erosion control geosynthetics. Geosynthet Int 8(3):221–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanyal T (2006) Jute Geotextiles in erosion control & strengthening of sub-grades-two case studies. Indian Chap Int Geosynth Soc CBIP 298:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sanyal T, Khastagir AK, Choudhry PK (2013) Design and development of improved varities of open weave jute geotextiles for erosion control. Indian J Geosynthet Ground Improve 2:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sutherland RA (1998b) Rolled erosion control systems for hillslope surface protection: a critical review, synthesis and analysis of available data. I. background and formative years. Land Degrad Dev 9:465–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sutherland RA (1998c) Rolled erosion control systems for hillslope surface protection: a critical review, synthesis and analysis of available data. II. The post-1990 period. Land Degrad Dev 9:487–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Balan K (2004) Coir geotextiles- an eco-friendly material & Coir Geotextiles in watershed management and soil conservation. In Banerjee PK, Ramana GV, Shahu, JT, Rao GV (Eds), Geosynthetic new horizons. Asian books private limited, Papers of Geosynthetic India 2004 workshop held in New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhatia SK, Smith JL, Lake D, Walowsky D (2002) A technical and economic evaluation of geosynthetic rolled erosion control products in highway drainage channels. Geosynthet Int 9(2):125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutherland RA, Ziegler AD (2007) Effectiveness of coir-based rolled erosion control systems in reducing sediment transport from hillslopes. Appl Geogr 27:150–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gosh SK, Bhattacharyya R, Gupta KR (2015) Design and engineering of open weave jute soil saver for potential application in the field of soil erosion control and hill slope management. J Natural Fibers 12(6):561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Midha VK, Suresh KS (2013) Influence of woven structure on coir rolled erosion-control products. Geosynthet Int 20(6):396–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Midha VK, Suresh KS, Sharma A (2014) Performance of transesterified jute rolled erosion control products. Geosynthet Int 21(5):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalibová J, Jacka L, Petr˚u J (2016) The effectiveness of jute and coir blankets for erosion control in different field and laboratory conditions. J Solid Earth 7:469–479

    Google Scholar 

  18. State of environment—Atlas of India (State of Environment (SoE) Reports, 2011). https://www.soeatlas.org/Reports.aspx. Accessed 1 may 201

  19. Fan JC, Wu MF (2001) Sustaining the global farm. Effect of soil strength, texture, slope steepness and rain fall intensity on interrill erosion of soils. In: Taiwan, Mohtar RH, Steinhardt GC, Stott DE (Eds), Scientific content-Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, pp 588–593. Purdue University, Indiana, U.S (24–29 May 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shah DL, Shroff AV (2003) Soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. AA Balkema Publisher, Tokyo, Japan, pp 120–150

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner CMK, Laryea KB, Unger PW (1999) Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production, pp 7–41. US Department of Agriculture, Bushland, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cazzuffi D, Corneo A, Crippa E (2007) Slope stabilisation by perennial gramineae in Southern Italy: plant growth and temporal performance. Eco-Ground Bio-Eng 103:112–124

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blum A (2010) Plant Breeding for water- limited Environments. Springer Publishing, New York, USA, pp 12–44

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morgan RCP (2005) Soil erosion and conservation. Blackwell publishing ltd, Victoria, Australia, pp 11–42

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomson JC, Ingold TS (1986) Use of Jute Fabrics in Erosion Control. In: Report to the Jute Market Promotion Project: International Jute Organization. Geneva: UNCTAD/GATT

    Google Scholar 

  26. Desai AN, Ravi K (2016) Geotextile made from natural fibre. MK Robert, Editor, Geotextiles, Woodhead publishing Ltd. Cambridge, UK 2005:61–86

    Google Scholar 

  27. Coir Development Board (2010) Coir Bhoovastra—some thoughts of marketing promotion. Coir Development Board, Allpey, Kerala, India, Technical Papers Collected from Authorized Sources 2010:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  28. John NWM (1996) Geotextiles. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK, pp 78–85

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mathi PM (2005) Coir. Frank, R.R., Editor, Bast and other plant fibres, Woodhead publishing Ltd. Cambridge, UK 2005:274–314

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deb MK, Chakrabarti S (2010) Construction of an economic road using jute geo-textiles in flexible pavements-an experimental study. 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 8–12 November 2010. New Delhi, India, pp 879–886

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay Kumar Midha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Midha, V.K., Kumar, S.S. (2021). Influence of Weft Density on Runoff Erosion Control Performance of Rolled Erosion Control Systems. In: Midha, V., Mukhopadhyay, A. (eds) Recent Trends in Traditional and Technical Textiles. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9995-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics