Abstract
Liquefaction of soil significantly affects the life of buildings as well as the life of humans. Liquefaction develops when the shear strength of the soil is lesser to resist the shear stresses induced when subjected to dynamic loadings during vibration or an earthquake. In order to improve the load-bearing capacity so as to mitigate the liquefaction characteristics, the addition of chemicals in soil can also be used. Addition of chemicals can be done in two ways. The first method in which void spaces can be filled by grouting/stabilising material, whereas the second method is the mechanical stabilisation of external materials. The modifications of soil to upgrade its properties through grouting technologies are extensively popular these days. The present study is an attempt to study the non-conventional seismic liquefaction mitigation methods. Also, this study reviews the most significant laboratory tests with respect to liquefaction mitigation and compares colloidal silica with many other recent liquefaction mitigation techniques such as bentonite suspension grouting, bio-cementation, colloidal silica grout and sand–rubber tire shred mixtures. The current study revealed that the two main grouts, which can be used as a prospective liquefaction reduction materials in the upcoming era are colloidal silica and bentonite suspensions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Werner SD, Dickenson SE, Taylor CE (1997) Seismic risk reduction at ports: case studies and acceptable risk evaluation. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng 123(6):246–337
Mitchell JK, Baxter CDP, Munson TC (1995) Performance of improved ground during Earthquakes. In: Soil improvement for liquefaction hazard mitigation, Geotech special Pub No 49, ASCE, pp 1–36
Marcuson WF, Hadala PF, Ledbetter RH (1996) Seismic rehabilitation of earth dams. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122(1):7–20
Elias V, Welsh J, Wareen J, Lukas R, Collin J, Berg R (2006) Ground improvement methods: reference manual, vol I. NHI Course No 13204, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Mitchell JK (2008) Mitigation of liquefaction potential of silty sands. In: From research to practice in geotechnical engineering, ASCE, pp 433–451
Chu J, Varaksin S, Klotz U, Menge P (2009) Construction Process. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, IOS Press, Fairfax, VA, pp 3006–3135
Hazarika H, Yasuhara K, Kikuchi Y, Karmokar AK, Mitarai Y (2010) Multifaceted potentials of tire-derived three dimensional geosynthetics in geotechnical applications and their evaluation. Geotext Geomembranes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.10.011
Tafreshi SNM, Norouzi AH (2013) Bearing capacity of a square model footing on sand reinforced with shredded tire—an experimental investigation. Constr Build Mater (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.092
Madhusudhan BR, Boominathan A, Banerjee S (2017) Static and large-strain dynamic properties of sand-rubber tire shred mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002016
Bahadori H, Manafi S (2015) Effect of tyre chips on dynamic properties of saturated sands. Int J Phys Model Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.13.00014
Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2012) Dynamic properties of dry sand/rubber (SRM) and gravel/rubber (GRM) mixtures in a wide range of shearing strain amplitudes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.003
Brara A, Brara A, Daouadji A, Bali A, Daya EM (2017) Dynamic properties of dense sand-rubber mixtures with small particles size ratio. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1139509
Krishnan J, Shukla S (2019) The behaviour of soil stabilised with nanoparticles: an extensive review of the present status and its applications. Arab J Geosci 12:436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4595-6
Gallagher PM, Pamuk A, Abdoun T (2007) Stabilisation of liquefiable soils using colloidal silica grout. J Mater Civ Eng 19:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:1(33)
Consoli (2004) Effect of material properties on the behavior of sand-cement–fiber composites. Proc Inst Civ Eng Gr Improv 8:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1680/Grim.2004.8.2.77
Gallagher PM, Mitchell JK (2002) Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00126-4
Kodaka T, Oka F, Ohno Y, Takyu T, Yamasaki N (2005) Modeling of cyclic deformation and strength characteristics of silica treated sand. Geotech Spec Pub. https://doi.org/10.1061/40797(172)11
Díaz-Rodríguez JA, Antonio-Izarraras VM, Bandini P, López-Molina JA (2008) Cyclic strength of a natural liquefiable sand stabilized with colloidal silica grout. Can Geotech J 45:1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-072
Conlee CT, Gallagher PM, Boulanger RW, Kamai R (2012) Centrifuge modeling for liquefaction mitigation using colloidal silica stabilizer. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138:1334–1345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000703
Spencer L, Rix GJ, Gallagher P (2008) Colloidal silica gel and sand mixture dynamic properties. Geotech Earthq Eng Soil Dyn IV:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)101
Mohtar CSE, Bobet A, Santagata MC, Drnevich VP, Johnston CT (2013) Liquefaction mitigation using bentonite suspensions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000865
El Mohtar CS, Clarke J, Bobet A, Santagata M, Drnevich V, Johnston C (2008) Cyclic response of a sand with thixotropic pore fluid. Geotech Spec Pub. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)63
Salgado R, Bandini P, Karim A (2000) Shear strength and stiffness of silty sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(451)
Rugg DA, Yoon J, Hwang H, El Mohtar CS (2011) Undrained shearing properties of sand permeated with a bentonite suspension for static liquefaction mitigation. Geotech Spec Pub. https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)70
Yoon J, Mohtar CE (2013) Dynamic rheological properties of sodium pyrophosphate-modified bentonite suspensions for liquefaction mitigation. Clays Clay Miner. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2013.0610411
Montoya BM, DeJong JT, Boulanger RW (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Geotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.019
Burbank M, Weaver T, Lewis R, Williams T, Williams B, Crawford R (2013) Geotechnical tests of sands following bioinduced calcite precipitation catalysed by indigenous bacteria. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000781
Xiao P, Liu H, Stuedlein AW, Evans TM, Xiao Y (2019) Effect of relative density and biocementation on cyclic response of calcareous sand. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0573
Huang Y, Wen Z (2015) Recent developments of soil improvement methods for seismic liquefaction mitigation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1558-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krishnan, J., Shukla, S. (2021). Seismic Mitigation Liquefaction––An Extensive Study on New Concepts. In: Sitharam, T.G., Jakka, R., Govindaraju, L. (eds) Local Site Effects and Ground Failures. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 117. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9984-2_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9984-2_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9983-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9984-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)