Abstract
This article discusses the new round of healthcare reform in China. As usual, the analysis and interpretation are based on empirical facts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The following are the representative arguments I have read:
In 2003, professor WANG Shaoguang, at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, wrote that the deterioration of China’s public health is “probably related mainly to the two blind faiths that are looming in our overall reform thinking”. One is the blind faith in economic growth, and the other, in the market. According to WANG, “In the 1990s, the market economy was established as the target of reform; medical and healthcare services were gradually pushed to the market.” The end result is that “China’s healthcare field is probably one of the most market-oriented in the world” (see Crises and Opportunities in China’s Public Health. Comparison, Issue No. 7 [2003])
In 2005, an SCDRC research task force led by GE Yanfeng published a special report. After eulogizing “the outstanding achievements in China’s medical and health service during the planned economy”, the report points out that “the basic direction of the medical and health system since the reform is commercialization and marketization”, its negative consequences are “the decline in the fairness of medical services and the low efficiency of health investment”, and that “The root of the problem is that commercialization and marketization go against the basic rules for healthcare development” (see Evaluation of and Suggestions for China’s Healthcare Reform (Summary and Key Points). China Development Review, Supplementary Issue No. 1 [2005]).
In the same year, Professor LI Ling at Peking University also published an article, repeating WANG and GE’s opinions without citation. LI’s explanations were exactly the same: “The main reasons are government negligence and market failure. The government had no clear direction or goal for healthcare development, but irresponsibly left the healthcare to the market (see China Should Adopt a Government-Led Medical System. China and World Affairs, Issue No. 1 [2005]).
- 2.
For data and source, see Table 11.1.
- 3.
For data and source, see Table 11.1.
- 4.
Zhou (2008: 179–190).
- 5.
Jiang Yiwei (1980).
- 6.
Cao Haidong and Fu Jianfeng (2005).
- 7.
See the official website of WHO, http://www.who.int/topics/primary_health_care/alma_ata_declaration/zh/.
References
Haidong, Cao and Fu Jianfeng. 2005. Twenty Years of China’s Medical Reform. South Weekend, August 4.
Qiren, Zhou. 2008. Essays of Medical Care Reforms in China. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Yiwei, Jiang. 1980. The Enterprise-Oriented Theory. China Social Sciences (1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhou, Q. (2020). Health for All?—Debate on the New Round of Healthcare Reform in China. In: Property Rights and Changes in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9885-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9885-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9884-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9885-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)