Skip to main content

Adaptive Dynamic Inversion for Satellite Formation Flying

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Satellite Formation Flying
  • 597 Accesses

Abstract

The benefit of satellite formation flying can truly be realized with greater mission flexibility such as higher inter-satellite separation, formation in elliptic orbits, etc. However, under the above-enhanced conditions, linear system dynamics based control design approaches fail to achieve the desired objectives. Even though the LQR philosophy inspired the SDRE approach discussed in Chapter 3 offers a limited solution, it suffers from the drawback that the success of the approach largely depends on the typical state-dependent coefficient form one adopts (which remains as ‘art’). Moreover, if the eccentricity deviates significantly from circular orbit or separation distance requirement becomes large significantly, even SDRE can fail. The Adaptive LQR offers a fairly good solution to this issue, but introduces neural network learning concepts even for the system dynamics that is fairly known which can be handled directly. This brings in additional transients at the beginning of learning as well, which should preferably be avoided. In view of these observations, this chapter presents an alternate approach that need not be optimal, but can be successful under such realistic conditions as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Enns, D., D. Bugajski, R. Hendrick, and G. Stein. 1994. Dynamic inversion: An evolving methodology for flight control design. International Journal of control 59 (1): 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Slotine, J.J., and W. Li. 1991. Applied nonlinear control. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, B.S., and A.J. Calise. 1997. Nonlinear flight control using neural networks. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 20 (1): 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Padhi, R., S.N. Balakrishnan, and N. Unnikrishnan. 2007b. Model-following neuro-adaptive control design for non-square, non-affine nonlinear systems. IET Control Theory Application 1 (6): 1650–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Q., and R.F. Stengel. 2004. Robust nonlinear flight control of a high-performance aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 13 (1): 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marquez, H.J. 2003. Nonlinear control systems: Analysis and design, vol. 161, John Wiley Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahlil, H. 2002. Nonlinear systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Y., N. Sundararajan, and P. Saratchandran. 2001. Neuro-controller design for nonlinear fighter aircraft maneuver using fully tuned RBF networks. Automatica 37 (8): 1293–1301.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Padhi, R., and M. Kothari. 2007. An optimal dynamic inversion-based neuro-adaptive approach for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 87 (3): 208–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathavaraj, S., and R. Padhi. 2019. Optimally allocated nonlinear robust control of a reusable launch vehicle during re-entry. Unmanned Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rajasekaran, J., A. Chunodkar, and R. Padhi. 2009. Structured model-following neuro-adaptive design for attitude maneuver of rigid bodies. Control Engineering Practice 17 (6): 676–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cloutier, J. 1997. State-dependent Riccati equation techniques: An overview. In American Control Conference, vol. 2, 932–936. Air Force Armament Directorate, Eglin AFB, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen, D.H., and B. Widrow. 1990. Neural networks for self-learning control systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 10 (3): 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barto, A. 1984. Neuron-like adaptive elements that can solve difficult learning control-problems. Behavioural Processes 9 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanner, R.M., and J.-J.E. Slotine. 1991. Gaussian networks for direct adaptive control. In IEEE American Control Conference, 2153–2159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mathavaraj .

5.1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (zip 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mathavaraj, S., Padhi, R. (2021). Adaptive Dynamic Inversion for Satellite Formation Flying. In: Satellite Formation Flying. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9631-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9631-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9630-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9631-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics