Abstract
Critical development theories have increasingly been ignored in the international political economy over the last three decades. The purpose of this chapter is to explore the historical beginning of dependency theory, the world system theory and their core arguments that challenge neoliberal economic structure and core assumption of modernisation theories of development. By reviewing dependency theory and its variant ‘world system theory’, this chapter attempts to find out whether dependency theory can be regarded as an alternative in explaining the growing economic relationship between China and Africa. Dependency theory discusses both internal and external determinant of development and sheds a unique light on the realities of the South–South trade cooperation and in this context China–Africa relations. I discuss the inherence of dependency and argue that the theory provides a useful framework for research in the current context of China–Africa economic engagement. I argue that China in Africa is a potential replacement to the continent’s traditional trading partners and this may turn to be a shift for Africa from old dependency to a new one.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu, J., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1231–1294.
The African Development Bank. (2019). Rwanda Economic Outlook. https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/east-africa/rwanda/rwanda-economic-outlook.
Agbebi, M., & Virtanen, P. (2017). Dependency Theory—a Conceptual Lens to Understand China’s Presence in Africa? Forum for Development Studies, 44, 429–51.
Amadi, L. (2012). Africa: Beyond the “New” dependency: A political economy. Afr. J. Political Sci. Int. Relations, 6(8), 191–203.
Amanor, K. S. (2013). South-South Cooperation in Africa: Historical, Geopolitical andpolitical Economy Dimensions of International Development. IDS Bulletin, 44(4), 20–30.
Amin, S. (2011). Maldevelopment, Anatomy of a Global Failure. Cape Town: Pambazuka Press.
Amin, S., & Girvan, C. (1973). Underdevelopment and Dependence in Black Africa: Their Historical Origin and Contemporary Forms. Social and Economic Studies, 22(1), 177–196.
Amsden, A. H. (2003). Comment: Good-bye Dependency Theory, Hello Dependency Theory. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(1), 32–38.
Arrighi, G. (1990). The Developmentalist Illusion: A Reconceptualization of the Semiperiphery. In W Martin (Ed.), Semiperipheral States in the World Economy (pp. 18–25). Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Arrighi, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.
Arrighi, G. (2002). The African Crisis. New Left Review, 15, 5–36.
Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.
Arrighi, G. (2009, March/April).The Winding Paths of Capital. Interview by David Harvey, New Left Review, 56, 61–94.
BBC News. (2006). Mbeki Warns on China-Africa Ties. 14 December 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6178897.stm.
Blaney, D. L. (1996). Reconceptualizing Autonomy: The Difference Dependency Theory Makes. Review of International Political Economy. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177196.
Blaney, D. L. (2008). Reconceptualizing Autonomy: The Difference Dependency Theory Makes. Review of International Political Economy. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09692299608434365.
Bordoloi, S., & Das, R. J. (2017). Modernization Theory. In People, the Earth, Environment and Technology (pp. 1–14). New York: Wiley.
Brautingam, D. (2011). Aid “With Chinese Characteristics”: Chinese Foreign Aid and Development Finance meet the OECD-DAC Aid Regime. Journal of International Development, 23, 752–764.
Burawoy, M. (1992). The End of Sovietoloy and the Renaissance of Modernization Theory. Contemporary Sociology, 21(6), 774–785. www.jstor.org/stable/207562.
Campos, I., & Vines, A. (2008b). Angola and China: A pragmatic Partnership, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Washington, DC. http://www.csis.Org/media/csis/pubs/080306_angolachina.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 359–380.
Chernoff, F. (2005). The Power of International Theory: Reforging the Link to Foreign Policy-making Through Scientific Enquiry. Routledge.
Chirot, D., & Hall, T. D. (1982). World-system Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1), 81–106.
Di Muzio, T., & Robbins, R. H. (2016). Debt as Power. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dos Santos, T. (1998). The Structure of Dependence. In M. Seligson & J. T. Passe-Smith (Eds.), Development and Underdevelopment: The Political Economy of Equality. Colorado: Lynne Renner Publisher.
Erb, G. F., & Kallab, V. (Eds.). (1975). Beyond Dependency: The Developing World Speaks Out. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Felipe, J., & Vernengo, M. (2002). Demystifying the Principles of Comparative Advantage: Implications for Developing Countries. International Journal of Political Economy, 32(4), 49–75.
Ferraro, V. (2008). Dependency Theory: An Introduction. The Development Economics Reader, 12(2), 58–64.
Forbes, D. (1984). The Geography of Underdevelopment: A critical Survey. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.
Frank, A. G. (1966). The Development of Underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 17, 17–31.
Gordon, A. A., & Gordon, D. L. (Eds.). (2001). Understanding Contemporary Africa. London: Lynne Rienner.
Haq, M. (1976). The Poverty Curtain: Choices for the Third World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
IMF. (2007). What Drives China’s Growing Role in Africa (IMF Working Paper WP/07/211).
IMF (The International Monetary Fund). (2019a). Staff Report for the 2019 Article IV Consultation and Request for A Three-Year Policy Coordination Instrument––Press Release; Staff Report; And Statement By The Executive Director For Rwanda Report. IMF Country Report No. 19/21. July 2019. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2019/07/03/Rwanda-Staff-Report-for-2019-Article-IV-Consultation-and-a-Request-for-a-Three-Year-Policy-47089.
IMF (The International Monetary Fund). (2019b). Regional Economic Outlook Sub-Saharan Africa: Recovery Amid Elevated Uncertainty. April 2019. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/SSA/Issues/2019/04/01/sreo0419.
Kaufman, R., Chernotsky, H., & Geller, D. (1975). A Preliminary Test of the Theory of Dependency. Comparative Politics, 7(3), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/421222.
Larionova, M. (2020). Role of BRICS in the Global Economy. BRICS Informationportal. http://infobrics.org/post/31036/.
Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. F. (Eds.). (2007). Natural Resources, Neither Curse Nor Destiny. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Lubieniecka, E. (2015). Chinese Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa: Can the Beijing Consensus Be Explained Under World-Systems Analysis? Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(3), 433–50.
Mauldin, J. (2019). China’s Grand Plan To Take Over The World, Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2019/11/12/chinas-grand-plan-to-take-over-the-world/#5785e2ed5ab5.
Mlambo, V. (2019). Exploitation Dressed in a Suit, Shining Shoes, and Carrying a Suitcase Full of Dollars: What Does China Want in Africa? Journal of Public Affairs, 19(1), 1–9.
Moles, D. (1999). Dependencia and Modernization. https://dmoles.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/dependencia.pdf.
Moyo, D. (2009). Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is Another Way for Africa. London: Allen Lane.
O’Brien, P. J. (1975). A Critique of Latin American Theories of Dependency. In Ivar Oxaal, Tony Barnett, & David Booth (Eds.), Beyond the Sociology of Development: Economy and Society in Latin America and Africa. London: Routledge.
O’Brien, R., & Williams, M. (2020). Global Political Economy: Evolution and Dynamics (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Okowa, W. J. (1996). How the Tropics Underdeveloped the Negro: A Questioning Theory of Development. London: Paragraphics.
Olukoshi, D. (2017). Dependency Theory: Its Enduring Relevance, Dialogues on development, (Vol. 1).
Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.
Prebisch, R. (1968). Towards a Global Strategy of Development. New York: United Nations.
Prebisch, R. (1980). Raul Prebisch and the Origins of the Doctrine of Unequal Exchange. Latin American Research Review, 15(3), 45–72.
Radovanovic, M. (2012). Death of Dependency Theory? Significant of Dependency Theory in the contemporary world. University of Oslo, International Summer School International Development Studies.
Raine, S. (2009). China’s African Challenges. New York: Routledge.
Reitsma, H. J. (1980). Africa’s Land-Locked Countries: A Study of Dependency Relations. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 71(3), 130–141.
Rostow, W. (1959). The Stages of Economic Growth. The New Economic Review, 12(1), 1–16.
Sanchez, O. (2003). The Rise and Fall of the Dependency Movement: Does It Inform Underdevelopment Today? Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe, 14(2), 3–19. http://eial.tau.ac.il/index.php/eial/article/view/893.
Smith Andrew, P. (2010). Dependency Theories and the Icelandic Pension Crisis. Journal of Altrenative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 446–454.
So, A. S. (2010). The Dependency and World-Systems Perspectives on Development. In Charles Corthers (Ed.), Historical Developments and theoretical Approaches in Sociology (Vol. II, pp. 311–348). Ramsey, Isle of Man: Eolss Publishers Co.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 46. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications.
Taylor, I. (2007). Governance in Africa and Sino-African Relations: Contradictions or Confluence? Journal of Politics, 27(3), 139–146.
Thomas, C., & Wilkin, P. (2004). Still Waiting After All These Years: ‘The Third World’ on the Periphery of International Relations. Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 241–258.
Wallerstein, I. M. (1974). Dependence in an Interdependent World: The Limited Possibilities of Transformation within the Capitalist World Economy. African Studies Review, 17, (1), 1–26.
Wallerstein, I. M. (1988). Development: Lodestar or Illusion? Economic and Political Weekly, 23(39), 2017–2023.
Wallerstein, I. M. (2005). After Developmentalism and Globalization, What? Social Forces, 83(3), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0049.
The World Bank. (2019a). In 2017, Services Were the Main Driver of Economic Growth in BRICS. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. (English). https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/stories/services-drive-economic-growth.html
The World Bank. (2019b). Future Drivers of Growth in Rwanda: Innovation, Integration, Agglomeration, and Competition. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. (English). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/522801541618364833/pdf/131875-V1-WP-PUBLIC-Disclosed-11-9-2018.pdf
The World Bank. (2019c). Doing Business 2019 Fact Sheet: Sub-Saharan Africa. https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Fact-Sheets/DB19/FactSheet_DoingBusiness2019_SSA_Eng.pdf
The World Bank. (2019d). Rwanda Systematic Country Diagnostic. Report No. 138100-RW. June 25. World Bank Group. https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Fact-Sheets/DB19/FactSheet_DoingBusiness2019_SSA_Eng.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lisimba, A.F. (2020). Theoretical Understanding/Literature Review Dependency Theory. In: China’s Trade and Investment in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9573-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9573-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9572-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9573-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)