Abstract
There are countless religions in the world apart from the so-called world religions like Christianity, Islam and perhaps Buddhism. But, there is a fundamental division among these religions and this is the division between monotheistic religion and the religions that are polytheistic. Monotheistic religions like Christianity and Islam make a distinction between a world that is eternal and untouched by the contingencies of the world of humans—a world that is the ‘home’ of gods. Polytheistic religions on the other hand make no such stringent division between the world of gods and the human world. Gods are regular visitors to this world in all their physical reality and temporal here and now. The essay explores the crucial differences between the ethics that emanates from monotheism and ethics that is part of the spacio-temporal reciprocity of gods and humans of polytheism. My contention in this essay is that the ethics that is commensurate with polytheism is also commensurate with the secular perspective of human life. In this context, there will also be a discussion of Dharma and Dharmic ethics which addresses the volatility and contingencies of human life and the ethics that can address the challenges presented by them. Ethics of monotheism makes the truly moral life well-nigh impossible in this world while dharmic and polytheistic ethics are deeply embedded in the necessary spacio-temporal contingencies of this world.
I am indebted to Prof. Mrinal Miri for what I say in this essay. Some of the ideas in it emanates from an unpublished paper of his which I had the opportunity to read.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
na dharmādharmau carata āvam sva iti. na devagandharvā na pitara ity ācakṣate ‘yam dharmo ‘yam adharma iti’. (Āpastamba Dharma Sūtra 1.7.20.6.) (Pandeya 1969).
References
Doniger, W. (Ed.). (1991). The law of Manu. With an introduction and notes translated by Wendy Doniger with Brian K Smith. London: Penguin books.
Pandeya, U. C. (Ed.). (1969). Āpastamba Dharma Sūtra. Kashi Sanskrit Series (Vol. 93). Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Ramanujan, A. K. (1989). Is there an Indian way of thinking. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 23(1), 41–58.
Steiner, G. (1971). In Bluebeard’s castle: Some notes towards the redefinition of culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden With an Introduction by Bertrand Russell. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, A. (2021). Religious Pluralism and Ethics. In: Puri, B., Kumar, A. (eds) Re-thinking Religious Pluralism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9540-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9540-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9539-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9540-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)