Skip to main content

Cooperation and Conflict in India-China Relations: A Crisis of Confidence Building

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
India and China
  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

In the times of globalization and deglobalization, the question that has gained traction is how to manage conflict and maintain good neighbourly relations. Nations have relied on various confidence building measures (CBMs) or the crisis management mechanisms (CMMs) at bilateral, regional as well as multilateral levels. The CBMs, perhaps have not been fully explored in the case of India and China, even if these have been in place or are being negotiated have not been fully examined. More often than not, the interaction is perceived to be an example of adhocism that has led to negativity between the two; a series of stand-offs in 2013, 2014, especially the Doklam and Galwan in 2017 and 2020 point to this and that these have been violated and interpreted according to one’s convenience. This paper aims at studying the cooperation and crisis of confidence building between India and China and their impact on the overall relations. The case study of 1991, 1996, 2005 and 2012 CBMs provides a base for the theoretical discussion. The findings have led to some assumptions through which we could explain the cooperation and crisis management in the context of India and China. It concludes that the cooperation and crisis of confidence building are determined by various variables such as internal and external factors; economic and political factors; asymmetrical force structure and the power shift in the global power structure. The findings have acknowledged the role played by the CBMs in maintaining peace and tranquility along the border, however, the very violation of these will adversely impact the relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These are: 1. mutual respect for each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty; 2. mutual non-aggression; 3. non-interference in each other's internal affairs; 4. equality and mutual benefit and 5. peaceful co-existence.

  2. 2.

    These are 1. No Killing (Respect for life); 2. No Stealing (Respect for other’s property; 3. No Sexual Misconduct (Respect for our pure nature); 4. No Lying (Respect for honesty) and 5. No intoxicants (Respect for a clear mind).

References

  • Anthony, A. K. (2011). China has 58,000 kms of road network in TAR. In:  The Hindu, 7 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (1924). Tibet past and present, p. 60. London: Oxford University Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1996). The security Dilemma. In J. Davis. (Ed.), Security issues in the post-cold war world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention between Great Britain and China relating to Sikkim, available at https://treaties.fco.gov.uk/docs/pdf/1894/TS0011.pdf.

  • Dai, B. (2016). 《战略对话:戴秉国回忆录》 Strategic dialogue: Reminiscences of Dai Bingguo. Beijing: People’s Publishing House and World Knowledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepak, B. R. (2005). India and China 1904–2004: A century of peace and conflict. New Delhi: Manak Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepak, B. R. (2013). DOB faceoff: Some Chinese perceptions. Chennai Centre for China Studies C3S Paper No. 1150 dated 10 May 2013. https://www.c3sindia.org/china-internal/3600..

  • Deepak, B. R. (2020a). China won’t accept status quo ante. Sunday Guardian 4 July 2020. https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/china-wont-accept-status-quo-ante.

  • Deepak, B. R. (2020b). Death of LAC, CBMs between India and China.  Sunday Guardian 21 June 2020. https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/death-lca-cbms-india-china-2.

  • Giovanni, G. (2009). The Inter-polar world: A new scenario. Occasional Paper 79, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haass, R. N.  (2008). The age of non-polarity: What will follow US dominance. In: Foreign Affairs, 87(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P.  (1999). The lonely superpower. In: Foreign Affairs, 78(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R.  (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. In: World Politics, 30(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1999). Realism, neoliberalism, and cooperation: Understanding the debate. In: International Security, 24(1), 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, A. (1966). The McMahon Line, Volume I and II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2000). 《清史便年》 Annals of Qing dynasty. Beijing: Peoples University Press, Juan 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOFA [Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Royal Government of Bhutan] “Press Release” 29th June 2017 https://www.mfa.gov.bt/?p=4799; Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, “Recent Developments at Doklam Area.” https://mea.gov.in/press-releases.htm?dtl/28572/Recent+Developments+in+Doklam+Area

  • Panda, A. (2013). Comparing China's border agreement with India and the ADIZ. In: The Diplomat, 5 December 2013. https://thediplomat.com/2013/12/comparing-chinas-border-agreement-with-india-and-the-adiz/. Accessed on 30 May 2014.

  • Singh, S. (1998a). Three agreements and five principles. In: T. Chung. (Ed.), Across the Himalayan Gap, New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Gyan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (1998b). Building confidence with China. In: T. Chung. (Ed.), Across the Himalayan Gap, New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Gyan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (1998). 《喜马拉雅山情节:中印关系研究》 The Himalayas sentiment: A study of Sino Indian relations. Beijing: China Tibetology Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua. (2018). 《西藏“十三五”推进基建 发展新成果加速惠民》 Tibet's “13th Five-Year Plan advances infrastructure development”. 25 January 2018. https://m.xinhuanet.com/xz/2018-01/25/c_136923227.htm.

  • Yang, G. (1992). 《中国反对外国侵略干涉西藏地方斗争史》 History of China’s Struggle and Resistance to the Foreign Invasion and interference in Tibet. Beijing: China’s Tibetology Publications, pp. 73–74; QJWJS 《清季外交史料》 Sources on Diplomatic History of Late Qing Dynasty, Taipei: Wenhai Publishers (1964), 3(75), 214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Deepak, B.R. (2020). Cooperation and Conflict in India-China Relations: A Crisis of Confidence Building. In: India and China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9500-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9500-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9499-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9500-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics