Skip to main content

Comparison Between Chinese and Western Judge Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Legal Language and Culture

Part of the book series: Peking University Linguistics Research ((PKULR,volume 4))

  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

Ronald M. Dworkin, an American scholar, pointed out, “The court is the capital of the reich, the judge is the law of the princes”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atiyah, P.S. (1998). Law and modern society [M] (p. 12). Translated by Fan Yu et al. Dalian: Liaoning Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkin. (2005). Views on the Supervision of Justice by the Procuratorate [A]. In D. Cai (Ed.), Supervision and judicial justice: Research and case report [C] (p. 307). Beijing: Law Press, 2005: 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, P. & Wang, D. (2015). First established tenure system of judges [N]. Shenzhen Special Zone Daily (A03 Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. 2002. Study on Chinese judge system [D]. China University of Political Science and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W. (2014). A comparative study on the economic security of Chinese and American judges [J]. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 3, 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, S. (2013). China Is different [M] (p. 263). Beijing: China Development Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan C., & Guo, X. (2003). On the establishment of the exemption system of judges in China [J]. Journal of Law Application, 5, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, B. (2003). Study on court system reform [M] (p. 62). Beijing: People’s Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, F. (2012). Senior judge system and its enlightenment [J]. Shandong Justice, 1, 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, W. (2002). The significance and subject of judge culture [A] (p. 7). Copied Materials of Renmin University of China (Jurisprudence, Law History).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, O. (1981). Safeguard Judicial Independence [J]. Translation of law, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. (2012). Unified judicial examination and the training and selection of qualified legal personnel [J]. China Legal Science, 4, 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, D. (1984). The due process of law [M] (pp. 36, 50). Translated by Li Keqiang et al. Beijing: Mass Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osamiaf, & Fan, Y. (1999). Comparative law [M]. Law Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, L. (2000). Enlightenment of judicial knowledge of grass-roots judges [J]. Modern Law Science, 6, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W. (2012). Study on the protection of judges’ rights in China [D]. Changchun: Jilin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2014). The fundamental way to deal with the loss of judges [J]. Legal Information, 6, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2010). Investigation and reference of judge selection system in foreign countries [J]. Legal Forum, 5, 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2011). Review and innovation of judge selection system in China [J]. Contemporary Law Review, 4, 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, X., & Liu, Y. (2007). Judicial system of China [M] (p. 73). Beijing: Law Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, R. (2004). On American judges’ disciplinary system: Also the analysis of the differences between Chinese and American disciplinary ideas [J]. Law Review, 6, 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, J. (2008). Symbol of litigation ceremony [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College of P.R.C, 2008, (3), 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. (2003). China’s judge system framework: several issues on the construction of judges’ professionalization [M] (p. 16). Beijing: People’s Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. (1992). Judge culture and judicial justice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Social Science Edition), 1, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Falian Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Peking University Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, F. (2021). Comparison Between Chinese and Western Judge Culture. In: A Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Legal Language and Culture. Peking University Linguistics Research, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9347-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics