Abstract
The fragment molecular orbital (FMO) method has emerged as a powerful computational tool for structure-based drug design. Pair interaction energy decomposition analysis (PIEDA) enables detailed analysis of protein–ligand interactions, and many studies have shown that interaction energies can be used to predict protein–ligand binding affinities. However, the accuracy is insufficient for application to lead optimization. To increase the method’s accuracy, we introduce an ensemble FMO method in which molecular dynamics simulations are used to generate multiple protein–ligand complex structures, and FMO calculations are performed for ensembles of conformers with explicit water molecules. To assess the ensemble FMO method, we examined the correlations between experimental and calculated binding affinities of two systems, internal project A and Pim1 kinase. The correlations between experimental pIC50 values and FMO-based interaction energies in vacuo calculated based on MM-optimized X-ray crystal structures were R2 = 0.28 and R2 = 0.53 for internal project A and Pim1, respectively. Using the ensemble FMO method, the correlation for internal project A improved (R2 = 0.67), whereas the correlation for Pim1 was unchanged (R2 = 0.53). If combinations of different PIEDA energies were allowed, the best correlations for internal project A and Pim1 were R2 = 0.76 and R2 = 0.62, respectively. We also discuss the application of a reinforcement learning method, Best Arm Identification, in which the performance of the ensemble FMO method was maximized by avoiding unpromising compounds in the early stages to allocate limited computational resources to more-promising compounds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kitaura K, Sawai T, Asada T et al (1999) Pair interaction molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for molecular interactions. Chem Phys Lett 312:319–324
Kitaura K, Ikeo E, Asada T et al (1999) Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules. Chem Phys Lett 313:701–706
Nakano T, Kaminuma T, Satao T et al (2002) Fragment molecular orbital method: use of approximate electrostatic potential. Chem Phys Lett 351:475–480
Fedorov DG, Kitaura K (2007) Pair interaction energy decomposition analysis. J Comput Chem 28:222–237
Wlodawer A, Vondrasek J (1998) Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: a major success of structure-assisted drug design. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 27:249–284
Bagal SK, Andrews M, Bechle BM et al (2018) Discovery of potent, selective, and peripherally restricted Pan-Trk kinase inhibitors for the treatment of pain. J Med Chem 61:6779–6800
Bissantz C, Kuhn B, Stahl M (2010) A medicinal chemist’s guide to molecular interactions. J Med Chem 53:5061–5084
Fukuzawa K, Kitaura K, Uebayasi M et al (2005) Ab initio quantum mechanical study of the binding energies of human Estrogen receptor α with its ligands: an application of fragment molecular orbital method. J Comput Chem 26:1–10
Heifetz A, Chudyk EI, Gleave L et al (2016) The Fragment molecular orbital method reveals new insight into the chemical nature of GPCR−ligand interactions. J Chem Inf Model 56:159–172
Watanabe C, Watanabe H, Fukuzawa K et al (2017) Theoretical analysis of activity cliffs among Benzofuranone-class Pim1 inhibitors using the fragment molecular orbital method with molecular mechanics poisson-Boltzman surface area (FMO+MM-PBSA) approach. J Chem Inf Model 57:2996–3010
Lopes PEM, Guvench O, MacKerell AD (2015) Current status of protein force fields for molecular dynamics. Methods Mol Biol 1215:47–71
Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K et al (2015) ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3696–3713
Harder E, Damm W, Maple J et al (2016) OPLS3: a force field providing broad coverage of drug-like small molecules and proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 12:281–296
Ishikawa T, Kuwata K (2010) Interaction analysis of the native structure of prion protein with quantum chemical calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 6:538–547
Fedorov DG, Kitaura K (2018) Pair interaction energy decomposition analysis for density functional theory and density-functional tight-binding with an evaluation of energy fluctuations in molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem A 122:1781–1795
Auer P, Cesa-Bianchi N, Fischer P (2002) Finite-time analysis of multiarmed bandit problem. Mach Learn 47:235–256
Audibert J, Bubeck S, Munos R (2010) Best arm identification in multi-armed bandits. In: The 23rd annual conference on learning theory, dan Carmel hotel, Haifa, 27–29 June 2010
Gabillon V, Ghavamzadeh M, Lazaric A, Bubeck S (2011) Multi-bandit best arm identification. In: Twenty-fifth annual conference on neural information processing systems, Granada congress and exhibition centre, Granada, 12–17 December 2011
Sastry GM, Adzhigirey M, Day T et al (2013) Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J Comput Aid Mol Des 27:221–234
Salomon-Ferrer R, Case DA, Walker RC (2013) An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 3:198–210
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD et al (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935
Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW et al (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 25:1157–1174
Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI (2000) Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I method. J Comput Chem 21:132–146
Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI (2002) Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II parameterization and validation. J Comput Chem 23:1623–1641
Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA et al (1993) General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 14:1347–1363
Komeiji Y, Ishida T, Fedorov DG et al (2007) Change in a protein’s electronic structure induced by an explicit solvent: an ab initio fragment molecular orbital study of ubiquitin. J Comput Chem 28:1750–1762
Fukuzawa K, Kurisaki I, Watanabe C et al (2015) Explicit solvation modulates intra- and inter-molecular interactions within DNA: electronic aspects revealed by the ab initio fragment molecular orbital (FMO) method. Comput Theor Chem 1054:29–37
Huggins DJ, Sherman W, Tidor B (2012) Rational approaches to improving selectivity in drug design. J Med Chem 55:1424–1444
Terayama K, Iwata H, Araki M et al (2018) Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins. Bioinformatics 34:770–778
Gabillon V, Ghavamzadeh M, Lazaric A (2012) Best arm identification: a unified approach to fixed budget and fixed confidence. In: Twenty-sixth annual conference on neural information processing systems, Harrahs and Harveys, Lake Tahoe, 3–8 December 2012
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Kazufumi Ohkawa for thoughtful discussions and assistance in preparing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takaba, K. (2021). Application of FMO for Protein–ligand Binding Affinity Prediction. In: Mochizuki, Y., Tanaka, S., Fukuzawa, K. (eds) Recent Advances of the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9235-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9235-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9234-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9235-5
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)