Skip to main content

Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blockmate
  • 694 Accesses

Abstract

Ultrasound guidance technique currently represents the gold standard for regional anesthesia. In particular for lower extremity blocks, compared to anatomical landmark or localization technique with nerve stimulation, the ultrasound technique shows a modest improvement in block onset and quality. However, current literature lacks large size randomized trials and heterogeneity exist in various blocks. This chapter aims to present a comprehensive review of relevant applied anatomy of lower extremity, anatomical, and ultrasound-guided techniques for each block, and clinical implications of most commonly performed lower extremity blocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borghi B, D’Addabbo M, White PF, Gallerani P, Toccaceli L, Raffaeli W, et al. The use of prolonged peripheral neural blockade after lower extremity amputation: the effect on symptoms associated with phantom limb syndrome. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brull R, McCartney CJ, Chan VW, El-Beheiry H. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(4):965–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koh M, Markovich B. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, obturator nerve. [Updated 2019 Dec 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551640/.

  4. Giuffre BA, Jeanmonod R. Anatomy, sciatic nerve. [Updated 2020 Apr 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482431/.

  5. Sabnis AS. Anatomical variations of sciatic nerve bifurcation in human cadavers. J Clin Res Lett. 2012;3(2):46–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walji AH, Tsui BCH. Clinical anatomy of the sacral plexus. In: Tsui B, Suresh S, editors. Pediatric atlas of ultrasound- and nerve stimulation-guided regional anesthesia. New York, NY: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Touray ST, de Leeuw MA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Psoas compartment block for lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:750–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morimoto M, Kim JT, Popovic J, Jain S, Bekker A. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block for open reduction and internal fixation of hip fracture. Pain Pract. 2006;6(2):124–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein SM, D’Ercole F, Greengrass RA, Warner DS. Enoxaparin associated with psoas hematoma and lumbar plexopathy after lumbar plexus block. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1576–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weller RS, Gerancher JC, Crews JC, Wade KL. Extensive retroperitoneal hematoma without neurologic deficit in two patients who underwent lumbar plexus block and were later anticoagulated. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(2):581–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Visme V, Picart F, Le Jouan R, Legrand A, Savry C, Morin V. Combined lumbar and sacral plexus block compared with plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:158–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilfeld BM, Ball ST, Gearen PF, Le LT, Mariano ER, Vandenborne K, et al. Ambulatory continuous posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks after hip arthroplasty: a dual-center, randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(3):491–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amiri HR, Safari S, Makarem J, Rahimi M, Jahanshahi B. Comparison of combined femoral nerve block and spinal anesthesia with lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia in intertrochanteric fracture surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;2(1):32–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie H, Yang YX, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhao B, Luan B. Effects of continuous fascia iliaca compartment blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Pain Res Manag. 2015;20(4):210–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Newman B, McCarthy L, Thomas PW, May P, Layzell M, Horn K. A comparison of pre-operative nerve stimulator-guided femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block in patients with a femoral neck fracture. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(9):899–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jæger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(6):526–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Szđcs S, Morau D, Sultan SF, Iohom G, Shorten G. A comparison of three techniques (local anesthetic deposited circumferential to vs. above vs. below the nerve) for ultrasound guided femoral nerve block. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turbitt LR, McHardy PG, Casanova M, Shapiro J, Li L, Choi S. Analysis of inpatient falls after total knee arthroplasty in patients with continuous femoral nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(1):224–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morey TE, Giannoni J, Duncan E, Scarborough MT, Enneking FK. Nerve sheath catheter analgesia after amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:281–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aylinga OG, Montbriandb J, Jiang S, Ladak S, Love L, Eisenberg N, et al. Continuous regional anaesthesia provides effective pain management and reduces opioid requirement following major lower limb amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(5):559–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams PL, Bannister LH. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery. 38th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benzon HT, Sharma S, Calimaran A. Comparison of the different approaches to saphenous nerve block. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:633–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roamnes GJ, editor. Cunningham’s Textbook of anatomy. 12th ed. New York: Oxford Medical Publications; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  25. van der Wal M, Lang SA, Yip RW. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:542–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:578–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Head SJ, Leung RC, Hackman GP, Seib R, Rondi K, Schwarz SK. Ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block – Within versus distal to the adductor canal: a proof-of-principle randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsai PB, Karnwal A, Kakazu C, Tokhner V, Julka IS. Efficacy of an ultrasound-guided subsartorial approach to saphenous nerve block: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:683–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sahin L, Eken ML, Isik M, Cavus O. Comparison of infracondylar versus subsartorial approach to saphenous nerve block: a randomized controlled study. Anaesthesiology. 2017;11(3):287–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sztain JF, Khatibi B, Monahan AM, Said ET, Abramson WB, Gabriel RA, et al. Proximal versus distal continuous adductor canal blocks: does varying perineural catheter location influence analgesia? A randomized, subject-masked, controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(1):240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, et al. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis JJ, Bond TS, Swenson JD. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:618–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdallah FW, Whelan DB, Chan VW, Prasad GA, Endersby RV, Theodoropolous J, et al. Adductor canal block provides noninferior analgesia and superior quadriceps strength compared with femoral nerve block in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:1053–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Liu Y. Effectiveness of continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block in patients with total knee arthroplasty: a PRISMA guided systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(48):e18056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuang MJ, Ma JX, Fu L, He WW, Zhao J, Ma XL. Is adductor canal block better than femoral nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty? A GRADE analysis of the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(10):3238–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Leung P, Dickerson DM, Denduluri SK, Mohammed MK, Lu M, Anitescu M, Luu HH. Postoperative continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty improves pain and functional recovery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018;49:46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kayupov E, Okroj K, Young AC, Moric M, Luchetti TJ, Zisman G, et al. Continuous adductor canal blocks provide superior ambulation and pain control compared to epidural analgesia for primary knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(4):1040–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen J, Lesser JB, Hadzic A, Reiss W, Resta-Flarer F. Adductor canal block can result in motor block of the quadriceps muscle. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:170–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiesmann T, Piechowiak K, Duderstadt S, Haupt D, Schmitt J, Eschbach D, et al. Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty for mobilisation capability and pain treatment: a randomised and blinded clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(3):397–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Labat G. Regional anesthesia: its technique and clinical applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1928. p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beck GP. Anterior approach to sciatic nerve block. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:222–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Raj PP, Parks RI, Watson TD, Jenkins MT. A new single-position supine approach to sciatic-femoral nerve block. Anesth Analg. 1975;54:489–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chan VW, Nova H, Abbas S, McCartney CJL, Perlas A, Xu DQ. Ultrasound examination and localization of the sciatic nerve: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Graif M, Seton A, Nerubai J, Horoszowski H, Itzchak Y. Sciatic nerve: sonographic evaluation and anatomic-pathologic considerations. Radiology. 1991;181:405–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. di Benedetto P, Casati A, Bertini L, Fanelli G. Posterior subgluteal approach to block the sciatic nerve: description of the technique and initial clinical experiences. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19:682–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hadzic A, Vloka JD. Anterior approach to sciatic nerve block. In: Hadzic A, Vloka J, editors. Peripheral nerve blocks. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Taboada M, Rodríguez J, Valiño C, Vazquez M, Laya A, Garea M, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between the popliteal and subgluteal approaches for continuous sciatic nerve block with stimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):244–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. di Benedetto P, Casati A, Bertini L. Continuous subgluteus sciatic nerve block after orthopedic foot and ankle surgery: comparison of two infusion techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27(2):168–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Young DS, Cota A, Chaytor R. Continuous infragluteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7(4):271–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Taboada M, Alvarez J, Cortés J, Rodríguez J, Rabanal S, Gude F, et al. The effects of three different approaches on the onset time of sciatic nerve blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(1):242–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. YektaÅŸ A, Balkan B. Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Tammam TF. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block: a comparison between four different infragluteal probe and needle alignment approaches. J Anesth. 2014;28:532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cao X, Zhao X, Xu J, Liu Z, Li Q. Ultrasound-guided technology versus neurostimulation for sciatic nerver block: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(1):273–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Danelli G, Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Ortu A, Moschini E, Berti M, et al. The effects of ultrasound guidance and neurostimulation the minimum effective anesthetic volume of mepivacaine 1.5% required to block the sciatic nerve using the subgluteal approach. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1674–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tantry TP, Kadam D, Shetty P, Bhandary S. Combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for lower limb anaesthesia in anticoagulated patients with severe cardiac valvular lesions. Indian J Anaesth. 2010;54(3):235–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Li J, Deng X, Jiang T. Combined femoral and sciatic nerve block versus femoral and local infiltration anesthesia for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ota J, Sakura S, Hara K, Saito Y. Ultrasound-guided anterior approach to sciatic nerve block: a comparison with the posterior approach. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:660–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Barbero C, Fuzier R, Samii K. Anterior approach to the sciatic nerve block: adaptation to the patient’s height. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1785–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Singelyn FJ, Aye F, Gouverneur JM. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia after foot surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:383–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Perlas A, Brull R, Chan VW, McCartney CJ, Nuica A, Abbas S. Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Danelli G, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Moschini E, Rossi M, Ortu A, et al. Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:638–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Brull R, Macfarlane AJ, Parrington SJ, Koshkin A, Chan VW. Is circumferential injection advantageous for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block?: A proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:266–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Buys MJ, Arndt CD, Vagh F, Hoard A, Gerstein N. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa using a lateral approach: onset time comparing separate tibial and common peroneal nerve injections versus injecting proximal to the bifurcation. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:635–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Prasad A, Perlas A, Ramlogan R, Brull R, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block distal to sciatic nerve bifurcation shortens onset time: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Benzon HT, Kim C, Benzon HP, Silverstein ME, Jericho B, Prillaman K, et al. Correlation between evoked motor response of the sciatic nerve and sensory blockade. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:547–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vloka JD, Hadzic A, April E, Thys DM. Division of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa and its possible implications in the popliteal nerve blockade. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:215–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Monahan AM, Madison SJ, Loland VJ, Sztain JF, Bishop ML, Sandhu NS, et al. Continuous popliteal sciatic blocks: does varying perineural catheter location relative to the sciatic bifurcation influence block effects? A dual-center, randomized, subject-masked, controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(5):1689–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Lam NCK, Petersen TR, Gerstein NS, Yen T, Starr B, Mariano ER. A randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of ultrasound guidance versus nerve stimulation for lateral popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in obese patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(6):1057–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. van Geffen GJ, van den Broek E, Braak GJ, Giele JL, Gielen MJ, Scheffer GJ. A prospective randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided versus nerve stimulation guided distal sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ma HH, Chou TFA, Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, Chen WM. The efficacy and safety of continuous versus single-injection popliteal sciatic nerve block in outpatient foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):441.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Kerr DR, Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: a case study of 325 patients. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:174–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Gurava Reddy AV. Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28:1391–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Soares LG, Brull R, Chan VW. Teaching an old block a new trick: ultrasound-guided posterior tibial nerve block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:446–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Redborg KE, Sites BD, Chinn CD, Gallagher JD, Ball PA, Antonakakis JG, et al. Ultrasound improves the success rate of a sural nerve block at the ankle. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:24–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Doty R Jr, Sukhani R, Kendall MC, Yaghmour E, Nader A, Brodskaia A, Kataria TC, McCarthy R. Evaluation of a proximal block site and the use of nerve-stimulator-guided needle placement for posterior tibial nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhakar Subramani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Subramani, S., Punia, S. (2021). Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks. In: Chakraborty, A. (eds) Blockmate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9202-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9202-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9201-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9202-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics