Skip to main content

A Review of Automated Control Strategies of Blinds Considering Glare Prevention and Energy Saving

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2019)

Abstract

In recent years, a large number of studies have shown that shading devices have great potential in saving energy, improving indoor thermal comfort as well as preventing glare. As a passive strategy, the shading devices have great value to improve building performance sustainably. Appropriately, the shading control strategies can effectively utilize daylight in interior space that benefit an occupant’s health, well-being, and productivity by preventing glare and overheating while indoor lighting, cooling and heating loads are reduced. The venetian blinds are the most widely used in buildings at present due to its dynamically adjustable performance. Currently, more and more automatic venetian blinds control strategies have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of manual operation. It is also necessary to find the optimal shading control strategy to prevent indoor glare and to enhance the efficiency of energy saving. However, there is a lack of systematically review related to these research fields. This paper presents a review of the control strategies of the venetian blinds in various previous studies and analyzes the effects of different control strategies on indoor daylighting, glare prevention, thermal comfort and energy consumption. The review identifies current challenges and provides significant theoretical guidance for future research. At the same time, it also provides building design professionals with suggestive strategies and concepts of pre-shading design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heschong, L., Wright, R. L., & Okura, S. (2002). Daylighting Impacts on Human Performance in School. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 31(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodart, M., & De Herde, A. (2002). Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy and Buildings, 34, 421-429.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirimtat, A., et al. (2016). Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, M. V., Svendsen, S., & Jensen, L. B. (2011). Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight. Solar Energy, 85(5), 757–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Othman, A. R., & Khalid, A. A. M. (2013). Comparative performance of internal venetian blind and roller blind with respects to indoor illumination levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 542–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rea, M. S. (1984). Window blind occlusion a pilot study. Building and Environment, 19, 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain, S,, & Vishal, G. (2018). A review of open loop control strategies for shades, blinds and integrated lighting by use of real-time daylight prediction methods. Building and Environment, 135, 352–364.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, E.S., DiBartolomeo, D.L., Vine, E.L., & Selkowitz, S.E. (1998). Integrated performance of an automated venetian blind electric lighting system in a full-scale office environment. ASHIUWDOE/BIECCConference, TbenkalPerjortnance of the Exterior Envelopes of Buildings

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tzempelikos, A., & Athienitis, A. K. (2007). The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy, 81(3), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaiwiwatworakul, P., Surapong, C., & Pattana R. (2009). Application of automated blind for daylighting in tropical region. Energy Conversion and Management, 50(12), 2927–2943.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olbina, S., & Jia, Hu. (2012). Daylighting and thermal performance of automated split-controlled blinds. Building and Environment, 56, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song, L., & Ma, X. (2016). Strategy research of fuzzy control system for shutter. Moder Architecture Electric, 7(05), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, D. H. W., & Li, H. L. (2008). Classification of Hong Kong Prevailing Standard Skies. The Open Construction and Building Technology, 2, 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J.-H., et al. (2009). An experimental study on the environmental performance of the automated blind in summer. Building and Environment, 44(7), 1517–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DiBartolomeo, D. L., et al. (1997). Developing a dynamic envelope/lighting control system with field measurements. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 26(1), 146–164.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Borowczyński, A., Heim, D., & Szczepańska-Rosiak, E. (2015). Application of sky digital images for controlling of louver system. Energy Procedia, 78, 1769–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daum, D., & Morel, N. (2010). Identifying important state variables for a blind controller. Building and Environment, 45(4), 887–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yun, G., Park, D. Y., & Kim, K. S. (2017). Appropriate activation threshold of the external blind for visual comfort and lighting energy saving in different climate conditions. Building and Environment, 113, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunay, H. B., et al. (2017). Development and implementation of an adaptive lighting and blinds control algorithm. Building and Environment, 113, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karlsen, L., et al. (2016). Solar shading control strategy for office buildings in cold climate. Energy and Buildings, 118, 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koo, S. Y., Yeo, M. S., & Kim, K. W. (2010). Automated blind control to maximize the benefits of daylight in buildings. Building and Environment, 45(6), 1508–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, S., Dagnachew, B. (2012). An open-loop venetian blind control to avoid direct sunlight and enhance daylight utilization. Solar Energy, 86(3), 860–866.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hopkinson, R. G. (1972). Glare from daylighting in buildings. Journal Applied ergonomics, 3(4), 206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Iwata, T., & Tokura, M. (1998). Examination of the limitations of predicted glare sensation vote (PGSV) as a glare index for a large source: Towards a comprehensive development of discomfort glare evaluation. Lighting Research and Technology, 30(2), 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wienold, J., & Christoffersen, J. (2006). Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 743–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oh, M. H., Lee, K. H., & Yoon, J. H. (2012). Automated control strategies of inside slat-type blind considering visual comfort and building energy performance. Energy and Buildings, 55, 728–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Iwata, T., Taniguchi, T., & Sakuma, R. (2017). Automated blind control based on glare prevention with dimmable light in open-plan offices. Building and Environment, 113, 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Konstantzos, I., Tzempelikos, A., & Chan, Y.-C. (2015). Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades. Building and Environment, 87, 244–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Konstantzos, I., & Tzempelikos, A. (2017). Daylight glare evaluation with the sun in the field of view through window shades. Building and Environment, 113, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yun, G., Yoon, K. C., & Kim, K. S. (2014). The influence of shading control strategies on the visual comfort and energy demand of office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 84, 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu, J., & Olbina, S. (2011). Illuminance-based slat angle selection model for automated control of split blinds. Building and Environment, 46(3), 786–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Konstantoglou, M., & Tsangrassoulis, A. (2016). Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chan, Y.-C., & Tzempelikos, A. (2013). Efficient venetian blind control strategies considering daylight utilization and glare protection. Solar Energy, 98, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karlsen, L., Heiselberg, P., & Bryn, I. (2015). Occupant satisfaction with two blind control strategies: Slats closed and slats in cut-off position. Solar Energy, 115, 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, Y., et al. (2015). Development of a solar control method of the venetian blinds. Procedia Engineering, 121, 1186–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khang, L. E., Bourdais, R.,, Gueguen, H. (2014). Optimal control of shading system using hybrid model predictive. In: European Control Conference, pp. 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Le, K., Bourdais, R., & Guéguen, H. (2014). From hybrid model predictive control to logical control for shading system: A support vector machine approach. Energy and Buildings, 84, 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shen, E., Jia, Hu., & Patel, M. (2014). Energy and visual comfort analysis of lighting and daylight control strategies. Building and Environment, 78, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vine, E., Lee, E., Clear, R., DiBartolomeo, D., Selkowitz, S. (1998). Office worker response to an automated Venetian blind and electric lighting system: A pilot study. Energy and Buildings, 28, 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee, E. S., DiBartolomeo, D. L., Selkowitz, S. E. (1998). Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated Venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office. Energy and Buildings, 29, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mettanant, V., & Chaiwiwatworakul, P. (2014). Automated vertical blinds for daylighting in tropical region. Energy Procedia, 52, 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hui, X., & Jin, L. (2014). A study on the interior blinds control system based on fuzzy control algorithm. China Illuminating Engineering Journal, 25(02), 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Encai, L., & Yifei, C. (2008). Lighting fuzzy controller based on visual comfort indoors. China Instrumentation, 02, 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huai, Li., & Yifei, C. (2008). Research on indoor illuminance control system based on fuzzy neural network. Building Electricity, 07, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Čongradac, V., et al. (2012). Algorithm for blinds control based on the optimization of blind tilt angle using a genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic. Solar Energy, 86(9), 2762–2770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Guillemin, A., & Morel, N. (2001). An innovative lighting controller integrated in a self-adaptive building control system. Energy and Buildings, 33, 477–487.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Collins, B. L. et al. (1990). Second-level post-occupancy evaluation analysis. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 19(2), 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Meerbeek, B. W., et al. (2016). Automated blinds with light feedback to increase occupant satisfaction and energy saving. Building and Environment, 103, 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sadeghi, S. A., et al. (2016). Occupant interactions with shading and lighting systems using different control interfaces: A pilot field study. Building and Environment, 97, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Guillemin, A., & Molteni, S. (2002). An energy-efficient controller for shading devices self-adapting to the user wishes. Building and Environment, 37, 1091–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Grynning, S., Time, B., & Matusiak, B. (2014). Solar shading control strategies in cold climates—Heating, cooling demand and daylight availability in office spaces. Solar Energy, 107, 182–194.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Osterhaus, W. K. E. (2005). Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments. Solar Energy, 79(2), 140–158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shenghan Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, S., Deng, L. (2021). A Review of Automated Control Strategies of Blinds Considering Glare Prevention and Energy Saving. In: Ye, G., Yuan, H., Zuo, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2019. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_117

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics