Abstract
Metrology for atmospheric environment has assumed great importance for India as country aspires to undertake rapid sustainable economic growth for amelioration of living conditions of its citizens. The enhancement of economic activities impacts the status of environment which needs to be precisely & accurately monitored for formulation and undertaking of required policy measures. CSIR-NPL being the national metrology institute of India has started to develop capabilities for providing apex level traceability for atmospheric measurements. In this chapter, a detailed description is provided about the atmospheric species and properties for which testing and calibration facilities are required to be built in addition to the available test and calibration facilities for some of the atmospheric parameters. CSIR-NPL has undertaken development of various gas standards for providing SI traceability to pollution and greenhouse gas measurements in the country. Efforts have also been undertaken to cater to the national needs of testing and calibration of sensor-based monitoring systems for atmospheric/industrial pollution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Referencess
O.C. Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (World Meteorological Organization, 2007)
S. Singh, N.K. Lodhi, A.K. Mishra, S. Jose, S.N. Kumar, R.K. Kotnala, Assessment of satellite-retrieved surface UVA and UVB radiation by comparison with ground-measurements and trends over Mega-city Delhi. Atmos. Environ. 188, 60–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.027
W.L. Chameides, H. Yu, S.C. Liu, M. Bergin, X. Zhou, L. Mearns, G. Wang et al., Case study of the effects of atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity to enhance crop yields in China through emission controls? PNAS 96, 13626–13633 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.24.13626
S. Singh, S. Nath, R. Kohli, R. Singh, Aerosols over Delhi during pre-monsoon months: Characteristics and effects on surface radiation forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L13808 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023062
World Health Organization, Annual Report, 2005. No. WHO/MPS/07.01. (World Health Organization, 2006)
J.H. Seinfeld, S.N. Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change (Wiley, 2016)
M.O. Andreae, P.J. Crutzen, Atmospheric aerosols: biogeochemical sources and role in atmospheric chemistry. Science 276, 1052–1058 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052
V. Ramanathan, R.E. Dickinson, The role of stratospheric ozone in the zonal and seasonal radiative energy balance of the earth-troposphere system. J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 1084–1104 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036%3c1084:TROSOI%3e2.0.CO;2
M. Kampa, E. Castanas, Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollute. 151, 362–367 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
A.J. Haagen-Smit, C.E. Bradley, M.M. Fox, Ozone formation in photochemical oxidation of organic substances. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 2086–2089 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50525a044
J.H. Seinfeld, G.R. Carmichael, R. Arimoto, W.C. Conant, F.J. Brechtel, T.S. Bates, T.A. Cahill et al., ACE-ASIA: regional climatic and atmospheric chemical effects of Asian dust and pollution. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 85, 367–380 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-3-367
R.E. Dickinson, R.J. Cicerone, Future global warming from atmospheric trace gases. Nature 319, 109–115 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/319109a0
P. Matson, K.A. Lohse, S.J. Hall, The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio 31, 113–119 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.113
J.J. West, A. Cohen, F. Dentener, B. Brunekreef, T. Zhu, B. Armstrong, M.L. Bell et al., What we breathe impacts our health: improving understanding of the link between air pollution and health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4895–4904 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03827
R.J. Stening, Electron density profile changes associated with the equatorial electrojet. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 39, 157–164 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(77)90109-X
S. Sridharan, S. Sathishkumar, S. Gurubaran, Variabilities of mesospheric tides and equatorial electrojet strength during major stratospheric warming events. Ann. Geophys. 27, 4125–4130 (2009)
C. Vineeth, T.K. Pant, R. Sridharan, Equatorial counter electrojets and polar stratospheric sudden warmings-A classical example of high latitude-low latitude coupling. Ann. Geophys. 27, 3147–3153 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3147-2009
H.L. Liu, A.D. Richmond, Attribution of ionospheric vertical plasma drift perturbations to large-scale waves and the dependence on solar activity. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 2452–2465 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50265
T. Matsuno, A dynamical model of the stratospheric sudden warming. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 1479–1494 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028%3c1479:ADMOTS%3e2.0.CO;2
A.K. Upadhayaya, K.K. Mahajan, Ionospheric F2 region: variability and sudden stratospheric warmings. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 6736–6750 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50570
S. Gupta, A.K. Upadhayaya, Morphology of ionospheric F2 region variability associated with sudden stratospheric warmings. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 7798–7826 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024059
M. Dunajecka, S. Pulinets, Atmospheric and thermal anomalies observed around the time of strong earthquakes in Mexico. Atmosfera. 18, 235–247 (2005)
M.R.M. Daneshvar, M. Khosravi, T. Tavousi, Seismic triggering of atmospheric variables prior to the major earthquakes in the Middle East within a 12-year time-period of 2002–2013. Nat. Hazards. 74, 1539–1553 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1266-5
I. Mahmood, M.F. Iqbal, M.I. Shahzad, S. Qaiser, Investigation of atmospheric anomalies associated with Kashmir and Awaran Earthquakes. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 154, 75–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.12.018
H. Le, J.Y. Liu, L. Liu, A statistical analysis of ionospheric anomalies before 736 M6.0+ earthquakes during 2002–2010. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A02303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015781
S. Pulinets, M. Dunajecka, Specific variations of air temperature and relative humidity around the time of Michoacan earthquake M8. 1 Sept. 19, 1985 as a possible indicator of interaction between tectonic plates. Tectonophysics 431, 221–230 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.044
S. Pulinets, D. Ouzounov, Lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling (LAIC) model—an unified concept for earthquake precursors validation. J. Asian Earth Sci. 41, 371–382 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.005
F. Freund, Earthquake forewarning-A multidisciplinary challenge from the ground up to space. Acta Geophys. 61, 775–807 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0130-4
S.K. Sharma, T.K. Mandal, M. Saxena, Inter-annual variation of ambient ammonia and related trace gases in Delhi India B. Environ. Contam. Tox. 99, 281–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2058-x
S.K. Sharma, A. Datta, T. Saud, T.K. Mandal, Y.N. Ahammed, B.C. Arya, M.K. Tiwari, Study on concentration of ambient NH3 and interactions with some other ambient trace gases. Environ. Monit. Assess. 162, 225–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0791-2
R. Taipale, T.M. Ruuskanen, J. Rinne, M.K. Kajos, H. Hakola, T. Pohja, M. Kulmala, Quantitative long-term measurements of VOC concentrations by PTR-MS? measurement, calibration, and volume mixing ratio calculation methods. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 6681–6698 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6681-2008
S.K. Sharma, T.K. Mandal, C. Sharma, J.C. Kuniyal, R. Joshi, P.P. Dhyani, A. Sen et al., Measurements of particulate (PM 2.5), BC and trace gases over the northwestern Himalayan region of India. Mapan 29, 243–253 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0104-2
A. Sharma, T.K. Mandal, S.K. Sharma, D.K. Shukla, S. Singh, Relationships of surface ozone with its precursors, particulate matter and meteorology over Delhi. J. Atmos. Chem. 74, 451–474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-016-9351-7
J. Viallon, P. Moussay, R. Wielgosz, B.C. Arya, S.K. Mishra, A. Kumar, D.K. Shukla, J.E. Norris, F.R. Guenther. Final Report on the On-going Key Comparison BIPM.QM-K1: Ozone at Ambient Level, Comparison with NPLI, 2009. Metrologia 47, 08015 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-016-9351-7
https://www.airproducts.in/~/media/Files/PDF/homepage-EPC-World-Magazine-July-pg40-in.pdf
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4520300/india-industrial-gases-market-by-product-by
Report on 6th Meeting of CCQM, (2000), https://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/CCQM6-EN.pdf
https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CC/CCQM/CCQM1.pdf, CCQM Report on 1st meeting, BIPM, (1995)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/37/1/5 Alink, BIPM Com. Cons. Quan. Mat., progress report on comparison 96–12, 97–12, 99–12.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/37/1/5/pdf, A link, CCQM-key comparison on primary standard gas mixtures, BIPM com. Cons. Quan. Mat. Report 99 (revised)
A. Alink, The first key comparison of primary standard gas mixtures. Metrologia 37, 35–49 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/37/1/5
Final Report, CCQM-K120 a & b; Carbon dioxide in Air at background level (380–480) µmol/mol and at urban level (480–800) µmol/mol https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/final_reports/QM/K120/CCQM-K120.pdf
APMP.QM-S9.2017 Draft A report Comparison of measurement capability with 100 µmol/mol of Carbon monoxide in nitrogen. https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/final_reports/QM/S9/APMP.QM-S9.pdf
Draft B Report International Comparison APMP.QM-S7.1 Methane in nitrogen at 2000 μmol/mol
A. Alink et al., Final report for the Key Comparison CCQM-K1.b, (1999). https://kcdb.bipm.org/appendixb/appbresults/ccqm-k1.d/ccqm-k1_final_report.pdf.
A. van der Veen et al., CCQM key comparison CCQM-K3 of measurements of CO, CO2, and C3H8 in N2. Metrologia 39, 121 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/39/1/18
L.A. Konopelko et al., COOMET.QM-K3: automotive emission gas measurements. Metrologia 44, 08005 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/44/1A/08005
A.M.H. Van der Veen, J.I.T. Van Wijk, R.P. Van Otterloo, R.M. et al, EUROMET. QM-K3: automotive emission gas measurements. Metrologia39, 08005 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/39/1A/23
J.S. Kim, D.M. Moon, K. Kato, M. Maruyama, M.J. Kao, A. Botha, M. Dimashki, APMP. QM-K3: automotive emission gas measurements. Metrologia 40, 08009 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/40/1A/08009
APMP.QM-S15, Draft A report, Comparison of measurement capability with 1000 µmol/mol of Carbon dioxide in nitrogen.
S.G. Aggarwal, Recent developments in aerosol measurement techniques and the metrological issues. Mapan 25, 165–189 (2010)
S.G. Aggarwal, S. Kumar, P. Mandal, B. Sarangi, K. Singh, J.Pokhariyal, S.K. Mishra, S. Agarwal, D. Sinha, S. Singh, C. Sharma, P.K. Gupta, Traceability issue in PM 2.5 and PM 10 measurements. Mapan 28, 153–166 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-013-0073-x
Y.H. Cheng, C.J. Tsai, Evaporation loss of ammonium nitrate particles during filter sampling. J. Aerosol Sci. 28, 1553–1567 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00033-5
S.E. Shin, C.H. Jung, Y.P. Kim, Analysis of the measurement difference for the PM10 concentrations between beta-ray absorption and gravimetric methods at Gosan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 11, 846–853 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.04.0041
M.B. Ranade, M.C. Woods, F.L. Chen, L.J. Purdue, K.A. Rehme, Wind tunnel evaluation of PM10 samplers. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 13, 54–71 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959424
C.J. Tsai, A field study of three collocated ambient PM10 samplers. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 12, 10–15 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19950120103
W. John, W. Winklmayr, H.C. Wang, Particle deagglomeration and reentrainment in a PM10 sampler. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 14, 165–176 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829108959480
Z. Meng, J.H. Seinfeld, P. Saxena, Y.P. Kim, Contribution of water to particulate mass in the south coast air basin. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 22, 111–123 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959731
C. Pilinis, J.H. Seinfeld, D. Grosjean, Water content of atmospheric aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 23, 1601–1606 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90419-8
S.G. Aggarwal, M. Mochida, Y. Kitamori, K. Kawamura, Chemical closure study on hygroscopic properties of urban aerosol particles in Sapporo. Japan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6920–6925 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/es063092m
S.E. Shin, C.H. Jung, Y.P. Kim, Estimation of the optimal heated inlet air temperature for the beta-ray absorption method: analysis of the PM10 concentration difference by different methods in coastal areas. Adv. Environ. Res. 1, 69–82 (2012)
K. Shukla, R. Agarwal, P. Patel, K. Singh, D. Soni, P. Johri, S.G. Aggarwal, V.K. Jain, Some Preliminary Results of Particulate Matter Metrology. (IJAPC, vol XX, No. 1–2, March and September 2020.)
I. Mori, Z. Sun, M. Ukachi, K. Nagano, C.W. McLeod, A.G. Cox, M. Nishikawa, Development and certification of the new NIES CRM 28: urban aerosols for the determination of multielements. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 391, 1997–2003 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2076-y
https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/gas-sensors-market-size
Nicola Donato, Mariangela Latino and Giovanni Neri, in Carbon nanotubes, ed. By Stefano Bianco (IntechOpen Limited, London, 2011) p. 229
C. Wang, L. Yin, L. Zhang, D. Xiang, R. Gao, Metal oxide gas sensors: sensitivity and influencing factors. Sensors 10, 2088 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/s100302088
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Ms. Beena Gupta, Mrs. Saroj Gandhi, Mr. Alok Mukherjee, Dr. Khem Singh, Ms. Smriti Tiwari Singh, Mr. Devesh Kumar Shukla, Mr. Lalit Goswami, Mr. Jitender Kumar, Ms. Abha Shukla, Mr. M.L. Arora, Mr. Suresh Chandra Yadav, Mr. Saket Vihari and Ms. Kamla for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, C. et al. (2020). Metrology for Atmospheric Environment. In: Aswal, D.K. (eds) Metrology for Inclusive Growth of India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8872-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8872-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8871-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8872-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)