Advertisement

SeaCities pp 191-216 | Cite as

The Relation Between Coastal Flood Risk and Ecosystem Services Affecting Coastal Tourism: A Review of Recent Assessments

Chapter
  • 108 Downloads
Part of the Cities Research Series book series (CRS)

Abstract

It is widely accepted by the scientific community that coastal cities are considered the most vulnerable urban areas. Future climate change scenarios and impacts are expected to exacerbate coastal flood risk with ecological and economic influence on the ecosystem services and human activities as coastal tourism. In this context, the aim of this chapter, reviewing recent research, is to explore the state of the art on the vulnerability of coastal zones, mainly due to the risk of “great floods”, and the potential adaptation of coastal tourism to address this issue in the face of climate change. The perspective of this review analysis is to deepen the interrelations among climate change and flood risk related to coastal ecosystem services and their impacts on coastal tourism. Particularly, by conducting a systematic review focused on Australian and European regions, the present study examines the emergent themes about these topics while addressing the need to deal with an integrated approach. We searched two academic literary databases and identified 16 studies that met the selection criteria for this review. Findings highlighted that relatively few studies had analysed the interrelationships between these issues, showing a research gap both from a regional geographic coverage and from a strategy perspective. Emergent themes of the recent studies reviewed here could help to discover critical features and future research axes for more resilient coastal urban communities.

References

  1. Aitali R, Snoussi M, Kasmi S (2020) Coastal development and risks of flooding in Morocco: the cases of Tahaddart and Saidia coasts. J Afr Earth Sci 164:103771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfieri L, Feyen L et al (2015a) Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios. Glob Environ Change 35:199–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2015.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfieri L, Burek P et al (2015b) Global warming increases the frequency of river floods in Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(5):2247–2260.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2247-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aroca-Jiménez E et al (2018) A quantitative methodology for the assessment of the regional economic vulnerability to flash floods. J Hydrol 565:386–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2018.08.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berndtsson R et al (2019) Drivers of changing urban flood risk: a framework for action. J Environ Manage 240(October 2018):47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caro C, Pinto R, Marques JC (2018) Use and usefulness of open source spatial databases for the assessment and management of European coastal and marine ecosystem services. Ecol Indicators 95(June):41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper JAG, O’Connor MC, McIvor S (2020) Coastal defences versus coastal ecosystems: a regional appraisal. Marine Policy 111:102332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Van Coppenolle R, Temmerman S (2019) A global exploration of tidal wetland creation for nature-based flood risk mitigation in coastal cities. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 226(June):106262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Van Coppenolle R, Temmerman S (2020) Identifying global hotspots where coastal wetland conservation can contribute to nature-based mitigation of coastal flood risks. Global Planet Change 187(December 2019):103125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coppola T (2020) Artificial surfing reefs : the right solution for Vagueira beach? Università degli Studi di TorinoGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanza R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260. Available at: https://www-nature-com.ezproxy.royalroads.ca/articles/387253a0.pdf
  12. de Ruig LT et al (2019) A micro-scale cost-benefit analysis of building-level flood risk adaptation measures in Los Angeles. Water Resour Econ 100147. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2019.100147
  13. Debele SE et al (2019) Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases. Environ Res 179(June):108799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799
  14. Drius M et al (2019) Tackling challenges for Mediterranean sustainable coastal tourism: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci Total Environ 652:1302–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.10.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dwyer L, Forsyth P, Dwyer W (2020) Tourism economics and policy, 2nd edn. Channel View Publ, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2019) The EU blue economy report. Luxemburg.  https://doi.org/10.2771/2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang J et al (2020) Coastal flood risks in China through the 21st century—an application of DIVA. Sci Total Environ 704:135311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.135311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrote J et al (2019) Civil engineering works versus self-protection measures for the mitigation of floods economic risk. A case study from a new classification criterion for cost-benefit analysis. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc 37:101157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graff K et al (2019) Analysis and quantification of potential consequences in multirisk coastal context at different spatial scales (Normandy, France). Nat Hazards 99(2):637–664.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03763-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grames J et al (2016) Modeling the interaction between flooding events and economic growth. Ecol Econ 129:193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant MJ, Booth A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J 26(2):91–108.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haer T et al (2017) Economic evaluation of climate risk adaptation strategies: cost-benefit analysis of flood protection in Tabasco, Mexico. Atmósfera 30(2):101–120. doi:  https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.2017.30.02.03
  23. Hérivaux C et al (2018) Benefits of adapting to sea level rise: the importance of ecosystem services in the French Mediterranean sandy coastline. Reg Environ Change 18(6):1815–1828.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1313-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirabayashi Y et al (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Change 3(9):816–821.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2019) Summary for policymakers. In: Pörtner H-O et al (eds) IPCC Special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. In press. doi: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/spm.html
  26. Kundzewicz ZW et al (2019) Flood risk in a range of spatial perspectives—from global to local scales. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19(7):1319–1328.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1319-2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lavorel S et al (2017) Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches. Ecol Ind 74:241–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2016.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li S et al (2015) Vulnerability assessment of the coastal mangrove ecosystems in Guangxi, China, to sea-level rise. Reg Environ Change 15(2):265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0639-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lichter M et al (2011) Exploring data-related uncertainties in analyses of land area and population in the “Low-Elevation Coastal Zone” (LECZ). J Coastal Res 757–768.  https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-10-00072.1
  30. Liquete C et al (2013) Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 8(7).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067737
  31. López-Dóriga U et al (2019) Impact of sea-level rise on the tourist-carrying capacity of Catalan beaches. Ocean Coast Manag 170(December 2018):40–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.12.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19(1):17–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807076960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehvar S et al (2018) Quantifying economic value of coastal ecosystem services: a review. J Mar Sci Eng 6(1).  https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6010005
  34. Merkens JL et al (2016) Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob Planet Change 145:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Milly PCD et al (2002) Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415(6871):514–517.  https://doi.org/10.1038/415514aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mora C et al (2018) Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nat Clim Change 8(12):1062–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0315-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris RL et al (2018) From grey to green: Efficacy of eco-engineering solutions for nature-based coastal defence. Glob Change Biol 24(5):1827–1842.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morris RL et al (2019) Developing a nature-based coastal defence strategy for Australia. Aust J Civil Eng 17(2):167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2019.1661062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moscardo G et al (2001) Understanding coastal and marine tourism demand from three european markets: implications for the future of ecotourism? J Sustain Tour 9(3):212–227.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580108667399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neumann B et al (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLOS ONE 10(3):1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicholls RJ (2002) Analysis of global impacts of sea-level rise: a case study of flooding. Phys Chem Earth 27(32–34):1455–1466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00090-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ogato GS et al (2020) Geographic information system (GIS)-Based multicriteria analysis of flooding hazard and risk in Ambo Town and its watershed, West shoa zone, oromia regional State, Ethiopia. J Hydrol: Regional Stud 27:100659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oppenheimer M et al (2019) Sea level rise and implications for low lying Islands, coasts and communities. In: Pörtner H-O et al. (eds) IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. In press, pp 126–129.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6284
  44. Plan Blue (2016) Tourism. Economic activities and sustainable development. Plan Bleu Notes, No. 32Google Scholar
  45. Plieninger T et al (2018) Identifying and assessing the potential for conflict between landscape values and development preferences on the Faroe Islands. Glob Environ Change 52(May):162–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pueyo-Ros J et al (2018) Ecological restoration of a coastal wetland at a mass tourism destination. Will the recreational value increase or decrease?. Ecological Economics. 148(January 2017):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.002
  47. Reed D et al (2020) Modeling wetland transitions and loss in coastal Louisiana under scenarios of future relative sea-level rise. Geomorphology 352:106991.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rehan BM (2018) Accounting public and individual flood protection measures in damage assessment: a novel approach for quantitative assessment of vulnerability and flood risk associated with local engineering adaptation options. J Hydrol 563:863–873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richins H, Pearce P (2000) Influences on tourism development decision making: coastal local government areas in eastern Australia. J Sustain Tour 8(3):207–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580008667359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roebeling PC et al (2013) Ecosystem service value losses from coastal erosion in Europe: historical trends and future projections. J Coastal Conserv 17(3):389–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-013-0235-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sadiq AA, Tyler J, Noonan DS (2019) A review of community flood risk management studies in the United States. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc 41(July):101327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanchez-Reaza J, Carletto A (2013) Resilient coastal cities: the economic, social and environmental dimensions of risk. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Sangha KK et al (2019) A state-wide economic assessment of coastal and marine ecosystem services to inform sustainable development policies in the Northern Territory, Australia. Marine Policy 107(June):103595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scholz M (2013) Water quality improvement performance of geotextiles within permeable pavement systems: a critical review. Water 5(2):462–479.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w5020462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott D, Hall CM, Gössling S (2019) Global tourism vulnerability to climate change. Ann Tour Res 77(June):49–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simmonds J, Gómez JA, Ledezma A (2019) The role of agent-based modeling and multi-agent systems in flood-based hydrological problems: a brief review. J Water Clim Change.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2019.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thompson RR, Garfin DR, Silver RC (2017) Evacuation from natural disasters: a systematic review of the literature. Risk Anal 37(4):812–839.  https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tisdell C, Wilson C (2012) Nature-based tourism and conservation. In: Elgar E (ed) Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  59. Toimil A et al (2018) Estimating the risk of loss of beach recreation value under climate change. Tour Manag 68(April):387–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toimil A et al (2020) Addressing the challenges of climate change risks and adaptation in coastal areas: a review. Coastal Eng 156:103611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COASTALENG.2019.103611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vormoor K et al (2016) Evidence for changes in the magnitude and frequency of observed rainfall vs. snowmelt driven floods in Norway. J Hydrol 538:33–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2016.03.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vousdoukas MI et al (2016) Projections of extreme storm surge levels along Europe. Clim Dyn 47(9):3171–3190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3019-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams AT et al (2018) The management of coastal erosion. Ocean Coastal Manage 156:4–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winsemius HC et al (2016) Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat Clim Change 6(4):381–385.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.University of TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations