Abstract
In recent decades, several participatory tools and techniques have been introduced in disaster risk management. These tools vary from each other at great extent in terms of their structure, function, scope, facilitation process, required time and resources and so on; however, the sole objective of all of them is to ensure effective involvement of local communities in disaster risk management. If involving community in the decision-making process is simple and unidimensional, then one particular tool would be enough to ensure the objective. However, the multifaceted nature of community participation, the variety of ways to operationalize them and its numerous untested claims have created enormous confusion amongst researchers and practitioners to put the idea into practice. There is urgent need to systematically define the objectives of the community-based disaster risk management and examine how and what extent the participatory tools can ascertain those objectives. To address these issues, this study introduces a participatory flood risk mapping exercise in Mumbai, India. In this study, we unraveled how and what extent the participatory flood risk mapping exercise is effective to achieve the critical parameters of good participation. Thereafter, local community themselves evaluated the success of the participatory risk mapping to ascertain various participation yardsticks. This study is one of the pioneering works in identifying the factors accountable for effective public participation in disaster management and to validate them empirically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35(4):216–224
Bajek R, Matsuda Y, Okada N (2008) Japan’s Jishu-bosai-soshiki community activities: analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management. Nat Hazards 44(2):281–292
Bhagat RB, Guha M, Chattopadhyay A (2006) Mumbai after 26/7 deluge: issues and concerns in urban planning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-006-0028-z. Retrieved from https://www.springerlink.com
Bohra AK, Basu S, Rajagopal EN, Iyengar GR, Das-Gupta M, Ashrit R, Athiyaman B (2006) Heavy rainfall episode over Mumbai on 26 July 2005: assessment of NWP guidance. Current Sci 90(9):1188–1194
Cadag JRD, Gaillard JC (2012) Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction: the contribution of participatory mapping. Area 44(1):100–109
Chess C, Purcell K (1999) Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environ Sci Technol 33(16):2685–2692
Chingombe W, Pedzisai E, Manatsa D, Mukwada G, Taru P (2015) A participatory approach in GIS data collection for flood risk management, Muzarabani district Zimbabwe. Arab J Geosci 8(2):1029–1040
Cronin SJ, Petterson MG, Taylor PW, Biliki R (2004) Maximising multi-stakeholder participation in government and community volcanic hazard management programs; a case study from Savo Solomon islands. Nat Hazards 33(1):105–136
Gaillard JC, Pangilinan MLCJD (2010) Participatory mapping for raising disaster risk awareness among the youth. J Contingencies Crisis Manage 18(3):175–179
Gaillard JC, Maceda EA (2009) Participatory three-dimensional mapping for disaster risk reduction. Participatory Learn Action 60(1):109–118
Government of Maharashtra (2006) Report of the Fact Finding Committee (FFC) on Mumbai Floods
Gupta K (2007) Urban flood resiliency planning and management and lessons for the future: a case study of Mumbai. Urban Water J 4(27):183–194
Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2007) Volcanic hazard communication using maps: an evaluation of their effectiveness. Bull Volcanol 70(2):123–138
Liu W, Dugar S, McCallum I, Thapa G, See L, Khadka P, Shakya P (2018) Integrated participatory and collaborative risk mapping for enhancing disaster resilience. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7(2):68
Na J, Okada N, Fang L (2009) A collaborative action development approach to improving community disaster reduction by the Yonmenkaigi workshop method. J Nat Disaster Sci 30:57–69
Newig J, Kochskämper E, Challies E, Jager NW (2016) Exploring governance learning: how policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning. Environ Sci Policy 55:353–360
Okada N, Na JI, Fang L, Teratani A (2013) The Yonmenkaigi system method: an implementation-oriented group decision support approach. Group Decis Negot 22(1):53–67
Osti R, Tanaka S, Tokioka T (2008) Flood hazard mapping in developing countries: problems and prospects. Disaster Prevent Manage Int J 17(1):104–113
Parthasarathy D (2009) Social and environmental insecurities in Mumbai: towards a sociological perspective on vulnerability. South African Rev Sociol 40(1)
Pasupuleti R (2012) Towards an interdisciplinary framework for understanding the role of culture in the post disaster reconstruction process: the case of tsunami reconstruction in Tamilnadu, southern India. In: International disaster and risk conference: global risk forum, pp 565–568
Pasupuleti RS (2013) Designing culturally responsive built environments in post disaster contexts: tsunami affected fishing settlements in Tamilnadu, India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:28–39
Renn O, Webler T, Rakel H, Dienel P, Johnson B (1993) Public participation in decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sci 26(3):189–214
Reichel C, Frömming UU (2014) Participatory mapping of local disaster risk reduction knowledge: an example from Switzerland. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5(1):41–54
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 25(1):3–29
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values 30(2):251–290
Samaddar S, Okada N (2006) Participatory approach for post-earthquake reconstruction in the villages of Kachchh, India. Ann Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ B 49:197–205
Samaddar S, Misra BA, Chatterjee R, Tatano H (2011) Participatory risk mapping for identifying spatial risks in flood prone slum areas, Mumbai. Ann Disaster Prevent Res Inst Kyoto Univ 54B:137–146
Samaddar S, Chatterjee R, Misra BA, Tatano H (2011b) Identifying vulnerability pattern in a flood prone micro-hotspot of Mumbai, India. In: 2011 2nd international conference on environmental science and development, IPCBEE, vol 4
Samaddar S, Misra BA, Chatterjee R, Tatano H (2012) Understanding community’s evacuation intention development process in a flood prone micro-hotspot Mumbai. IDRiM J 2(2):89–107
Samaddar S, Misra BA, Tatano H (2012b) Flood risk awareness and preparedness: the role of trust in information sources. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, pp 3099–3104
Samaddar S, Chatterjee R, Misra B, Tatano H (2014) Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy: reasons or results of flood preparedness intention? Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 8:91–99
Samaddar S, Yokomatsu M, Dayour F, Oteng-Ababio M, Dzivenu T, Adams M, Ishikawa H (2015) Evaluating effective public participation in disaster management and climate change adaptation: insights from northern Ghana through a user-based approach. Risk Hazards Crisis Publ Pol 6(1):117–143
Samaddar S, Choi J, Misra BA, Tatano H (2015) Insights on social learning and collaborative action plan development for disaster risk reduction: practicing Yonmenkaigi system method (YSM) in flood-prone Mumbai. Nat Hazards 75(2):1531–1554
Samaddar S, Okada N, Choi J, Tatano H (2018) What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat. India. Nat Hazards 85(1):111–138
Samaddar S, Ayaribilla AJ, Oteng-Ababio M, Dayour F, Yokomatsu M (2019) Stakeholders’ perceptions on effective community participation in climate change adaptation. In: Sustainable solutions for food security. Springer, Cham, pp 355–379
Samodra G, Chen G, Sartohadi J, Kasama K (2018) Generating landslide inventory by participatory mapping: an example in Purwosari Area, Yogyakarta, Java. Geomorphology 306:306–313
Tatano H, Samaddar S (2010) Flood risks reduction in livelihood risks: thoughts and insights from Mumbai. Ann Disaster Prevent Res Inst Kyoto Univ 53B:105–114
Tran P, Shaw R, Chantry G, Norton J (2009) GIS and local knowledge in disaster management: a case study of flood risk mapping in Viet Nam. Disasters 33(1):152–169
Webler T (1995) Right discourse in public participation: an evaluative yardstick. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds) Fairness and competence in public participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 35–86
White I, Kingston R, Barker A (2010) Participatory geographic information systems and public engagement within flood risk management. J Flood Risk Manage 3(4):337–346
Yadav M, Desai G (Year not mentioned) Transforming habitats: case study of Mumbai. Available at https://www.mumbaidp24seven.in/reference/30.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Samaddar, S., Tatano, H., Pasupuleti, R.S. (2021). Evaluating the Success of Participatory Flood Risk Mapping—A Case Study from Dharavi, Mumbai. In: Tatano, H., Collins, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Global Summit of Research Institutes for Disaster Risk Reduction. GSRIDRR 2017. Disaster and Risk Research: GADRI Book Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8662-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8662-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8661-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8662-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)