Skip to main content

Methodological Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary China’s Land Use Policy
  • 275 Accesses

Abstract

this chapter includes a discussion about the data collection and methodology that will be applied to each research objective. Section 4.1 provides a detailed research design that targets each research objective and helps answer the proposed research questions. Section 4.2 introduces the case study area and is followed by the data collection process described in Sect. 4.3, which includes the questionnaire design and the fieldwork conducted in the case study area. Lastly, Sect. 4.4 presents the methodologies adopted for achieving each research objective of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 CNY = 0.15 USD.

References

  • Bailey, L. E. (2010). Case study research. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies (pp. 104–105). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blouin, D., Day, A. G., & Pavlov, A. (2011). Comparative reliability of structured versus unstructured interviews in the admission process of a residency program. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 3(4), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-10-00248.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interview. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1008–1010). New York: Springer, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Britten, N. (2007). Qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research in Health Care, Third Edition, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Pan, R., & Xiao, H. (2016). Ezhou model of land quota transaction under the Link Policy. China Land(2), 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., Shi, K., & Niu, C. (2016). A comparison of the means and ends of rural construction land consolidation: Case studies of villagers’ attitudes and behaviours in Changchun City, Jilin province, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating public policy. Chicago, Ill.: Nelson Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Given, L. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubei Statistic Bureau. (2016). 2015 Ezhou economic and social development statistics report. Retrieved from http://www.stats-hb.gov.cn/wzlm/tjgb/ndtjgb/ezs/ezs/108974.htm.

  • Islam, M. D. M., & Faniran, O. O. (2005). Structural equation model of project planning effectiveness. Construction Management and Economics, 23(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000301384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, G. (2011). Policy evaluation. In Bertrand Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 1908–1917). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H. (2012). Integrating urban and rural development. Economic Daily. Retrieved from http://paper.ce.cn/jjrb/html/2012-03/01/content_193508.htm.

  • Liu, W., Yang, X., Zhong, S., Sissoko, F., & Wei, C. (2017). Can community-based concentration revitalise the upland villages? A case comparison of two villages in Chongqing, Southwestern China. Habitat International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.005.

  • Meyer, C. B. (2001). A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13(4), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0101300402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1985). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: Sage Newbury Park,, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819201900101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative inquiry, 17(6), 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., & Mannering, F. (2010). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolraich, M. L., Dworkin, P. H., Drotar, D. D., & Perrin, E. C. (2007). Developmental-behavioral pediatrics: Evidence and practice (1st ed.). Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, N., & Xu, X. (2013). Ezhou model for integrating urban and rural development. Hubei Daily. Retrieved from http://hbrb.cnhubei.com/HTML/hbrb/20130512/hbrb2039000.html.

  • Yanow, D. (1999). Conducting interpretive policy analysis (Vol. 47). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, California: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Wen, Y., Wang, R., & Han, W. (2018). Factors influencing rural households’ willingness of centralized residence: Comparing pure and nonpure farming areas in China. Habitat International, 73, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Cheng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, L. (2021). Methodological Issues. In: Contemporary China’s Land Use Policy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8331-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics