Skip to main content

Watershed Prioritization in GIS: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Climate Action and Water Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences ((AGES))

  • 340 Accesses

Abstract

Various Soil and Water Conservation (SWC) measures are widely implemented to reduce the surface runoff in the degraded and drought-prone watersheds. However, their implementation requires thorough assessment of morphometric and hydrological parameters prevailing in the watershed. This research was conducted to characterize the sub-watersheds for SWC in a drought-prone watershed of Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra using morpho-metric analysis in GIS domain. Their prioritization has been carried out using two different Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approaches viz. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for a comparative assessment. The findings were further supplemented based on the severity of surface processes, quantitative estimation of soil erosion and surface runoff derived using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The priority value obtained using the AHP and TOPSIS ranged from 1.452–2.658 to 0.215–0.586, respectively. The comparison based on normalized values from the two approaches, shows similar results for the 73% of sub-watersheds and slight variation in the remaining. However, surface runoff and soil erosion-based prioritization carried out using SWAT have been found to have slightly better semblance with the TOPSIS model as compared to that of AHP. The study concludes that though the morphometric analysis and MCDA is and continue to remain the most widely used tool for watershed characterization, supplementing them with the hydrological inputs derived from SWAT provides a more effective approach for planning SWC measures at a local level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Murthy YK, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manage 27(10):3555–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009) Identification of spatial ranking of hydrological vulnerability using multi-criteria decision making techniques: case study of Korea. Water Resour Manag 23(12):2395–2416

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW, Arnold JJ, Srinivasan R, Reyes M (2010) The worldwide use of the SWAT Model: Technological drivers, networking impacts, and simulation trends. In: 21st century watershed technology: improving water quality and environment conference proceedings, 21–24 February 2010, Universidad EARTH, Costa Rica. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath G, Nair AG, Ambili GK, Swetha TV (2016) Watershed prioritization based on morphometric analysis coupled with multi criteria decision making. Arab J Geosci 9(2):129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 58–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Ghosh NC, Galkate RV, Thomas T (2015) Multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for watershed prioritization. In: Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold JG (2010) ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT 2009—User’s Guide. GSWR Agricultural Research Service & Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R (2009) Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(2):261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson SK (1991) Applications of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models. Hydrol Process 5(1):31–44

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Julius JJ, Singh D, Brema J (2017, October) Morphometric analysis of linear and areal aspects of bhagirathi river basin—A GIS approach. In: 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). IEEE, pp. 549–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wong DW (2010) Effects of DEM sources on hydrologic applications. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34(3):251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster KJ (2002) Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions. Water Resour Res 38(4):13–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parupalli S, Padma Kumari K, Ganapuram S (2019) Assessment and planning for integrated river basin management using remote sensing, SWAT model and morphometric analysis (case study: Kaddam river basin, India). Geocarto Int 34(12):1332–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel DP, Nandhakumar N (2016) Runoff potential estimation of Anjana Khadi Watershed using SWAT model in the part of lower Tapi Basin, West India. Sustain Water Resour Manag 2(1):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. Kobe, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Stec A, Zeleňáková M (2019) An analysis of the effectiveness of two rainwater harvesting systems located in Central Eastern Europe. Water 11(3):458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water and FAO (2007) Coping with water scarcity: challenge of the 21st century. UN-Water and FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stutee Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gupta, S., Pendkar, R., Sarala, C., Reddy, K.M. (2021). Watershed Prioritization in GIS: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches. In: Mishra, R.K., Singh, R.B., Dubey, A. (eds) Sustainable Climate Action and Water Management. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8237-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics