Abstract
The demand for various sources of energy is unpredictably escalating in an astonishing rate. Conventional energy sources have started declining at a tremendous rate due to this increased demand. Environmentalists have started worrying about the future and have initiated many steps in order to fulfill present demands and also make sure that we do not compromise with the upcoming generations. Solar energy, one of the clean form energies found till date, is still a researchable topic among all scholars. Photovoltaic arrays use MPPT techniques in order to achieve high power even at undesirable environmental conditions. This helps the arrays to operate in the MPP region more often. This paper presents a case study of application of dragonfly algorithm, a recently developed swarm intelligence algorithm, inspired by the static and dynamic swarming behaviors of dragonflies, to maximum power point tracking (MPPT), to improve the efficiency of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. The search for more techniques to tap solar energy has been a thirst among various researchers around the world. A conventional MPPT algorithm, incremental conductance method, was utilized for comparison with dragonfly algorithm in this paper. The results were evaluated and compared under different testing conditions, such as partial shading conditions. It was observed that dragonfly algorithm outperforms incremental conductance method and improves system efficiency. The dragonfly algorithm also seems to have an upper hand over other conventional methods as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bialasiewicz JT (2008) Renewable energy systems with photovoltaic power generators: operation and modeling. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2752–2758
Hamid MR, Rahimi J, Chowdhury S, Sunny TMM (2016) Design and development of a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) charge controller for photo-voltaic (PV) power generation system. Am J Eng Res (AJER) 15–22
Nguyen D, Lehman B (2008) An adaptive solar photovoltaic array using model-based reconfiguration algorithm. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2644–2654
Trishan E, Chapman PL (2007) Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques. IEEE Trans Energ Convers 22:439–449
Lokanadham M, Bhaskar KV (2012) Incremental conductance based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) for photovoltaic systems. Int J Eng Res Appl 1420–1424
Patel US, Sahu D, Tirkey D (2013) Maximum power point tracking using perturb & observe algorithm and compare with another algorithm. Int J Dig Appl Contemp Res 2(2)
Femia N, Petrone G, Spagnuolo G, Vitelli M (2005) Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method. IEEE Trans Power Electron 963–973
Thongam DM, Jaiswal N (2015) Analysis of PV array solar energy using advanced Hill Climbing controller. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res (IJSETR) 4(4)
Wu Y, Shen C, Wu C (2009) Research and improvement of maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems. In: International conference on power electronics and drive systems (PEDS), pp 1308–1312
Mirjalili S (2015) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1
Tan Y, Shi Y, Niu B (2016) Advances in swarm intelligence. In 7th international conference, ICSI 2016, Bali, Indonesia, June 25–30, 2016, Proceedings, Part I. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41000-5
Raman GR, Raman GP, Manickam C, Ilango G (2016) Dragonfly algorithm based global maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic systems. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), pp 211–219
Rani Balasubramanian I, Ilango G, Chilakapati N (2014) Impact of partial shading on the output power of PV systems under partial shading conditions. Power Electron IET 7:657–666
Hussein KH, Muta Itsuya, Hoshino Tsutomu, Osakada M (1995) Maximum photovoltaic power tracking: an algorithm for rapidly changing atmospheric conditions. Gener Transm Distrib IEE Proc 142:59–64
Patel H, Agarwal V (2008) Maximum power point tracking scheme for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55(4):1689–1698
Liu Y-H, Chen J-H, Huang J-W (2015) A review of maximum power point tracking techniques for use in partially shaded conditions. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 41:436–453
Kotak VC, Tyagi P (2013) DC to DC converter in maximum power point tracker. Int J Adv Res Electr Electron Instrum Eng (IJAREEIE) 2(12)
Arulmurugan R, Suthanthira Vanitha N (2012) Optimal design of DC to DC boost converter with closed loop control PID mechanism for high voltage photovoltaic application. Int J Power Electron Drive Syst (IJPEDS) 2088–8694
Shanthi T, Gounden NA (2007) Power electronic interface for grid-connected PV array using boost converter and line-commutated inverter with MPPT. In: International conference on intelligent advanced systems, pp 882–886
Umashankar S, Srikanth P, Vijay Kumar D, Kothari DP (2011) Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms with DC-DC converters for solar PV system. Int J Electr Comput Eng 11–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: Technical Specifications of Solar Panel, Boost Converter and Partial Shading Patterns
Appendix A: Technical Specifications of Solar Panel, Boost Converter and Partial Shading Patterns
This model of PV system that is implemented in this project is the Kyocera KC200GT. The panel specifications are given Table 2 as follows:
Solar Panel Specifications
The solar panel specifications are as follows.
Boost Converter Specifications
The boost converter specifications are as follows (Table 3).
Partial Shading Specifications
Two solar panels are implemented with different irradiation values to simulate partial shading conditions:
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chitra, A., Manathara, A., Sivaramakrishnan, K., Razia Sultana, W., Sreejith, S. (2021). Performance Comparison of Conventional IC and Dragonfly-Based MPPT for Solar PV Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions. In: Komanapalli, V.L.N., Sivakumaran, N., Hampannavar, S. (eds) Advances in Automation, Signal Processing, Instrumentation, and Control. i-CASIC 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 700. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8221-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8221-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8220-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8221-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)