Skip to main content

Energy Release Rate Evaluation of Bi-material Interface Cracks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Lightweight Materials and Structures

Abstract

Fracture analysis of crack growth in between two material interfaces (different engineering materials) is one of the challenging tasks in the engineering field. In the present investigation, different properties of bi-material are considering to study the damage-tolerant design and analysis of fracture mechanics. A double cantilever beam (DCB) with a bi-material crack is considered for analysis. In FEM, specifically a post-processing command virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) is used for evaluation of mixed mode energy release rate of bi-material interface cracks. Validation of obtained results is done with a benchmark problem in the literature. Then parametric studies have been conducted on four different material combinations for a range of crack length and height of the beam. The results generated will be useful for assessing structural integrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shih CF, Moran B, Nakamura T (1986) Energy release rate along a three-dimensional crack front in a thermally stressed body. Int J Fract 30:79–102

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar P (2009) Elements of Fracture Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krueger R (2004) Virtual crack closure technique: History, approach, and applications. Appl Mechan Rev 57(2):109–143

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu PF, Hou SJ, Chu JK, Liu YL, Zhou CL, Zeng JY, Yan L, Zhao A, Hu XY (2011) Finite element analysis of post-buckling and delamination of composite laminates using virtual crack closure technique. Compos Struct 93:1549–1560

    Google Scholar 

  5. Orifici AC, Krueger R (2010) Assessment of static delamination propagation capabilities in commercial finite element codes using benchmark analysis. NIA Report, NASA/CR-2010–216709, June-2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horst G (1985) Delorenzi, energy release rate calculations by the finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):129–143

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fan C, Jar B, Roger Cheng JJ (2007) Prediction of energy release rates for crack growth using FEM-based energy derivative technique. Eng Fract Mechan 74:1243–1254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xie D, Biggers Jr SB (2006) Strain energy release rate calculation for a moving delamination front of arbitrary shape based on the virtual crack closure technique. Eng Fract Mechan 73:771–785

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krueger R, Goetze D (2006) Influence of finite element software on energy release rates computed using the virtual crack closure technique, NIA Report, NASA/CR-2006-214523, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lakshminarayana HV, Bernard M, Bui-Quoc T (1992) A finite element study of interlaminar fracture in composite material. In: Proceedings of international conference on fracture mechanics

    Google Scholar 

  11. ABAQUS analysis, user’s manual, vol 3, Version 6.10, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp USA( 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xie D, Biggers Jr SB (2006) Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique. Finite Elements Anal Des 42: 977–984

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leski A (2007) Implementation of the virtual crack closure technique in engineering FE calculations. Finite Elem Anal Des 43:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh R, Goel S, Verma R, Jayaganthan R, Kumar A (2017) Mechanical behavior of 304 Austenitic stainless steel processed by room temperature rolling, materials science and engineering, vol 330. International conference on recent advances in materials, mechanical and civil engineering 1–2 June 2017, Hyderabad, India

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ambroziak A, Solarczyk M (2018) Application and mechanical properties of aluminium alloys. 10.1201/9781315166605-121

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chan R, Nakamura M (1969) Mechanical properties of plastic foams: the dependence of yield stress and modulus on the structural variables of closed-cell and open-cell foams. J Cell Plast 5(2):112–118

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sudhakar KV, Wood E (2016) Superplastic grade titanium alloy: comparative evaluation of mechanical properties, microstructure, and fracture behavior, vol 2016, Article ID 2309232, p 7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Prajwal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prajwal, M., Yogesha, K.B., Ullegaddi, K., Basava Kumar, K.G. (2020). Energy Release Rate Evaluation of Bi-material Interface Cracks. In: Praveen Kumar, A., Dirgantara, T., Krishna, P.V. (eds) Advances in Lightweight Materials and Structures . Springer Proceedings in Materials, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7827-4_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics