Abstract
Biological explanations of how genes work in our bodies, and how our bodies develop from their embryonic states, have implications for our self-understanding. Are our bodies essentially products of our genes, biomachines produced by a genetic program, or developmental systems which are in relation to others and responsive to the environment we live in? This chapter examines current ideas about the role of genes in development and ageing, especially focusing on epigenetics. It argues that there is a continuity of meanings between ideas of organic responsivity and psychocorporeal responsivity, i.e. between developmental genetics and phenomenology of embodiment. It postulates that philosophy should discuss biology from the perspective of developmental narratives, while being attentive to the life-world meanings they contain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Introduction to her chapter ‘Psychocorporeity, the Autonomous Will, and Living Organ Donation’, published in German as Meyers (2016). I quote from her original manuscript.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
See, for example, the NIH Genetics Home Reference: What is a genome? https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/hgp/genome, accessed 3 July 2019.
- 6.
- 7.
For a comment on this view, see Rehmann-Sutter (2008: 42–45).
References
Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447, 396–398.
Crick, F. H. (1958). On protein synthesis. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 12, 138–163.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gissis, S., & Jablonka, E. (2011). Final discussion. In S. Gissis & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology (pp. 395–409). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Goldberg, A. D., Allis, C. D., & Bernstein, E. (2007). Epigenetics: A landscape takes shape. Cell, 128, 635–638.
Griffiths, P., & Stotz, K. (2013). Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griffiths, P. E., & Hochman, A. (2015). Developmental Systems Theory. eLS. Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003452.pub2.
Gunnarsson Payne, J. (2016). Grammars of kinship: Biological motherhood and assisted reproduction in the age of Epigenetics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41, 483–506.
Haig, D. (2007). Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 415–428.
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2002). The changing concept of epigenetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 981, 82–96.
Jablonka, E. (2013). Epigenetic inheritance and plasticity: The responsive germline. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 111, 99–107.
Johannsen, W. (1909). Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena: G. Fischer.
Le Chapellier, P., & Matta, B. (2011). Cellular perception: When the cell model includes a sense order which ensues from a philosophy of nature, the signaling and epigenetics effects which can result from exposure to magnetic fields are described better. Neuroscience & Medicine, 2, 161–177.
Lucius-Hoene, G., & Deppermann, A. (2004). Narrative Identität und Positionierung. Gesprächsforschung. Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 5, 166–183. ISSN 1617-183. www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de. Accessed 12 August 2019.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (Trans. C. Smith). London: Routledge.
Meyers, D. T. (2016). Psychokorporeität, autonomer Wille und Lebendorganspende. In T. Moos, C. Rehmann-Sutter, & C. Schües (Eds.), Randzonen des Willens. Anthropologische und ethische Probleme von Entscheidungen in Grenzsituationen (pp. 113–131). Frankfurt a. M: Lang
Miska, E. A., & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. (2016). Transgenerational inheritance: Models and mechanisms of non-DNA sequence-based inheritance. Science, 354, 59–63.
Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied action, enacted bodies: The example of hypoglycaemia. Body & Society, 10, 43–62.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.
Nanney, D. L. (1958). Epigenetic control systems. PNAS, 44, 712.
Nelkin, D., & Lindee, S. (1995). The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Freeman: New York.
Nelson, K. (2010). Developmental narratives of the experiencing child. Child Developmental Perspectives, 41, 42–47.
Neumann-Held, E. M., & Rehmann-Sutter, C. (Eds.). (2006). Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Niewöhner, J. (2011). Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularization of biography and milieu. BioSocieties, 6(3), 279–298.
Oyama, S. (1985). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oyama, S. (2000). Causal democracy and causal contributions in developmental systems theory. Philosophy of Science, 67(Proceedings): S332–S347.
Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. (2001). Introduction: What is Developmental Systems Theory? In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution (pp. 1–11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Peirson, B. R. E. (2012). Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype–Phenotype Distinction. Embryo Project Encyclopedia. ISSN: 1940-5030. http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/4206.
Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2002). Genetics, embodiment and identity. In Grunwald et al. (Eds.), On Human Nature: Anthropological, Biological, and Philosophical Foundations (pp. 25–50). Berlin: Springer.
Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2008). Genetics, a practical anthropology. In M. Düwell, C. Rehmann-Sutter, & D. Mieth (Eds.), The Contingent Nature of Life: Bioethics and the Limits of Human Existence (pp. 37–52). Berlin: Springer.
Robinson, M. (2012). The biographical narrative in popular culture, media and communication: An introduction. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 5. https://ojs.meccsa.org.uk/index.php/netknow/article/download/289/123/. Accessed 11 August 2019.
Rothman, B. K. (2001). The Book of Life: A Personal and Ethical Guide to Race, Normality, and the Implications of the Human Genome Project. Boston, MA: Beacon.
Russo, V. E. A., Martienssen, R. A., & Riggs, A. D. (Eds.). (1996). Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation. Woodbury, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Saywitz, K. J., & Camparo, L. B. (2014). Evidence-Based Child Forensic Interviewing: The Developmental Narrative Elaboration Interview. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Practice mind-ed orders. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 50–63). London and New York: Routledge.
Schmidt, K. (2013). Was sind Gene nicht? Über die Grenzen des biologischen Essentialismus. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
Shapiro, J. A. (2009). Revisiting the Central Dogma in the 21st Century. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1178, 6–28.
Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2020). Developmental Narratives: How We Think that Organisms Use Genetic and Epigenetic Information. In: Mahr, D., von Arx, M. (eds) De-Sequencing. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7728-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7728-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7727-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7728-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)