Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Media and Conflict Studies in the Social Media Age

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media and Conflict in the Social Media Era in China

  • 447 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews academic literatures and debates surrounding mediatization of conflict and social media to situate the current research in context. It argues that even though many scholarly researches on media and conflict are existent, mediatized conflicts as a research field still requires theoretical and conceptual development. In addition, in the globalisation and digitalization era, more researches shall be conducted to de-center the Western accounts and to shed light on the social media and conflict relationship. Based on the mediatization of conflict and actor-network theory (ANT), the author proposes and theorizes a new analytical framework to study media-conflict relationship in the social media age. It also illustrates significance of research, research questions and gives a methodological note.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adolf, M. (2011). Clarifying mediatization: Sorting through a current debate Empedocles. European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3, 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W., & Kreis, D. (2013). Black Boxes as Capacities for and Constraints on Action: Electoral Politics, Journalism, and Devices of Representation. Qualitative Sociology, 36, 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W., & Maeyer, J. D. (2015). Objects of journalism and the news. Journalism, 16(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archetti, C. (2014). Journalism and the city. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 586–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brevini, B., & Murdock, G. (2013). Follow the money: Wikileaks and the political economy of disclosure. In B. Brevini, A. Hintz, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications for the future of communications, journalism and society (pp. 35–55). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1980). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not: The socio-logics of translation. In K. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 197–219). Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. (2005). Nationalism, internationalism and Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(42), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2008). Actor network theory and media: Do they connect and on what terms? In A. Hepp et al. (Eds.), Connectivity, networks and flows: Conceptualizing contemporary communications (pp. 93–108). Mahwah, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressman, D. (2009). A brief overview of actor-network theory: Punctualization, heterogeneous engineering & translation. Available at faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Cressman-ABriefOverviewofANT.pdf

  • de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2018). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism, (19(2), 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, D. (2015). Research that empowers responsibility: Reconciling human agency with materiality. Journalism, 16(1), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, D., Masip, P., & Meijer, I. C. (2015). Tracing digital news networks. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falasca, K. (2014). Political news journalism: Mediatization across three news reporting contexts. European Journal of Communication, 29(5), 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. (2017). From computer-assisted to data-driven: Journalism and big data. Journalism, 18(4), 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, F. (2005, August 29). Network Effect. Computerworld. Available at https://www.computerworld.com/article/2556971/network-effect.html

  • Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2015). Technological change in developing countries: Opening the black box of process using actor–network theory. Development Studies Research, 2(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horten, G. (2011). The mediatization of war: A comparison of the American and German media coverage of the Vietnam and Iraq wars. American Journalism, 28(4), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Arrested war: The third phase of mediatization. Information, Communication & Society, 18(11), 1320–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaempf, S. (2013). The mediatisation of war in a transforming global media landscape. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 67(5), 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2007). Actor network theory and material semiotics. Version of 25 April 2007, available at http://www.eterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf

  • Lundby, K. (2014). Mediatization of communication. In K. Lundby & De Gruyter (Eds.), Mediatization of Communication. ProQuest Ebook Central. Retrieved October 2, 2018, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unnc-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1778479

  • Ma, Y. (2018). Online Chinese nationalism: A competing discourse? A discourse analysis of Chinese media texts relating to the Beijing Olympic torch relay in Paris. The Journal of International Communication, 24(2), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, S. (2012). The mediatization of the military. Media, War & Conflict, 5(3), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (2006). On the mediatization of war. The International Communication Gazette, 68(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micó, J. L., Masip, P., & Domingo, D. (2013). To wish impossible things: Convergence as a process of diffusion of innovations in an actor-network. International Communication Gazette, 75, 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, C. J., et al. (2014). Nationalism in local media during international conflict: Text mining domestic news reports of the China–Philippines maritime dispute. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlandstø, L., & Mathisen, B. R. (2017). Participation and control. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, T. (2017). Mediatized war and the moralizing function of news about disruptive events. Journalism, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917693861.

  • Mortensen, M., Eskjær, M. F., & Hjarvard, S. (2015). Conclusion. The mediatization of conflicts: prospects and challenges. In M. F. Eskjær, S. Hjarvard, & M. Mortensen (Eds.), The dynamics of mediatized conflict (pp. 205–211). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plesner, U. (2009). An actor-network perspective on changing work practices. Journalism, 10(5), 604–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poell, T., Kloet, J., & Zeng, G. (2014). Will the real Weibo please stand up? Chinese online contention and actor-network theory. Chinese Journal of Communication, 7(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primo, A., & Zago, G. (2015). Who and what do journalism? Digital Journalism, 3(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D. (2016). The new geography of journalism research. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 816–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2006). The people formerly known as “the audience”. Retrieved December 12, 2018, https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/jay-rosenthe-people-formerly-known-as-the-audience/2006/07/18

  • Siapera, E., Hunt, G., & Lynn, T. (2015). #GazaUnderAttack: Twitter, Palestine and diffused war. Information, Communication & Society, 18(11), 1297–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyridou, L. P., et al. (2013). Journalism in a state of flux: Journalists as agents of technology innovation and emerging news practices. International Communication Gazette, 75, 76–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensen, S., & Ahva, L. (2015). Theories of journalism in a digital age. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2011). Mediatization and perceptions of the media’s political influence. Journalism Studies, 12(4), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z. (2015). Building a security community in Asia-Pacific region: Can China contribute? American Foreign Policy Interests, 37, 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. (2005). Actor-networking the news. Social Epistemology, 19(4), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord, S. (2013). A metatheory of mediatization and globalization? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 8(3), 182–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25(6), 865–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F. (2017). Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(4), 440–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Communications, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China

    Shixin Ivy Zhang

Authors
  1. Shixin Ivy Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shixin Ivy Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, S.I. (2020). Introduction: Media and Conflict Studies in the Social Media Age. In: Media and Conflict in the Social Media Era in China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7635-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation