Skip to main content

Optimizing the Efficiency of Machine Learning Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data and Security (ICBDS 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1210))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The prediction of judicial decisions based on historical datasets in the legal domain is a challenging task. To answer the question about how the court will render a decision in a particular case has remained an important issue. Prior studies conducted on the prediction of judicial case decisions have datasets with limited size by experimenting less efficient set of predictors variables applied to different machine learning classifiers. In this work, we investigate and apply more efficient sets of predictors variables with a machine learning classifier over a large size legal dataset for court judgment prediction. Experimental results are encouraging and depict that incorporation of feature selection technique has significantly improved the performance of predictive classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Singh, A., Thakur, N., Sharma, A.: A review of supervised machine learning algorithms. In: Hoda, M.N. (ed.) 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) 2016, pp. 1310–1315. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kourou, K., Exarchos, T.P., Exarchos, K.P., Karamouzis, M.V., Fotiadis, D.I.: Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 8–17 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asghar, M.Z., Rahman, F., Kundi, F.M., Ahmad, S.: Development of stock market trend prediction system using multiple regression. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 25(3), 271–301 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-019-09292-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, Y.H., Chen, Y.L.: A two-phase sentiment analysis approach for judgement prediction. J. Inf. Sci. 44(5), 504–607 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Habib, A., Akbar, S., Asghar, M.Z., Khattak, A.M., Ali, R., Batool, U.: Rumor detection in business reviews using supervised machine learning. In: 2018 5th International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing (BESC), pp. 233–237. IEEE, Taiwan (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz, D.M., Bommarito, I.I., Michael, J., Blackman, J.: Predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the united states: A general approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.6333 (2014)

  7. Medvedeva, M., Vols, M., Wieling, M.: Judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: looking into the crystal ball. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies. Michigan (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., Lampos, V.: Predicting judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, e93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz, D.M., Bommarito II, M.J., Blackman, J.: A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLoS ONE 12(4), e0174698 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The Supreme Court Database. http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=caseDisposition,last. Accessed 24 Nov 2019

  11. Thaseen, I.S., Kumar, C.A.: Intrusion detection model using fusion of chi-square feature selection and multi class SVM. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 29(4), 462–472 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sivakumar, S.: Predicting US Supreme Court Decision Making (2015). http://srisai85.github.io/courts/courts.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2019

  13. Luo, B., Feng, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, D.: Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with a legal basis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09168 (2017)

  14. Martin, A.D., Quinn, K.M., Ruger, T.W., Kim, P.T.: Competing approaches to predicting supreme court decision making. Perspect. Polit. 2(4), 761–767 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sulea, O.M., Zampieri, M., Vela, M., van Genabith, J.: Predicting the law area and decisions of French supreme court cases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.01681 (2017)

  16. Landthaler, J., Waltl, B., Holl, P., Matthes, F.: Extending full text search for legal document collections using word embeddings. In: JURIX, pp. 73–82 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ye, H., Jiang, X., Luo, Z., Chao, W.: Interpretable charge predictions for criminal cases: Learning to generate court views from fact descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08504 (2018)

  18. Long, S., Tu, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Automatic judgment prediction via legal reading comprehension. In: Sun, M., Huang, X., Ji, H., Liu, Z., Liu, Y. (eds.) CCL 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11856, pp. 558–572. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32381-3_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Das, A.K., Ashrafi, A., Ahmmad, M.: Joint Cognition of Both Human and Machine for Predicting Criminal Punishment in Judicial System, pp. 36–40. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spaeth, H.: The Supreme Court Database (2018). http://scdb.wustl.edu/index.php. Accessed 1 Nov 2019

  21. Spaeth, H.: The Supreme Court Database. http://supremecourtdatabase.org/. Accessed 5 Nov 2019

  22. Li, Y., Yan, C., Liu, W., Li, M.: A principle component analysis-based random forest with the potential nearest neighbor method for automobile insurance fraud identification. Appl. Soft Comput. 70, 1000–1009 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Uğuz, H.: A two-stage feature selection method for text categorization by using information gain, principal component analysis and genetic algorithm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(7), 1024–1032 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brownlee, J.: https://machinelearningmastery.com/feature-selection-machine-learning-python/ (2016). Accessed 15 Sept 2019

  25. Lahoti, S.: Packt. https://hub.packtpub.com/4-ways-implement-feature-selection-python-machine-learning. Accessed 19 Sept 2019

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research work was supported by Zayed University Provost Research Fellowship Award R18114.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asad Masood Khattak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ullah, A., Asghar, M.Z., Habib, A., Aleem, S., Kundi, F.M., Khattak, A.M. (2020). Optimizing the Efficiency of Machine Learning Techniques. In: Tian, Y., Ma, T., Khan, M. (eds) Big Data and Security. ICBDS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1210. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7530-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7530-3_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7529-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7530-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics