Abstract
Ur-narrative can be briefly defined as the earliest narrative about the movement of the sun that also gives birth to sun myth. This chapter will examine the relationship between Ur-narrative and sun myth, analyze the traces of Ur-narrative in sun myth, and explore the initial formations and causes in order to enhance our understanding of the origins and evolution of narrative. Ur-narrative has a far-reaching influence on the cognitive development of humans: the movement of the sun from east to west in the daytime and the imagined movement from west to east at night provided the deep structure and basic conflicts for the early men’s storytelling. From the sun’s cyclical movement arose the circle theory that brought people to presume that “the circle is valuable”, and Yi Jing (or, The Book of Change), a book also based upon the circle theory, and all of these played a significant role in the development of narrative in later ages. By criticizing Northrop Frye’s otherwise impressive work on sun myth, we can pin down the functions of Ur-narrative in the history of narrative development. The reasons why ancient people kept telling sun stories is that these stories could increase their sense of mastery of the world by consolidating their faith in the order and rules of the universe. In a world where the sun rises every day and light triumphs over darkness, man is not supposed to lose his faith in his own destiny. In constructing a Chinese Narratology with its own features and system, Ur-narrative should have a very important role to play, because Chinese people think of themselves as being the descendants of Yandi and Huangdi who are actually gods of light.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Zang (1995), pp. 184–185.
- 2.
Hu et al. (2001), p. 234.
- 3.
Tylor (1871), p. 260.
- 4.
Chen (2005), pp. 8–9.
- 5.
Ye (1992), p. 205.
- 6.
Wang (2008a), p. 130.
- 7.
Ye (1992), pp. 219–226.
- 8.
Fu (2004), p. 85.
- 9.
Lin (1996), p. 356.
- 10.
Tylor (1871), p. 382.
- 11.
Tylor (1896), p. 360.
- 12.
Eco (2004), p. 102.
- 13.
Jung (1959), p. 6.
- 14.
Tylor (1896), p. 388.
- 15.
Tylor (1896), p. 391.
- 16.
Vico (1948), pp. 104–105.
- 17.
Vico (1948), p. 105.
- 18.
Vico (1948), p. 105.
- 19.
Fraser (1990), pp. 78–80.
- 20.
Müller (1901), pp. 280–281.
- 21.
Müller (1901), p. 216.
- 22.
Müller (1901), pp. 199–200.
- 23.
Max Müller, Comparative Mythology: An Essay, Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, p. 82.
- 24.
Ovid (2008), pp. 14–18.
- 25.
Ernst Cassirer, Language and Myth, trans. Susanne K. Langer, New York: Dover Publications Inc., p. 4.
- 26.
Ye (2005), p. 199.
- 27.
Tylor (1896), p. 397.
- 28.
Müller (1901), pp. 296–297.
- 29.
Müller (1901), p. 214.
- 30.
Tylor (1871), pp. 262–263.
- 31.
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p. 159.
- 32.
E. M. Forster, Aspects of the Novel, San Diego: A Harvest Book, p. 26.
- 33.
Tylor (1871), p. 44.
- 34.
Vico (1948), p. 105.
- 35.
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p.159.
- 36.
Tylor (1871), p. 303.
- 37.
Tylor (1871), p. 62.
- 38.
Max Müller, Comparative Mythology: An Essay, Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, p. 104.
- 39.
Max Müller, Comparative Mythology: An Essay, Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, pp. 104–105.
- 40.
Max Müller, Comparative Mythology: An Essay, Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, p. 105.
- 41.
Max Müller, Comparative Mythology: An Essay, Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, p. 106.
- 42.
Wang (2008b), pp. 561–562.
- 43.
Xiao (1987), p. 21.
- 44.
Ye (2005), pp. 194–195.
- 45.
Tylor (2016), pp. 264–265.
- 46.
Tylor (1896), p. 394.
- 47.
Panati (1987), p. 172.
- 48.
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p. 190.
- 49.
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 190–191.
- 50.
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p. 190.
- 51.
Frye (1982), p. 35.
- 52.
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p. 190.
- 53.
Ye (1992), pp. 119–120.
- 54.
Qian (1984), pp. 111–114.
- 55.
Qian (1979), p. 230.
- 56.
Yang (1995), p. 688.
- 57.
Yang (1995), p. 688.
- 58.
Qian (2002a), p. 88.
- 59.
Chen (1988), pp 58-65.
- 60.
Russell (2004), p. 665.
- 61.
Qian (2002b), p. 84.
- 62.
Qian (2002a), p. 87.
- 63.
Max Müller, Comparative Mythology: An Essay, Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, p. 123.
- 64.
Müller (1901), pp. 258–259.
- 65.
Plato (1983), p. 95.
References
Chen, Liangyun. 1988. On the Semiotic Symbols of Zhouyi. Philosophical Research 3.
Chen, Wenhua. 2005. A History of Chinese Ancient Agriculture. Nanchang: Jiangxi Science and Technology Press.
Eco, Umberto (ed.). 2004. On Beauty: A History of a Western Idea, Trans. Secker and Warburg: Alastair McEwen, London.
Fraser, J. G. 1990. The Golden Bough. Palgrave.
Frye, Northrop. 1982. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Fu, Xiuyan. 2004. Textology. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Hu, Zhaoliang, et al. 2001. An Overview of Chinese Cultural Geography. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Jung, C. G. 1959. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Part I: Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, vol. 9, 2nd ed., ed. and translated by Gerhard Adler and R. F. C. Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lin, Huixiang. 1996. Cultural Anthropology. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Müller, Max. 1901. Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Ovid. 2008. Metamorphoses. Translated by A.D. Melville. New York: Oxford University Press.
Panati, Charles. 1987. Extraordinary Originals of Everyday Things. New York: Harper & Row.
Plato. 1983. Dialogue of Literature and Art. Translated by Guangqian Zhu. Beijing: People’s Literature Press.
Qian, Zhongshu. 1979. Guan Zhui Bian, vol. I. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Qian, Zhongshu. 1984. Pondering about Arts. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Qian, Mu. 2002a. Speeches on Chinese Popular Thoughts. Beijing: San Lian Press.
Russell, Bertrand. 2004. History of Western Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
Ye, Shuxian. 2005. The Hero and the Sun. Xi’an: Shaanxi People’s Press.
Tylor, Edward B. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, vol. II. London: British Library.
Tylor, Edward B. 1896. Anthropology: an Introduction to the Study of Man and Civilization. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Tylor, Edward B. 2016(1871). Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, vol. I. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
Vico, G. 1948. The New Science. Translated by Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. New York: Cornell University Press.
Wang, Xiaodun. 2008a. A Study of Early Chinese Thoughts and Symbols: On the Origin and System Formation of the Four Gods. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.
Wang, Xiaodun. 2008b. A Study of Early Chinese Thoughts and Symbols: On the Origin and System Formation of the Four Gods (II). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.
Xiao, Bing. 1987. Chu Ci and Myth. Nanjing: Jiangsu Ancient Books Press.
Yang, Yi. 1995. A History of Chinese Classical Fiction. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Ye, Shuxian. 1992. Chinese Mythology and Philosophy. Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press.
Zang, Kehe. 1995. Cultural Interpretation of Shuo Wen Jie Zi. Wuhan: Hubei People’s Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Peking University Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fu, X. (2021). Ur-Narrative and the Sun Myth. In: Chinese Narratologies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7507-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7507-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7506-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7507-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)