Advertisement

Public Intellectuals on New Platforms: Constructing Critical Authority in a Digital Media Culture

  • Mikkel Bækby JohansenEmail author
Chapter
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter introduces a multidimensional theoretical framework for studying public intellectuals in the digital media culture. The purpose of the framework is to retheorize the notion of public intellectual authority and autonomy in light of new media platforms and the transformed position of audiences. Constructing public intellectual authority is a complex process involving six interrelated dimensions: (1) qualification, (2) institutions, (3) media, (4) discourse, (5) personality, and (6) users. Although the chapter is mainly theoretical, the framework is illustrated by empirical examples taken from the online intellectual community, “The Intellectual Dark Web” (IDW). As a case of contemporary public intellectualism, the IDW is characterized by the use of social media, YouTube and crowdfunding sites to circumvent legacy institutions. However, this circumvention does not represent a realization of the ideal of intellectual autonomy. On the contrary, public intellectuals have become platform dependent. Changing media logics, platform infrastructures and new forms of user engagement play significant roles in shaping the public intellectual conversation. The framework presented in this chapter aims to provide future empirical studies with the analytical tools to explain the complex process of constructing public intellectual authority in a digital media culture.

Keywords

Authority Intellectual Intellectual Dark Web Platformization Public intellectual Social media 

References

  1. Baert, P. (2015). The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baert, P., & Morgan, M. (2018). A Performative Framework for the Study of Intellectuals. European Journal of Social Theory, 21(3), 322–339.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017690737.
  3. Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity, and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bowles, N. (2018, December 24). Patreon Bars Anti-Feminist for Racist Speech, Inciting Revolt. The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/technology/patreon-hate-speech-bans.html.
  6. Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube, Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (2017). The Responsibility of Intellectuals. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collini, S. (2006). Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlgren, P. (2013). From Public Intellectuals to Civic Intellectuals: Political Agency and Emerging Media Landscapes. In P. Thijssen, W. Weyns, C. Timmerman, & S. Mels (Eds.), New Public Spheres: Recontextualizing the Intellectual (pp. 51–67). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Google Scholar
  10. Desch, M. C. (2016). Public Intellectuals in the Global Arena: Professors or Pundits? Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Di Leo, J. R., & Hitchcock, P. (2016). Introduction: Before the Beginning, After the End: Toward a New Public Intellectual. In J. R. Di Leo & P. Hitchcock (Eds.), The New Public Intellectual: Politics, Theory, and the Public Sphere (pp. ix–xxix). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  12. Drezner, D. W. (2017). The Ideas Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Drezner, D. W. (2018, May 18). The Ideas Industry Meets the Intellectual Dark Web. The Washington Post. Retrieved February 19, 2020, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/05/11/the-ideas-industry-meets-the-intellectual-dark-web/?arc404=true.
  14. Duller, M., Korom, P., Schögler, R. Y., & Fleck, C. (2017). Scholars as European Public Intellectuals? Media Interventions in the 2014 European Parliament Election Campaign. European Societies, 20(2), 322–353.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2017.1402119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fornäs, J. (2017). Defending Culture: Conceptual Foundations and Contemporary Debate. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Furedi, F. (2004). Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Including a Reply to Furedi’s Critics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Furedi, F. (2013). Authority: A Sociological History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gramsci, A. (1986). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, J. (2009). Europe: The Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hayek, F. A. (1949). The Intellectuals and Socialism. The University of Chicago Law Review, 16(3), 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heynders, O. (2016). Writers as Public Intellectuals: Literature, Celebrity, Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Jack, C. (2018). Producing Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose: How Libertarian Ideology Became Broadcasting Balance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 514–530.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1484291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobs, R. N., & Townsley, E. (2011). The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jacobs, R. N., & Townsley, E. (2018). Media Meta-Commentary and the Performance of Expertise. European Journal of Social Theory, 21(3), 340–356.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017740720.
  25. Joffe, J. (2003). The Decline of the Public Intellectual and the Rise of the Pundit. In R. M. Zinman, J. Weinberger, & A. M. Melzer (Eds.), The Public Intellectual: Between Philosophy and Politics (pp. 118–130). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar
  26. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2015). From Ivory Tower to Cross-Media Personas: The Heterogeneous Cultural Critic in the Media. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 853–871.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1051370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lykkeberg, R. (2018). En tænketank, et politisk projekt, et stykke åndshistorie og et kammeratskab. In H. S. Kjær (Ed.), Hele verden forfra: Dagbladet Information 19932018 (pp. 11–23). Informations Forlag.Google Scholar
  28. Mah, H. (2013). The Intellectual in the Public Sphere: Projections, Contradictions and Dilemmas Since the Enlightenment. In P. Thijssen, W. Weyns, C. Timmerman, & S. Mels (Eds.), New Public Spheres: Recontextualizing the Intellectual (pp. 13–26). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Google Scholar
  29. Mannheim, K. (1936) [1929]. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  30. Mapua, J. (2018). Understanding Memes and Internet Satire. Enslow Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  31. McLaughlin, N., & Townsley, E. (2011). Contexts of Cultural Diffusion: A Case Study of “Public Intellectual” Debates in English Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 48(4), 341–368.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2011.01268.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Misztal, B. A. (2012). Public Intellectuals and Think Tanks: A Free Market of Ideas? International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 25(4), 127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity. New Media and Society, 20(11), 4275–4295.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694.
  34. Posner, R. A. (2001). Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Saïd, E. (1996). Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  36. Svendsen, E. (2018). Danske intellektuelle på Facebook: Eksemplificeret ved Svend Brinkmann og Carsten Jensen. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 34(65), 54–75.  https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104886.
  37. Thijssen, P., Weyns, W, Timmerman, C., & Mels, S. (2013). New Public Spheres: Recontextualizing the Intellectual. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Google Scholar
  38. Townsley, E. (2015). Public Intellectuals, Media Intellectuals and Academic Intellectuals: Comparing the Space of Opinion in Canada and the United States. In M. Keren & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Speaking Power to Truth: Digital Discourse and the Public Intellectual (pp. 41–67). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Turner, J. H. (1997). The Institutional Order: Economy, Kinship, Religion, Polity, Law, and Education in Evolutionary and Comparative Perspective. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  40. Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding Social Media Logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.  https://doi.org/10.12924/mac2013.01010002.
  41. Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Weaver, M. (2019, June 13). Jordan Peterson Launches Anti-Censorship Site Thinkspot. The Guardian. Retrieved August 26, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jun/13/jordan-peterson-launches-anti-censorship-site-thinkspot.
  43. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Weiss, B. (2018, May 8). Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web. The New York Times. Retrieved on August 28, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/intellectual-dark-web.html.
  45. Young, A. M. (2014). Prophets, Gurus, and Pundits: Rhetorical Styles and Public Engagement. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations