Advertisement

Where to Look Next for a Shot of Culture? Repertoires of Cultural Information Production and Consumption on the Internet

  • Marc VerboordEmail author
  • Rian Koreman
  • Susanne Janssen
Chapter
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Cultural journalism contributes to the symbolic production culture, but an understudied element is how audiences partake in using and valuing cultural information in the media. This chapter examines how audiences use the internet to find information on new cultural products as well as contribute to the production of information. Our study is relatively explorative: We set out to find the underlying dimensions in producing and consuming online cultural information, in other words: the repertoires of user-generated content (UGC). At the same time, we also aim to contribute to the explanation of creating and consuming cultural UGC. We use data of an online survey in the Netherlands to answer our questions. We find five distinguished clusters, ranging in size from 46 pct. to 4 pct. of the population: occasional review readers, basic information users, moderate omnivores, ardent producers, and heavy omnivores. Differences between these groups can partly be explained via demographics background: age and educational level, but not sex. Cultural capital is also a strong predictor for cluster membership. Finally, we find an influence of internet affordances: repertoires are shaped by the perceived convenience of the internet as well as the importance of diversity of opinions.

Keywords

Cultural journalism Cultural information Latent class analysis Media audiences Media repertoires User-generated content 

References

  1. Baumann, S. (2007). Hollywood Highbrow. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., Andrews, K. R., & Serota, K. (2011). Identifying Influence: Development and Validation of the Connectivity, Persuasiveness, and Maven Scales. Journal of Communication, 61, 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods. Media, Culture and Society, 2(3), 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge & Kegan and Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y., & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics’ Reviews on Pre-Release Movie Evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, T. W. (Ed.). (2010). Social Status and Cultural Consumption. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, W., & Lee, Y. (2019). Effects of Fashion Vlogger Attributes on Product Attitude and Content Sharing. Fashion and Textiles: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 6(1, 12), 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in Art. American Sociological Review, 52, 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eide, M., & Knight, G. (1999). Public/Private: Service Journalism and the Problems of Everyday Life. European Journal of Communication, 14(4), 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2013). Cultural Access and Participation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion.
  12. European Commission. (2016). Media Use in the European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion.
  13. Forde, E. (2003). Journalists with a Difference: Producing Music Journalism. In S. Cottle (Ed.), Media Organisations and Production (pp. 113–130). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2013). Digital Inequality. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0007.
  15. Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2018). From Internet Access to Internet Skills: Digital Inequality Among Older Adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239–256.Google Scholar
  17. Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media Repertoires as a Result of Selective Media Use: A Conceptual Approach to the Analysis of Patterns of Exposure. Communications, 31, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heilbrun, J. (1997). The Competition Between High Culture and Popular Culture as Seen in the New York Times. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21, 29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007304802683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2004). Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Motives for and Consequences of Reading Customer Articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hovden, J. F., & Kristensen, N. N. (2018). The Cultural Journalist Around the Globe: A Comparative Study of Characteristics, Role Perceptions, and Perceived Influences. Journalism. First Published August 16, 2018 (online first).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918791224.
  21. Jaakkola, M. (2015). Outsourcing Views, Developing News: Changes in Art Criticism in Finnish Dailies, 1978–2008. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaakkola, M. (2018). Vernacular Reviews as a Form of Co-Consumption: The User-Generated Review Videos on YouTube. MedieKultur—Journal of Media and Communication Research. Special Issue “Cultural Critique: Re-Negotiating Cultural Authority in Contemporary Media Culture”, 34(65), 10–30.Google Scholar
  23. Janssen, S. (1999). Art Journalism and Cultural Change: The Coverage of the Arts in Dutch Newspapers 1965–1990. Poetics, 26(5), 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janssen, S., & Verboord, M. (2015). Cultural Mediators and Gatekeepers. In J. D. Wright (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 440–446). Oxford: Elsevier. ISBN: 9780080970868.Google Scholar
  25. Janssen, S., Verboord, M., & Kuipers, G. (2011). Comparing Cultural Classification. Special issue 51 of Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS), 63, 139–168.Google Scholar
  26. Kammer, A. (2015). Post-Industrial Cultural Criticism: The Everyday Amateur Expert and the Online Cultural Public Sphere. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 872–889.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, S. H., Park, N., & Park, S. H. (2013). Exploring the Effects of Online Word of Mouth and Expert Reviews on Theatrical Movies’ Box Office Success. Journal of Media Economics, 26(2), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraaykamp, G., & Eijck, Van. (2010). The Intergenerational Reproduction of Cultural Capital: A Threefold Perspective. Social Forces, 89(1), 209–231.Google Scholar
  29. Kristensen, N. N. (2010). The Historical Transformation of Cultural Journalism. Northern Lights, 8, 69–92.  https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.8.69_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kristensen, N. N. (2019). Cultural Journalism—Journalism About Culture. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12701.
  31. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2012). Lifestyle Journalism: Blurring Boundaries. Journalism Practice, 6(1), 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2015). From Ivory Tower to Cross-Media Personas: The Heterogeneous Cultural Critics in the Media. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 853–871.Google Scholar
  33. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2018). Cultural Journalists on Social Media. MedieKultur, 65, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kristensen, N. N., & Riegert, K. (Eds.). (2017). Cultural Journalism in the Nordic Countries. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  35. McDonald, R. (2007). The Death of the Critic. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. McKenzie, P. J., Burkell, J., Wong, L., Whippey, C., Trosow, S. E., & McNally, M. (2012). User-Generated Online Content 1: Overview, Current State and Context. First Monday, 17(6).Google Scholar
  37. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, H.-D. (2000). Taste Formation in Pluralistic Societies: The Role of Rhetorics and Institutions. International Sociology, 15(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
  39. Morse, B. J., Gullekson, N. L., Morris, S. A., & Popovich, P. M. (2011). The Development of a General Internet Attitudes Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 480–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). First Published September 30, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Parikh, A., Behnke, C., Vorvoreanu, M., Almanza, B., & Nelson, D. (2014). Motives for Reading and Articulating User-Generated Restaurant Reviews on Yelp.com. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 5, 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Picone, I., Kleut, J., Pavličková, T., Romic, B., Møller Hartley, J., & De Rider, S. (2019). Small Acts of Engagement: Reconnecting Productive Audience Practices with Everyday Agency. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2010–2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porcu, M., & Giambona, F. (2017). Introduction to Latent Class Analysis with Applications. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(1), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Purhonen, S., Heikkilä, R., Hazir, I. K., Lauronen, T., Rodríguez, C. J. F., & Gronow, J. (2019). Enter Culture, Exit Arts? The Transformation of Cultural Hierarchies in European Newspaper Culture Sections, 1960–2010. Abingdon, UK and New York, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Rettberg, J. W. (2013). Blogging: Digital Media and Society Series (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10, 13–36.Google Scholar
  47. Ruvio, A., & Shoham, A. (2007). Innovativeness, Exploratory Behavior, Market Mavenship, and Opinion Leadership: An Empirical Examination in the Asian Context. Psychology & Marketing, 24, 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schaper, J., de Haan, J., & Wennekers, A. (2019). Trends in Media: Tijd. The Hague: SCP—The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2019/12/19/trends-in-media-tijd.
  49. Swart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Navigating Cross-Media News Use. Journalism Studies, 18(11), 1343–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content. Media, Culture and Society, 31(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verboord, M. (2010). The Legitimacy of Book Critics in the Age of the Internet and Omnivorousness. European Sociological Review, 26(6), 623–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verboord, M. (2014). The Impact of Peer-Produced Criticism on Cultural Evaluation: A Multilevel Analysis of Discourse Employment in Online and Offline Film Reviews. New Media & Society, 16(6), 921–940.Google Scholar
  53. Verboord, M. (2019). Music Mavens Revisited: Comparing the Impact of Connectivity and Dispositions in the Digital Age. Journal of Consumer Culture. First Published April 26, 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540519846203.
  54. Verboord, M., & Janssen, S. (2015). Arts Journalism and Its Packaging in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States 1955–2005. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 829–852.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1051369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vermunt, J., & Magidson, J. (2016). Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 5.1: Basic, Advanced, and Syntax. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.Google Scholar
  56. Vos, T. P., Eichholz, M., & Karaliova, T. (2019). Audiences and Journalistic Capital: Roles of Journalism. Journalism Studies, 20(7), 1009–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Webster, J. (2014). The Marketplace of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wellman, B., Quan-Hasse, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Diaz, I., & Miyato, K. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), JCMC834.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations