Advertisement

The Survival of the Critic: Audiences’ Use of Cultural Information and Cultural Reviews in Legacy Media

  • Nete Nørgaard KristensenEmail author
  • Unni From
Chapter
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter examines how people engage across media with a combination of what is often referred to as cultural journalism, cultural criticism and information about culture beyond the domain of journalism and criticism. We focus on the Danish context as an interesting case in point considering the subsidy measures implemented to support the production and circulation of art, culture and cultural information in society. Based on a national survey of a representative sample of the Danish population, the study shows that people are quite interested in information about culture and use a variety of media platforms and sources to access such information, including their own personal network. The study also shows that people still find legacy media and their critics highly trustworthy and consider the review an important cultural genre, despite the many new types of critical arts- and culture-related discourses circulating across platforms. These findings contribute to especially cultural journalism studies, which have taken very little interest in the audience perspective but also to audience studies, which have shown no particular interest in people’s use of cultural information.

Keywords

Audience research Cultural criticism Cultural journalism Media use Media trust 

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by Dagpressens Fond (data collection) and Independent Research Fund Denmark, DFF-grant 4180-00082.

References

  1. Agency for Culture and Palaces. (2017). Den nationale brugerundersøgelse Årsrapport 2017 [The National User Survey Yearly Report 2017]. https://slks.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/0_SLKS/Dokumenter/Publikationer/2018/Den_nationale_brugerundersoegelse_2017._Rapport.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019.
  2. Ahva, L., van Dalen, A., Hovden, J. F., Kolbeins, G. H., Nilsson, M. L., Skovsgaard, M., et al. (2016). A Welfare State of Mind. Journalism Studies, 18, 595–613.Google Scholar
  3. Beaudouin, V., & Pasquier, D. (2016). Forms of Contribution and Contributors’ Profiles: An Automated Textual Analysis of Amateur on Line Film Critics. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1810–1828.Google Scholar
  4. Beuscart, J.-S., & Mellet, K. (2016). Shaping Consumers’ Online Voices: Algorithmic Apparatus or Evaluation Culture? In R. Seyfert & J. Roberge (Eds.), Algorithmic Cultures: Essays on Meaning, Performance and New Technologies (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bucher, T. (2017). The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms, Information. Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44.Google Scholar
  7. Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Journalism, Audiences, and News Experience. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (2nd ed., pp. 389–405). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Costera Meijer, I., & Kormelink, T. G. (2017). Revisiting the Audience Turn in Journalism. In B. Franklin & S. Eldrigde II (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies (pp. 345–353). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2010). Media Consumption and Public Engagement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Duelund, P., & Valtysson, B. (2012). Compendium in Cultural Policies and Trends in Europe: Denmark. http://www.culturalpolicies.net/down/denmark_032012.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2019.
  11. Fletcher, R., & Park, S. (2017). The Impact of Trust in the News Media on Online News Consumption and Participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. From, U. (2018). Lifestyle Journalism. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. From, U. (2019). Criticism and Reviews. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Hellman, H., & Jaakkola, M. (2012). From Aesthetes to Reporters: The Paradigm Shift in Arts Journalism in Finland. Journalism, 13(6), 783–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hjarvard, S. (2016). Danskernes smag for litteratur [Danes’ Taste for Literature]. Passage, 76, 145–167.Google Scholar
  16. Hovden, J. F., & Kristensen, N. N. (2018). The Cultural Journalist Around the Globe. Journalism. Online first: August 16, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918791224.
  17. Jaakkola, M. (2015). The Contested Autonomy of Arts and Journalism: Change and Continuity of the Dual Professionalism of Cultural Journalism. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jaakkola, M. (2018). Vernacular Reviews as a Form of Co-Consumption: The User-Generated Review Videos on YouTube. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 34(65), 10–30.Google Scholar
  19. Janssen, S., Kuipers, G., & Verboord, M. (2008). Cultural Globalization and Arts Journalism: The International Orientation of Arts and Culture Coverage in Dutch, French, German, and U.S. Newspapers, 1955 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssen, S., & Verboord, M. (2015). Cultural Mediators and Gatekeepers. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 440–446). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, J. L., Buch, R., Johansen, J. D., Madsen, P. T., & Svith, F. (2019). Aktiv, overvældet, adspredt eller afhængig? [Active, Overwhelmed, Diverted or Dependent?]. Copenhagen: Kulturstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  22. Katz-Gerro, T., & Jæger, M. M. (2013). Top of the Pops, Ascend of the Omnivores, Defeat of the Couch Potatoes: Cultural Consumption Profiles in Denmark 1975–2004. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristensen, N. N. (2018). Churnalism, Cultural (Inter)mediation and Sourcing in Cultural Journalism. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2168–2186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2011). Kulturjournalistik – Journalistik om Kultur [Cultural Journalism—Journalism About Culture]. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  25. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2015). From Ivory Tower to Cross-Media Personas: The Heterogeneous Cultural Critics in the Media. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 853–871.Google Scholar
  26. Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2018). Cultural Journalists on Social Media. MedieKultur, 65, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Livingstone, S. (2013). The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research. Communication Review, 16(1–2), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald, R. (2007). The Death of the Critic. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Ministry of Culture. (2012). Danskernes kulturvaner [The Danes’ Cultural Habits]. https://kum.dk/uploads/tx_templavoila/Bogen%20danskernes_kulturvaner_pdfa.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019.
  30. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2019.
  31. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Digital News Report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/DNR_2019_FINAL_27_08_2019.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019.
  32. Purhonen, S., Heikkilä, R., Hazir, I. K., Lauronen, T., Rodríguez, C. J. F., & Gronow, J. (2019). Enter Culture, Exit Arts? The Transformation of Cultural Hierarchies in European Newspaper Culture Section, 1960–2010. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Riegert, K., & Widholm, A. (2019). The Difference Culture Makes: Comparing Swedish News and Cultural Journalism on the 2015 Terrorist Attacks in Paris. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schrøder, K. C. (2019). What Do News Readers Really Want to Read About? How Relevance Works for News Audiences. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-03/Schroder_How_relevance_works_for_news_audiences_FINAL.pdf.%20Accessed%2010%20September%202019. Accessed 10 Sept 2019.
  35. Schrøder, K. C., Blach-Ørsten, M., and Eberholst, M. (2019). Danskernes brug af nyhedsmedier 2019 [Danes’ Use of News Media 2019]. RUC: Center for Nyhedsforskning.Google Scholar
  36. Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic Culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Area. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Szántó, A., Levy, D. S., & Tyndall, A. (2004). Reporting the Arts II. Columbia University: National Arts Journalism Program.Google Scholar
  39. Verboord, M. (2010). The Legitimacy of Book Critics in the Age of the Internet and Omnivorousness: Expert Critics, Internet Critics and Peer Critics in Flanders and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 26(6), 623–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Widholm, A., Riegert, K., & Roosvall, A. (2019). Abundance or Crisis? Transformations in the Media Ecology of Swedish Cultural Journalism Over Four Decades. Journalism. Published online August 6, 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919866077.
  41. Ytre-Arne, B., & Das, R. (2018). In the Interest of Audiences: An Agenda. In R. Das & B. Ytre-Arne (Eds.), Future of Audiences (pp. 275–292). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations