Skip to main content

Management of EFM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

Uterine contraction (UC) (Fig. 2.1) is the main force of labor and occurs throughout labor. Post-parturient UC shortens the cervical canal until it disappears, dilates the uterine orifice, makes fetal presentation descend, and promotes the delivery of the fetus and placenta. Post-parturient UC is manifested as labor pains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  1. Xie X, Kong B, Tao D. Gynemetrics. 9th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shuliang S, Guo X. Practical fetal electronic monitoring. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boya L, Huixia Y. Fetal monitoring methods and evaluation. Chin J Perinatal Med. 2016;6:442–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on the application of electronic fetal monitoring. Chin J Perinatal Med. 2015;7:486–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yuhang L, Zilian W. Clinical application progress of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring. Chin J Obstetric Emergency. 2015;4:243–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manqi C, Jianping Z. Diagnosis and treatment of lupus crisis in pregnancy. Chin J Obstetric Emergency. 2016;5(2):80–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu Y. Common problems of fetal monitoring and countermeasures. Maternal Child Health Care China. 2014;29(2):322–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Omo-Aghoja L. Maternal and fetal acid-base chemistry: a major determinant of perinatal outcome. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(1):8–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin No. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):182–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Delaram M, Jafarzadeh L. The effects of FM counting on pregnancy outcomes. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2):22–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bockenstedt P. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25(2):293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hod M, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: a pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 People's Medical Publishing House, PR of China

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, Z., Guo, X. (2021). Management of EFM. In: Guo, X. (eds) Electronic Fetal Monitoring. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7364-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7364-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7363-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7364-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics