Skip to main content

Creativity and Education: Facilitating Transfer of Learning Through Digital Creativity Multimodal Analysis (DCMA) of Social Media Posts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Media Spectacles and Multimodal Creativity in a Globalised Asia

Part of the book series: Digital Culture and Humanities ((DICUHU,volume 3))

  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the limited research in multimodal creativity, which subsequently hinders the effectiveness of existing pedagogies in digital literacy, multimodal literacy, and creativity literacy, particularly in the aspect of transfer. Using the Analytical Framework for Creativity in Multimodal Texts (AFCMT), this study demonstrates how the transfer of learning can be facilitated through a digital creativity multimodal analysis (DCMA) of several viral social media posts from Hong Kong, placing emphasis on instructional design, content relevance and transfer specificity. Key components of AFCMT, namely the IEEE matrix and the Cline of Creativity Complexity (CCC), are discussed in terms of their flexibility and potential incorporative power with theories, hypotheses, or frameworks of other research approaches from various disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 100億負能量戰士. (2018, January 4). 「生意好的時候必然預計下年環球經濟會轉 [Status update; Image attached]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/negativepowerfighter/photos/a.1518278508246493/1751530668254608/

  • Anderson, H. H. (1959). Creativity and its cultivation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple Daily. (2016a, 12 13). 葡萄X淑儀寸財:爺辭職唔係咁簡單要有諮詢. Retrieved from 特首選戰 2017—【特首選戰】: https://ce2017.appledaily.com.hk/articles/1_56042609

  • Apple Daily. (2016b, October 30). 葡萄X淑儀 德國佬都抽水添. Retrieved from 蘋果日報: https://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20161030/19817115

  • Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2008). Applications of multimodal concordances. Hermes—Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 11–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A. (2007). Towards a grande paradigmatique of film: Christian Metz reloaded. Semiotica, 167(1–4), 13–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A. (2013). Hallidayan systemic-functional semiotics and the analysis of the moving audiovisual image. Text & Talk, 33(4–5), 641–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. London & New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, G. M. (1949). The content of educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40(5), 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Z. (2016). Multimodality, creativity and children’s meaning-making: Drawings, writings, imaginings. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 49, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5842/49-0-669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (1994). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103, 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2009). Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine, 30(3), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caple, H. (2013). Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census and Statistics Department. (2017, February 27). Proportion of population aged 5 and over able to speak selected languages/dialects by year. Retrieved March 15, 2017, from 2016 Population By-census: https://www.bycensus2016.gov.hk/en/bc-mt.html

  • cheksiuting. (2016, October 27). [原創][改詞] 葡萄*淑儀. Retrieved from 香港膠登 HKGalden: https://hkgalden.com/view/384946

  • Cheng, K. (2018a, September 17). Community groups urge Chief Exec. Carrie Lam to order day off for Super Typhoon Mangkhut clean-up. Retrieved from Hong Kong Free Press HKFP: https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/09/17/community-groups-urge-chief-exec-carrie-lam-order-day-off-super-typhoon-mangkhut-clean/

  • Cheng, K. (2018b, September 17). Chief Executive urges employers to be considerate as damage from Typhoon Mangkhut causes delays. Retrieved from Hong Kong Free Press HKFP: https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/09/17/chief-executive-urges-employers-considerate-damage-typhoon-mangkhut-causes-delays/

  • Cheng, K. (2018c, September 18). In pictures: Hongkongers’ post-typhoon commutes spawn memes and Photoshop wizardry. Retrieved from Hong Kong Free Press HKFP: https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/09/18/pictures-hongkongers-post-typhoon-commutes-spawn-memes-photoshop-wizardry/

  • Chow, V., & Cheung, A. (2016). [膠登音樂台] 《葡萄乘淑儀》(原曲:《葡萄成熟時》, 陳奕迅) [Recorded by 小. 妁]. Hong Kong, Hong Kong: T. Shek. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5GCpHBljCI

  • Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary years. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2007). Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E., & Voogel, A. (1985). Transfer of training principles for instructional design. Education Communication and Technology Journal, 33, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coconuts Hong Kong. (2016, December 15). R.IP: Netizens Photoshop Regina Ip’s Chief Executive campaign poster to spell out ‘death’ for Hong Kong. Retrieved from Coconuts Hong Kong: https://coconuts.co/hongkong/news/rip-chief-executive-hopeful-regina-ip-mocked-online-campaign-poster-gaffe/

  • Coffin, C. (2013, August). Using systemic functional linguistics to explore digital technologies in educational contexts. In: S. Sarangi (Ed.), Text & Talk, 33(4–5), 497–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djonov, E., & Zhao, S. (Eds.). (2014). Critical multimodal studies of popular culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drevdahl, J. E. (1956). Factors of importance for creativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drevdahl, J. E., & Cattell, R. B. (1958). Journal of Clinical Psychology. Personality and creativity in artists and writers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ET Net. (2017, February 17). 《立會透視鏡–馬天娜》西環為林鄭組織「突擊隊」. Retrieved from 經濟通 ET Net: https://www.etnet.com.hk/www/tc/news/categorized_news_detail.php?category=latest&newsid=ETN270217903

  • German Consulate General Hong Kong. (2016, October 29). Word of the week: Saucer. Retrieved from German Consulate General Hong Kong Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GermanConsulateGeneralHongKong/photos/a.527198957480227.1073741830.500121550187968/583340511866071/?type=3&theater

  • Goldstein, I. L. (1986). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • GovHK. (2008, March 17). Chapter I : General principles. Retrieved March 15, 2017, from Basic Law Full Text: https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_1.html

  • GovHK. (2017, March 15). Homepage (Residents). Retrieved March 15, 2017, from GovHK 香港政府一站通: https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/tc/basiclawtext/

  • Guo, S. N., & Feng, D. Z. (2015). Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 31, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014 [1985]). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th edn.) London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, R. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning (Educational psychology). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberle, V. M., & Abreu, B. B. (2012). Investigating multimodality: An analysis of students’ diary journals. Linguagem Em Foco, 1, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Observatory. (2018). Super Typhoon Mangkhut (1822): 7 to 17 September 2018. Retrieved from Hong Kong Observatory: https://www.weather.gov.hk/informtc/mangkhut18/report.htm

  • Hyland, K., & Paltridge, B. (Eds.). (2011). Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. A. (2014). Learning transfer in English-for-academic-purposes contexts: A systematic review of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. [chasejarvis]. (2018, September 17). Reminder—you can’t stand out and fit in at the same time [Tweet; Image attached]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/chasejarvis/status/1041500744980082688

  • Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, X., & Shen, H. (2013). The research of “crossover” marketing strategy. In E. Qi, J. Shen, & R. Dou (Ed.), The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1363–1370. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-38442-4_143

  • Johnson, R. E. (1948). Fine arts as a means of personality integration. The School Review, 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, D. (1996). Review of Michael O'Toole’s the language of displayed art. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from Rhode Island School of Design: https://faculty.risd.edu/dkeefer/ldarev.htm

  • Kemlo, J. (2008). Different voices? Film and text or film as text: Considering the process of film adaptation from the perspective of discourse. MHRA Working Papers in the Humanities, 3, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. S. (2009, August 21). Multimodal discourse on online newspaper home pages: A social-semiotic perspective. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from The Sydney eScholarship Repository: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/7696

  • Kontoghiorghes, C. (2002). Predicting motivation to learn and motivation to transfer learning back to the job in a service organization: A new systemic model for training effectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2009). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal approach (pp. 54–66). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1998). Front pages. The critical analysis of newspaper layout. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 186–219). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996 [2006]). Reading images: The grammar of visual design . (2nd edn.) London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, L. (2018). House M.D. and creativity: A corpus linguistic systemic functional discourse analysis approach. Ph.D. Thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. PolyU Electronic Theses. https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/9777

  • Law, L. (2020). Creativity and multimodality: An analytical framework for creativity in multimodal texts (AFCMT). Linguistics and Human Sciences, 14(1–2), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.33598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, L. (2020). Enhancing digital literacy through the understanding of multimodal creativity in social media: a case study of Elon Musk's social-influencer discourse in his Twitter posts. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, L. & Fong, N. (2020). Applying partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in an investigation of undergraduate students’ learning transfer of academic English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. H. (2000). Training design factors influencing transfer of training to the workplace within an international context. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 52(2), 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Influence of trainee characteristics, instructional satisfaction, and organizational climate on perceived learning and training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(1), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, L., & Cullen, P. (2016). A multimodal approach in the classroom for creative learning and teaching. CASALC Review 2/2016-2017, 2, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec, R. (1998). Cohesion in action. Semiotica, 120(1–2), 168–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec, R. (2000). Types of processes in action. Semiotica, 130(3–4), 243–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec, R. (2001). Interpersonal resources in action. Semiotica, 135(1–4), 117–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, B., & Stein, M. I. (1955). Measures of intelligence and creativity. The Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • OFCA. (2019, March 12). Key communications statistics. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from Office of the Communications Authority: https://www.ofca.gov.hk/en/media_focus/data_statistics/key_stat/

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2007). Multimodal analysis and digital technology. In A. Baldry, & E. Montagna (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimodality: Theory and practice. Campobasso: Palladino.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Companion to discourse. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (2011). Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Smith, B., & Podlasov, A. (2010). Challenges in designing digital interfaces for the study of multimodal phenomena. Information Design Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. Cranbury: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, A. K. (2004). Making history in From Colony to Nation: A multimodal analysis of a museum exhibition in Singapore. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 28–54). London & New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. H., Lim, D. H., & Chang, J. H. (2017). Trainee versus supervisor assessment of training transfer: Mediational analysis of transfer variables. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55, 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1994). Contribution to the international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Retrieved December 3, 2018, from https://web.archive.org/web/20070208182842/http:/learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/traencyn.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, Digital immigrants, part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainsun, L. (2015, July 24). 再來一次,何足掛齒/林雨陽. Retrieved from 謎米音樂: https://news.memehk.com/posts/9004

  • Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC, 11, 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothemund, S. (Dir.). (1977). The fruit is ripe (Griechische feigen) [Motion Picture].

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, T. (2007a). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. Royce & W. L. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–109). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, T. (2007b). Multimodal communicative competence in second language contexts. In T. Royce & W. L. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 361–403). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, T., & Bowcher, W. (2007). New direction in the analysis of multimodal discourse. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Nemiro, J., & Walberg, H. J. (1998). Personal explicit theories of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Standard. (2018, September 18). Laughing in the face of the big blow. Retrieved from The Standard: https://www.thestandard.com.hk/section-news.php?id=200291

  • Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. R. (Eds.). (2011). Multimodal creativity and identities of expertise in the digital ecology of a World of Warcraft guild. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2008). Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education. London & New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2013). Re-configuring image-language relations and interpretive possibilities in picture books as animated movies: A site for developing multimodal literacy pedagogy. In V. V. Heberle (Ed.), Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literature in English and Cultural Studies, 15–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso, F. O., & Bateman, J. A. (2013). The multimodal construction of acceptability: Marvel’s Civil War comic books and the PATRIOT Act. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventola, E., Charles, C., & Kaltenbacher, M. (2004). Introduction. In E. Ventola, C. Charles, & M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on multimodality (pp. 1–6). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo, T. A., & Carter, R. (2010). What can a corpus tell us about creativity? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 302–315). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2012, May 28). Learning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge in web-based digital learning materials. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from The Sydney eScholarship Repository: Learning Through Multimedia Interaction: The Construal of Primary Social Science Knowledge in Web-based Digital Learning Materials: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/8376

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Locky Law .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Law, L. (2020). Creativity and Education: Facilitating Transfer of Learning Through Digital Creativity Multimodal Analysis (DCMA) of Social Media Posts. In: Lam, S.Sk. (eds) New Media Spectacles and Multimodal Creativity in a Globalised Asia . Digital Culture and Humanities, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7341-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics