Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Farm Mechanization: Nature of Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human-Centered Agriculture

Part of the book series: Design Science and Innovation ((DSI))

Abstract

Agriculture is in transition today, with the coexistence of traditional and mechanized farming. The mechanized inputs and resources have a direct bearing on timeliness and precision of farm operations, increase in production and productivity, higher income generation, reduction in crops and food losses, reduction in drudgery, and improvement in the farming work environment. This chapter elucidates the nature of farm mechanization that has been taking place across nations of the developed and the developing world. Farm mechanization connotes the application of machinery, tools, and devices as an alternative to those traditionally performed by bullocks, and other draught animals or by human labour. The machinery included here cover farm operations, such as soil tillage, planting, cultivation, forage harvesting, grain and fibre harvesting, vegetable, fruit and nut harvesting, transport and elevation, chemical applications, and sorting and packaging. Needless to indicate that farm mechanization scenario varies from region to region, and country to country. The scenario described here covers the countries of north and south America, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, China, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, the East and South African nations, and West and Central Africa. India is one of the first nations among the Asia-Pacific countries that fuelled the farm equipment market in the recent decades, with a surge in demand for machinery, like tractors, power tillers, combine harvesters, rotavators, threshers, and rice transplanters. Research studies indicate input variables to determine the level of mechanization or the mechanization index. Estimating the state of mechanization in smallholdings is a challenge since farm power utilization primarily comes from animate sources. The economic analysis is an approach to calculate the mechanization index by taking into account economic factors, i.e. the cost of using mechanical, animal, and human power. It is also a ratio of total mechanical power and the total power used in a particular crop but from an economic point of view. The human energy expenditure is an apparent critical factor in evaluating farm mechanization. The contribution elucidates various numerical expressions that have been attempted to arrive at the mechanization indices for application in cropping sectors. Besides, the ergonomics and safety issues in farm mechanization are elaborated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AghaAlikhani, M., Kazemi-Poshtmasari, H., & Habibzadeh, F. (2013). Energy use pattern in rice production: A case study from Mazandaran province, Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 69, 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akdemir, B. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in Turkey. IERI Procedia, 5, 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldi, F., Spugnoli, P., & Zoli, M. (1989). Energy efficiency in the vineyard. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 44, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaeian, N., & Zangeneh, M. (2011). Mechanization and economic analysis of wheat production in Iran. AMA-Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America, 42(4), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, D., & Nandi, A. K. (2014). Farm mechanisation and rationality of labour use in Indian agriculture: A frontier analysis of cost of cultivation data. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 336–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., Justice, S., & Lewis, D. (2011). Patterns of rural mechanisation, energy and employment in South Asia: reopening the debate. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canakci, M., Topakci, M., Akinci, I., & Ozmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 46(4), 655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in countries in transition in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & B. G. Sims (Eds.) Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management, (Vol. 20-2013, p. 336). Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, X., Cossar, F., Houssou, N., & Kolavalli, S. (2014). Mechanization in Ghana: Emerging demand, and the search for alternative supply models. Food Policy, 48, 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadavi, R., Keyhani, A., & Mohtasebi, S. S. (2010). Estimation of a mechanization index in apple orchard in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(4), 180–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2018). World food and agriculture - Statistical pocketbook (254 pp). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonteh, M. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in West and Central Africa. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & B. G. Sims (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (Vol. 20-2013, p. 336) Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisango, F. F. T., & Dzama, T. (2013). An assessment of agricultural mechanization index and evaluation of agricultural productivity of some fast track resettlement farms in Bindura district of Mashonaland Central Province: Zimbabwe. International Journal of Social science and Interdisciplinary Research, 2(7), 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajaseni, J. (1995). Energy analysis of wetland rice systems in Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 52(2–3), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, B. K. (2010). Determinants of farm mechanization in modern agriculture: A case study of Burdwan districts of West Bengal. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(12), 1107–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gite, L. P. (2008). Occupational Health and Safety Issues in Indian Agriculture – Present Scenario and Suggestions for Improvement. In Proceedings National Workshop, Management of Occupational Health and Safety Delivery: Scopes and Challenges, National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad, India, 30 Sept –1 Oct. 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI. (2019). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. (2018). Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokdogan, O., & Erdogan, O. (2018). Evaluation of energy balance in organic olive (Olea Europaea L.) production in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 60(1), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokdogan, O., Seydosoglu, S., Kokten, K., Bengu, A. S., & Baran, M. F. (2017). Energy input-output analysis of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and lupin (Lupinus albus L.) production in Turkey. Legume Research-An International Journal, 40(3), 526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimsby, L. K., Aune, J. B., & Johnsen, F. H. (2012). Human energy requirements in Jatropha oil production for rural electrification in Tanzania. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatibu, N. (2013). Investing in agricultural mechanization for development in East Africa. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & B. G. Sims (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (Vol. 20-2013, p 336) Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamedani, S. R., Shabani, Z., & Rafiee, S. (2011). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy, 36(5), 2367–2371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegazy, R., Schmidley, A., Bautista, E., Sumunistrado, D., Gummert, M., & Elepaño, A. (2013). Mechanization in Rice Farming—Lessons Learned from Other Countries. Asia Rice Foundation’s annual rice forum 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormozi, M. A., Asoodar, M. A., & Abdeshahi, A. (2012). Impact of mechanization on technical efficiency: A case study of rice farmers in Iran. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. Y., Huang, C. J., & Fu, T. T. (2002). Cultivation arrangements and the cost efficiency of rice farming in Taiwan. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(3), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2006a). Censo Agropecuário 2006 (p. 265). Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2006b). Censo agropecuário. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. S., & Shirazul, D. (2009). Farm mechanization for sustainable agriculture in Bangladesh: Problems and prospects. In 5th APCAEM Technical Committee Meeting and the Expert Group Meeting on Application of Agricultural Machinery for Sustainable Agriculture. United Nations Asian and Pacific Centre for Agricultural Engineering and Machinery, Manila, Philippines. (pp 14–16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, S., and Biggs, S. (2013). Rural and agricultural mechanization in Bangladesh and Nepal: Status, processes and outcomes. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & G. G. Sims (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (Vol. 20-2013, p. 336) Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, W. (2004). Country Report- Bangladesh. Governing Board/Technical Advisory Committee Meeting. 3rd Asian Pacific Center for Agricultural Engineering and Machinery, 2004. Vietnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosruzzaman, S., Asgar M.A., Karim, N. and Akbar, S. (2010). Energy intensity and productivity in relation to agriculture– Bangladesh perspective. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 6(4),615–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienzle, J., Ashburner, J. E., & Sims, B. G. (2013). Mechanization for rural development: a review of patterns and progress from around the world. Integrated Crop Management, 20. Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. p 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, S. D. (2009). Mechanization of Agriculture: Indian Scenario. Paper presented at the Fifth Session of the Technical Committee of the UNAPCAEM & Expert Group Meeting on Application of Agricultural Machinery for Sustainable Agriculture in the Asia-Pacific Region, Los Banos, the Philippines, October 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, K. (2018). Energy efficiency of intensive Rice production in Japan: An application of data envelopment analysis. Sustainability, 10(1), 120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, C. R., Chandel, N. S., & Senthilkumar, T. (2014a). Status, challenges and strategies for farm mechanization in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America, 45(4), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, C. R., Chandel, N. S., Senthilkumar, T., & Singh, K. K. (2014b). Trends of agricultural mechanization in India. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) Policy Brief, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(12), 3566–3570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, T. (2019). Situational Analysis and Usability Assessment of Farm Mechanization in Small and Marginal Holdings, Ph.D thesis, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute (RKMVERI), Belur, Howrah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottaleb, K. A., Krupnik, T. J., & Erenstein, O. (2016). Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muazu, A., Yahya, A., Ishak, W. I. W., & Khairunniza-Bejo, S. (2014). Machinery utilization and production cost of wetland, direct seeding paddy cultivation in Malaysia. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2, 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, P. K., & Nag, A. (2004). Drudgery, accidents and injuries in Indian agriculture. Industrial Health, 42(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawi, N. M., Yahya, A., Chen, G., Bockari-Gevao, S. M., & Maraseni, T. N. (2012). Human energy expenditure in lowland rice cultivation in Malaysia. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 18(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH. (2019). https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aginjury/default.html. Page last reviewed: October 9, 2019.

  • Nkakini, S. O., Ayotamuno, M. J., Ogaji, S. O. T., & Probert, S. D. (2006). Farm mechanization leading to more effective energy-utilizations for cassava and yam cultivations in Rivers State. Nigeria. Applied Energy, 83(12), 1317–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki, T. (1974). Examples of technical and economic analysis of mechanized processes in various agro-technical conditions. AGRI/MECH Report (UN)(ECE). no. 32/Add. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaoye, J. O., & Rotimi, A. O. (2010). Measurement of agricultural mechanization Index and analysis of agricultural productivity of some farm settlements in South west, Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-journal, 12(1), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Canavate, J., & Salvador, I. (1980). Effects of different mechanization levels in Spanish dryland farms. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia., 3(5), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paman, U., Inaba, S., & Uchida, S. (2014). The mechanization of small-scale rice farming: Labor requirements and costs. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 7(3), 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Doughty, R., Carothers, C., Lamberson, S., Bora, N., & Lee, K. (2002). Energy inputs in crop production in developing and developed countries. Food Security and Environmental Quality in the Developing World, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, F. C., Queiroz, D., M. and Resende, R. C. (2013). The development of farm mechanization in Brazil. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & B. E. Sims (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (Vol. 20-2013, p. 336) Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., Sefeedpari, P., & Rafiee, S. (2011). Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran. Energy, 36(10), 5824–5831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renpu, B. (2014). Analysis of the Trends of Agricultural Mechanization Development in China (2000-2020). ESCAP/CSAM Policy Brief, Issue, 1(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasouli, S. V., & Ranjbar, I. (2008). Determination of the degree, level and capacity indices for agricultural mechanization in Sarab Region. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 10, 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. C., & Singh, G. (2008). Agricultural mechanization in Bangladesh. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa & Latin America, 39(2), 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukuni, M. (1994). Getting agriculture moving in East and Southern Africa and a framework for action (No. REP-5551. CIMMYT.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samavatean, N., Rafiee, S., Mobli, H., & Mohammadi, A. (2011). An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield, costs and income of garlic production in Iran. Renewable Energy, 36(6), 1808–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simalenga, T. E. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in Southern African countries. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & B. G. Sims (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (Vol. 20-2013, p. 336) Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (2005). Scope, Progress and Constraints of Farm Mechanization in India. In K. Tyagi, H. Bathla, & S. Sharma (EDs.), Status of Farm Mechanization in India (pp. 48–56). New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. (2006). Estimation of a mechanisation index and its impact on production and economic factors—A case study in India. Biosystems Engineering, 93(1), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in India. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner & B. G. Sims (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (Vol. 20-2013, p. 336) Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. (2015). Agricultural mechanisation development in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. S., Singh, S., & Singh, S. P. (2015). Farm power and machinery availability on Indian farms. Agricultural Engineering Today, 39(1), 45–56.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stavis, B. (1978). The politics of agricultural mechanization in China. London, U.K.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari, V. K., Kumar, A. A., Kumar, S. P., & Nare, B. (2012). Farm mechanization status of West Bengal in India. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review, 1(6), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troujeni, M. E., Khojastehpour, M., Vahedi, A., & Emadi, B. (2018). Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and economic evaluation of pomegranate production in Iran. Information Processing in Agriculture, 5(1), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2014). U.S.Census of Agriculture 2012, United States. Summary and State Data. Volume 1: Geographic Series, Part 51. Report AC-12-A-51. United states Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S. R. (2006). Impact of agricultural mechanization on production, productivity, cropping intensity income generation and employment of labour. In K. Tyagi, H. Bathla, & S. Sharma, S. (Eds.), Status of farm mechanization in India (pp. 133–153). New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2013). China: Development of farm mechanization and the agricultural machinery industry. In J. Kienzle, J. E. Ashburner, & B. G. Sims, B. G. (Eds.), Mechanization for Rural Development- A review of patterns and progress from around the world, Integrated Crop Management (p. 336, Vol. 20-2013). Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • WAPCOS. (2018). Final report on Monitoring, concurrent evaluation and impact assessment of sub-mission on agricultural mechanization, Mechanization & Technology Division, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia.org. (2019). https://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture in the United States. Last reviewed 19th Feb 2020.

  • Yusof, Z., & Pebrian, D. (2016). Analysis of human energy expenditure in harvesting sugar palm (Arenga Pinnata Merr) in Malaysia. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR e-Journal, 18(1), 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangeneh, M., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2010). A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy, 35(7), 2927–2933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environment and Disaster Management, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute (Deemed University), Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    P. K. Nag

  2. AICRP, Ergonomics and Safety in Agriculture, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering (ICAR), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

    L. P. Gite

Authors
  1. P. K. Nag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. P. Gite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Nag .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nag, P.K., Gite, L.P. (2020). Farm Mechanization: Nature of Development. In: Human-Centered Agriculture . Design Science and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7269-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7269-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7268-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7269-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation