Skip to main content

The Chinese Genealogy of Financial Expertise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risky Expertise in Chinese Financialisation
  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter traces a Chinese genealogy of expertise to gauge the distinctiveness of Chinese financialisation. Chinese capitalism developed differently from Western capitalism (described as an “industrious revolution” instead of an “industrial revolution”) and diverges from the principles and rhetoric of Western laissez-faire, free-market performance in which financial discipline must be detached from the political sphere. Recalling Zhang Zhidong’s (1837–1909) slogan of “Chinese knowledge as a basis, foreign knowledge as a tool” during the first Chinese Modernisation and the “red and expert” policy from the first decades of the People’s Republic, the chapter highlights how political commitment and professional expertise form an indivisible unity for financial experts. The chapter examines financial expertise in relation to continuities and disruptions in terms of Chinese knowledge production along its unique capitalist path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I refer here to a multitude of thinkers (Tan Sitong, Gong Zizhen, etc.) who conceived modernisation in spiritual and cultural terms, and not in terms of economic development and strength. In their reflections they sourced traditional Chinese values such as “non-belligerency” and “community of property,” in order to heal the “evil of the Chinese souls.”

  2. 2.

    A derogatory expression the new intellectual referred to Confucianism.

  3. 3.

    Through the label kongjiadian (“shop of Confucius school”), Lu Xun and other revolutionaries mocked the precepts put into circulation that had been preached by traditionalists.

  4. 4.

    A striking example is the simultaneous use and beauty of Chinese writing.

  5. 5.

    These were classical scholars with various degrees of knowledge of the West and the modern world. They were considered the first generation of Chinese modern intellectuals.

  6. 6.

    This appears in a book entitled Modern Aesthetics System, published in the 1990s and edited by Ye Lang (1938–), a leading aesthetician at Beijing University. The book, written collectively by a group of young aestheticians with no individual author identified, was intended to work as a basic textbook for college students and readers nationwide introducing them to aesthetic theories using a new aesthetics model.

  7. 7.

    For example, the “beauty” of revolution in Mao Tse-tung’s poems, which are written in a traditional style.

  8. 8.

    Throughout the Chinese countryside, the ghost cities in China have resulted from huge real estate development projects, with no public services, commercial networks and connections. These projects are often the result of speculative investments coming from the government and have been called as a blatant manifestation of the incoming housing bubble.

  9. 9.

    In the language of executives and professionals, it is a new term that describes a blurring line between business and leisure.

References

  • Anagnost, Ann. 1995. A Surfeit of Bodies: Population and the Rationality of the State in Post-Mao China. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Faye D. Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp, 22–41. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. The Corporeal Politics of Quality (Suzhi). Public Culture 16 (2): 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrijasevic, Rutvica. 2009. Sex on the Move: Gender, Subjectivity and Differential Inclusion. Subjectivity 29 (1): 389–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Giovanni. 2006. Spatial fixes, switching Crises, and Accumulation by Dispossession. In: Chase-Dunn, C., Babones, S.J. (Eds.), Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited. Theory, Culture & Society 19 (4): 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregnbaek, Susanne. 2016. Fragile Elite: The Dilemmas of China’s Top University Students. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, Timothy, and Gregory Blue. 2002. China and Historical Capitalism: Genealogies of Sinological Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Damien, and Martjin Konings. 2017. Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Yuanpei. 1988. Yi Meiyu Dai Zongjiao Shuo [On Aesthetics as a Religion]. In Ershi Shiji Zhongguo Meishu Wenxuan, ed. Lang Shaojun, 15–19. Shanghai: Shanghai Shuhua Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin. 2015. The Knowledge Corrupters. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2014. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, William. 2016. The Limits of Neoliberalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, Nicholas. 2002. Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, Vanessa L. 2004. Only Hope: Coming of Age under China’s One-child Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Paradise Redefined: Transnational Chinese Students and the Quest for Flexible Citizenship in the Developed World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder. 1998. ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 2012. Neoliberalism and Its Prospects. In The Indispensable Milton Friedman: Essays on Politics and Economics, ed. L. Ebenstein. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumagalli, Andrea, and Sandro Mezzadra. 2010. Crisis in the Global Economy: Financial Markets, Social Struggles, and New Political Scenarios. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartman, David. 2000. Why Modern Architecture Emerged in Europe, Not America: The New Class and the Aesthetics of Technocracy. Theory, Culture & Society 17 (5): 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1999. Risk and Responsibility. The Modern Law Review 62 (1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Susan. 1994. Controlling Births and Bodies in Village China. American Ethnologist 21 (I): 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Planned Births, Unplanned Persons: Population in the Making of Chinese Modernity. American Ethnologist 30 (2): 196–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng ’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Susan, and Edwin A. Winckler. 2005. Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2001. Spaces of Capital. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Limits to Capital. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Fredrich. 2006. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Henry Yuhuai. 2001. Dictionary of the Political Thought of the People’s Republic of China. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen Henrietta Macartney Robbins and Macartney, George. 2011[1908]. Our First Ambassador to China: An Account of the Life of George, Earl of Macartney, with Extracts from His Letters, and the Narrative of His Experiences in China, as Told by Himself, 1737–1806. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Lisa. 2006. Autonomous Choices and Patriotic Professionalism: On Governmentality in Late-socialist China. Economy and Society 35 (4): 550–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Patriotic Professionalism in Urban China: Fostering Talent. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Shueping. 2014. Xin de shiqi Deng Xiaoping zhongshi haiwai huaqiao huaren zuoyong lunxi (Deng Xiaoping’s Emphasis on the Role of the Chinese Expatriates in the New Era). Dangdai Zhongguoshi Yanjiu 5: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Rebecca. 2017. The Magic of Concepts: History and the Economic in Twentieth Century China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, Andrew B. 2006. Suzhi: A Keyword Approach. China Quarterly 186: 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings, Martijn. 2018. Capital and Time: For a New Critique of Neoliberal Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, Emanuele. 2014. Review of Dardot & Laval’s The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. Theory Culture and Society. Accessed October 12, 2017. https://www.theoryculturesociety.org/review-of-dardot-lavals-the-new-way-of-the-world-on-neoliberal-society/.

  • Li, Jun, Yuli Zhang, and Harry Matlay. 2003. Entrepreneurship Education in China. Education+Training 45 (8/9): 495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Chun. 2013. China and Global Capitalism: Reflections on Marxism, History, and Contemporary Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Kang. 2000. Aesthetics and Marxism: Chinese Aesthetic Marxists and Their Western Contemporaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Xun. 1960. Diary of a Madman and Other Stories. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Tse-Tung. 1963. Where Do Correct Ideas Come from? https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-9/mswv9_01.htm.

  • ———. 1966. Chairman Mao’s Little Red Book. Beijing: Chinese Peoples Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Mao Tse-Tung: An Anthology of His Writings. Edited by Anne Jackson Fremantle. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017 [1937]. On Practise and Contradiction. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Randy. 2015. Coming Up Short: Knowledge Limits and the Decomposition of the Professional Managerial Class. International Critical Thought 5 (1): 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1998. The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra, Sandro. 2010. Living in Transition: Toward a Heterolingual Theory of the Multitude. In The Politics of Culture: Around the Work of Naoki Sakai, ed. Richard Calichman and John Namjun, 121–137. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2012. “Borderscapes of Differential Inclusion: Subjectivity and Struggles on the Threshold of Justice’s Excess.” In The Borders of Justice, ed. Étienne Balibar, Sandro Mezzadra, and Ranabir Samaddar, 181–203. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Hyman P. 1996. Uncertainty and the Institutional Structure of Capitalist Economies: Remarks upon Receiving the Veblen-Commons Award. Journal of Economic Issues 30 (2): 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 2004. The Effortless Economy of Science? Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe, eds. 2015. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, with a New Preface. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. How Neoliberalism Makes Its World: The Urban Property Rights Project in Peru. In The Road from Mont Pèlerin The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Mritiunjoy. 2012. The Rise of the East: A Non-Western Path? In Liber Ami-corum Peter Leuprecht: Essays in Honour of Peter Leuprecht, ed. Olivier Delas and Michaela Leuprecht, 461–482. Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, Barry. 2007. The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Aihwa, and Zhang Li. 2008. Privatising China: Socialism from Afar. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Elizabeth J. 2007. Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution? The China Journal 57: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, Karl-Heinz. 2009. Identity and Hybridity—Chinese Culture and Aesthetics in the Age of Globalisation. In Intercultural Aesthetics, ed. Anton Van den Braembussche et al., 87–103. Rotterdam: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 2000 (1962). The Republic of Science. Minerva 1 (1): 54–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzana, Claudia, and Alessandro Russo. 2011. Continuity/Discontinuity: China’s Place in the Contemporary World. Critical Asian Studies 43 (2): 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, Ngai. 2003. Subsumption or Consumption? The Phantom of Consumer Revolution in Globalising China. Cultural Anthropology 18 (4): 469–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rethel, Lena. 2018. Capital Market Development in Southeast Asia: From Speculative Crisis to Spectacles of Financialization. Economic Anthropology 5 (2): 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickett, W. Allyn. 2015. Chinese Approaches to Literature from Confucius to Liang Ch’i-ch’ao. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rofel, Lisa. 2007. Desiring China. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak, Theodore. 1969. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodian, Quinn. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Jonathan D. 2013. The Search for Modern China. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara, Kaoru. 2003. The East Asian Path of Economic Development: A Long-term Perspective. In The Resurgence of East Asia: 500, 150 and 50 Year Perspectives, ed. Giovanni Arrighi, Takeshi Hamashita, and Mark Selden, 1–23. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Yat-sen. 1943. San Min Chu I, The Three Principles of the People. Ministry of Information of the Republic of China. Taipei: China Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooze, Adam. 2018. Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Robin. 2010. Cities Surround the Countryside: Urban Aesthetics in Postsocialist China. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Hui. 2003. China’s New Order. Society, Politics, Economy in Transition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Scientific Worldview, Culture Debates, and the Reclassification of Knowledge in Twentieth-century China. Boundary 2 35 (2): 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The End of the Revolution: China and the Limits of Modernity. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Andrew Chun. 2013. Historical Capitalism and the Rise of the Global Approach to Chinese Economic History: Giovani Arrighi, Arif Dirlik and Wang Hui. The Corvette 1 (1): 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Xudong. 2008. Postsocialism and Cultural Politics: China in the Last Decade of the Twentieth Century. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Dal Maso .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dal Maso, G. (2020). The Chinese Genealogy of Financial Expertise. In: Risky Expertise in Chinese Financialisation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6824-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6824-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6823-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6824-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics