Skip to main content

CSR, Corporate Heritage Identity and Social Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance and Sustainability

Abstract

Prevailing approaches to the structural challenges of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) tend to be monolithic and skewed towards CSR at the organisational level. Albeit, mirroring CSR at the organisational level with activities of practitioners at the social level can offer new reflexive approaches for identifying capabilities for and understanding thresholds of social learning. This chapter maps out how identity perspectives to CSR can offer new approaches for surfacing emergent properties inherent in the uptake of CSR institutionally and in practice. The chapter also presents an overview of the interplay between structure and agency (prescribed and actual CSR practices) and its underlying instrumental role for illuminating systemic factors which perpetuate such capabilities and thresholds. Using a morphogenetic theory of change, the chapter offers a framework for approaching CSR-based corporate identity. Empirical evidence from the applied framework is thereafter presented, in the context of the agro-processing industry based on a content analysis of annual reports, in-depth-interview data generated from four sustainability managers and corporate communication officers and the practices of extension and Local Economic Development (LED) officers. The framework demonstrates that companies with a disintegrated CSR identity inherently have more capacity to be change agents. Similarly, a strong corporate heritage identity is not indicative of a reciprocal link between espoused values and activity. Conversely, an enduring corporate heritage identity may not necessarily be improvisatory for social learning. In conclusion, the chapter gives an overview of a taxonomy of agential capabilities and associated cognitive resources inherent in the interaction between structural-cultural and personal emergent properties, which can initiate the positioning of social learning at the forefront of organisational deliberations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that Archer does not separate these in reality, but only analytically.

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Greenwich: CT JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2011). Morphogenesis: Realism’s explanatory framework. In: M. S. Archer (Ed.), Sociological realism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucamp, I. C. (2015). Social Impact Assessment as a tool for social development in South Africa: An exploratory study. PhD thesis, University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babarinde, O. A. (2009). Bridging the economic divide in the Republic of South Africa: A corporate social responsibility perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51, 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. (2007). Identity studies: Multiple perspectives and implications for corporate-level marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 765–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. (2013). Corporate heritage, corporate heritage marketing, and total corporate heritage communications: What are they? What of them? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 290–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., & Burghausen, M. (2015). Explicating corporate heritage, corporate heritage brands and organisational heritage. Journal of Brand Management, 22, 364–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., & Burghausen, M. (2018). Marketing, the past and corporate heritage. Marketing Theory. 1470593118790636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., Fukukawa, K., & Gray, E. R. (2007). The nature and management of ethical corporate identity: A commentary on corporate identity, corporate social responsibility and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., & Greyser, S. A. (2002). Managing the multiple identities of the corporation. California Management Review, 44, 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., Powell, S. M., & Greyser, S. A. (2011). Explicating ethical corporate marketing. Insights from the BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe: The ethical brand that exploded and then imploded. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., & Soenen, G. B. (1997). Operationalising the concept of corporate identity: Articulating the corporate identity mix and the corporate identity management mix. Strathclyde: Department of Marketing, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., & Soenen, G. B. (1999). The acid test of corporate identity management™. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. T. (2009). Corporate marketing: Apocalypse, advent and epiphany. Management Decision, 47, 544–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. T., Stuart, H., & Greyser, S. A. (2009). Aligning identity and strategy: Corporate branding at British airways in the late 20th century. California Management Review, 51, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkigt, K., & Stadler, M. M. (1986). Corporate identity, grundlagen, funktionen und fallspielen. Landsberg an Lech: Verlag Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanding, M. 2014. The surprising link between language and corporate responsibility. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2014/03/24/the-surprising-link-between-language-and-corporate-social-responsibility/#30bb5d211660. Accessed on July 3 2020.

  • Blundel, R., Ippolito, K., & Donnarumma, D. (2013). Effective organisational communication: Perspectives, principles and practices. Pearson Education: Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, R., Matute, J., & Pina, J. M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to reveal the corporate identity: A study focused on the websites of Spanish financial entities. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: A case study of consumers’ perception of McDonald’s use of CSR in relation to image and reputation. Bachelors Degree, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghausen, M., & Balmer, J. M. (2014). Corporate heritage identity management and the multi-modal implementation of a corporate heritage identity. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2311–2323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 972–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. (2014). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartey-Baah, K., & Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2011). Exploring the limits of Western corporate social responsibility theories in Africa. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 126–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luque, M. S., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 626–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15, 282–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, D. 2010. The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 2018. 25 Years ago I coined the phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” here’s why it’s time to rethink it. https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it. Accessed on July 4 2020.

  • Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD, & ILO. (2010). Agricultural value chain development: Threat or opportunity for women’s employment?. In: S. D. Villard (Ed.), Gender and rural employment policy brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, D., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: A corporate marketing perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45, 1353–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijabadeniyi, A. (2018). Exploring corporate marketing optimisation strategies for the KwaZulu-Natal manufacturing sector: A corporate social responsibility perspective. Marketing and Retail Management. Durban: Durban University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2008). Business logic for sustainability. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In: R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P., & Woodhouse, P. (2017). Crisis and differentiation among small-scale sugar cane growers in Nkomazi, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 43, 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibert, C., Monroe, M., Peterson, A., Plate, R., & Thiele, L. (2012). Working toward sustainability: Ethical decision making in a technological world. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Thornhill, C. J. (2003). Niklas Luhmann’s theory of politics and law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleyn, N., Abratt, R., Chipp, K., & Goldman, M. (2012). Building a strong corporate ethical identity. California Management Review, 54, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapitsa, C. B., & Khumalo, L. (2018). Diagnosing monitoring and evaluation capacity in Africa. African Evaluation Journal, 6, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 28–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. (2006). A general dynamic capability: Does it propagate business and social competencies in the retail food industry? Journal of Management Studies, 43, 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, L. M. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in banking: what we know, what we don't know, and what we should know. In: The Routledge companion to financial services marketing. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrack, P. (2007). Individual personality factors that affect normative beliefs about the rightness of corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 46, 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazari, K., Parvizi, M., & Emami, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: Approaches and perspectives. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research, 3, 554–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndhlovu, P. T. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and corporate social investment in South Africa: The South African Case. Journal of African Business, 12, 72–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otubanjo, O. (2012). Theorising the interconnectivity between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate identity. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3, 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpora, D. (2007). On Elder-Vass: Refining a refinement. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S. M. (2011). The nexus between ethical corporate marketing, ethical corporate identity and corporate social responsibility: An internal organisational perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45, 1365–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S. M., Elving, W. J. L., Dodd, C., & Sloan, J. (2009). Explicating ethical corporate identity in the financial sector. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14, 440–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, P. M., Tekleab, A. G., Levi, A., & Lichtman, C. (2015). Translating CSR into managerial behavior: Determinants of charitable donation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Aguilera, R. V. (2011). Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): An application of organizational justice, self-determination, and social influence theories. Managerial Ethics: Managing the Psychology of Morality, pp. 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Wright, P. M., Aryee, S., & Luo, Y. (2011). Special issue on ‘behavioral ethics, organizational justice, and social responsibility across contexts.’ Management and Organization Review, 7, 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 599–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • SASA. (2017). The South African Sugar Industry. https://www.sasa.org.za/HomePage1.aspx. Accessed on July 4 2020.

  • Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • StatsSA. (2013). A giant step in agriculture statistics. http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=1447. Accessed July 2 2020.

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 463–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (2000). Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 854–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theuvsen, L., Heyder, M., & Niederhut-Bollmann, C. (2010). Does strategic group membership affect firm performance? An analysis of the german brewing industry. Göttingen: GJAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). Evolutionary governance theory: An introduction. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbos, A. K., Gerard, J. A., Forshey, P. R., Harding, C. S., & Miller, J. S. (2007). The positive ethical organization: Enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Loeper, W., Musango, J., Brent, A., & Drimie, S. (2016). Analysing challenges facing smallholder farmers and conservation agriculture in South Africa: A system dynamics approach, 2016(19), 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2010). Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. In: Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 109–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study reported in this chapter was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abosede Ijabadeniyi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ijabadeniyi, A., Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2020). CSR, Corporate Heritage Identity and Social Learning. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) Governance and Sustainability. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6370-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics