Abstract
In this article, we present the case of sugar cane farming and crushing in Maharashtra in India. This is an Arche-typical case of ethical dilemmas and climate justice in the transition of industrial civilization to become a more environmentally sustainable society. The dilemmas of the case are central to the challenges that we face with regard to the need to change our life-styles and modes of production in the contemporary industrial civilization. The sugar cane farming and agriculture of Maharashtra are central to the economy of the region. Sugar cane cultivation is important for the mode of production of the region. The government has been promoting this agriculture as a part of development of the region in the country. Sugar production has become central to industrialization and survival of stakeholder in the region. However, this production is also very costly for the environment, in particular with regard to use of water, which has led to shortage of water and depletion of ground water. Moreover, the farmers involved in sugar cane farming are also facing distress because of reduction of the price of sugar due to overproduction. In addition, the production has led to increased destruction of the soil in the region, In this situation, government faces many dilemmas of policy. A ban on sugar cane production has been recommended, but local stakeholders are critical to this because of the damage for the farmers who will lose their grounds of existence. Another option is slower transition to sustainability, but it is not clear how such change can be implemented. Thus in this paper, with a hermeneutic case-study we discuss the ethical dimensions of this situation. We discuss the case in terms of cosmopolitan business ethics, sustainability, responsibility, consequentialism, theory of justice and Sen’s justice approach of the development in order to find the correct sustainable solution for the future. We conclude that the practice of sugar cane farming and agriculture of Maharashtra is unethical and should be stopped immediately.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhaskar, R. N. (2017). Maharashtra's agriculture conundrum: How sugarcane politics roiled other nutrition crops in the State, FIRSTPOST, June 06, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from https://www.firstpost.com/business/maharashtras-agriculture-conundrum-how-sugarcane-politics-roiled-other-nutrition-crops-over-years-3522263.htm.
Bonnafous-Boucher, M., & Rendtorff, J. D. (2016). Stakeholder theory: A model for strategic management. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Cham. Springer Briefs in Ethics.
The Businessline. (2019). Government nod to create 4 million tonnes of sugar buffer stock: To bear Rs. 1674 Crore, 24 July 2019. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/govt-nod-to-create-4-million-tonnes-sugar-buffer-stock-to-bear-1674-cr/article28700012.ece.
Comoditiescontrol. (2017, August 7). Area under Sugarcane Cultivation Rises 9% In India Y/Y. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://www.commoditiescontrol.com/eagritrader/common/newsdetail.php?type=MKN&itemid=486459&cid1=,6,&varietyid=,25.
David, Tilman*., Kenneth, G., Cassman‡, Pamela, A., Matson§||, Rosamond, N., & Stephen P. (2002, August 8). Nature, 418, 671–677.
Directorate of Economics, Economic Survey of Maharashtra, 201–2012. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/economic%2520survey%2520of%2520maharashtra%25202011-2012.pdf.
Ghadyalpatil, A. (2016). Sugar cane vs Marathwada’s drought, Livemint. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from https://www.livemint.com/Politics/nQRjnZEiHI9BWrGb11x51L/Sugar-cane-vs-Marathwadas-drought.html.
Guhathakurta and Rajeevan. (2008). Trends in the rainfall pattern over India. International Journal of Climatology, 28, 1453–1469.
India Today. (2018). New details revealed about Indus Valley Civilization: Why did these people disappear? Retrieved Decemer 28, 2018, from https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/new-details-revealed-about-indus-valley-civilization-why-did-the-people-disappear-1389828-2018-11-16.
Lorentzen, J. (2009). Global sugar, regional water and local people: EU sugar regime liberalization, rural livelihoods and the environment in the Incomati River Basin. South African Journal of Science, 105, 49–53.
NCIWRD. (1999). Integrated water resources development, a plan for the action, report of the national commission for integrated water resources development. Ministry of water resources, Vol. 1. Government of India.
Rendtorff, J. D. (2009). Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Copenhagen Business School Press.
Rendtorff, J. D. (2015). Case studies, ethics, philosophy and liberal learning for the management profession. Journal of Management Education, 39(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914562282
Rendtorff, J. D. (Ed.). (2017). Perspectives on philosophy of management and business ethics: Including a special section on business and human rights (p. 51). Springer, Cham: Ethical Economy, no.
Rendtorff, JD (2018), Cosmopolitan Business Ethics: Towards a Global Ethos of Management. Routledge, London. Finance, Governance and Sustainability: Challenges to Theory and Practice Series.
Rendtorff, J. D. (2019). Philosophy of management and sustainability: Rethinking business ethics and social responsibility in sustainable development. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Schneider, L. (2010). A sweeter alternative for whom? Sugarcane ethanol production and rural livelihoods in Northeast Brazil. American University.
Scroll.in. (2019). Why a temporary ban on sugarcane cultivation in Maharashtra is a good idea. Retrieved Sptember 2, from https://scroll.in/article/753300/why-a-temporary-ban-on-sugarcane-cultivation-in-maharashtra-is-a-good-idea.
Shrivastava, A. K., Srivastava, A. K., & Solomon, S. (2011). Sustaining sugarcane productivity under depleting water resources. Current Science, 101(6), 748–754.
Sinha Ray, & Srivastava. (2000, June). Climate changes; extreme rainfall events; flood risk. Journal of Earth System Science, 120(3), pp. 359–373.
Smit, B., & Cai, Y. (1994). Sustainability in agriculture: A general review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 49, 299–307.
Srinivas, N. N. (2015). Sugarcane suicides: Only farmers can solve the crisis, Economic Times Blog. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/something-fresh/sugarcane-suicides-only-farmers-can-solve-the-crisis/.
Thakkar, H. (2013, June). How efficient is Maharashtra’s sugarcane crop? South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People, 1–3.
Vyas, S. (2018). Maharashtra to revive 40 defunct sugar mills. The Hindu, 24 November. Retrieved December 18, 2018, from https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/maharashtra-to-revive-40-defunct-sugar-mills/article25588703.ece.
Waswa F., & Godfrey, W. (2014, March). Netondo, integrating sustainability ethics in commercial sugarcane farming in the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 3(1), 123–140.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Develop- ment). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WZWP. (2016). Position paper droughts and sugar industry in Maharashtra—Are we learning from history?
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bandyopadhyay, P.K., Rendtorff, J.D., Pandey, B. (2020). Ethics of Sugar Cane Farming and Crushing in Maharashtra. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) Governance and Sustainability. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6370-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6370-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6369-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6370-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)