Skip to main content

The Continuing Development of Governance: International Divergences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance and Sustainability

Abstract

This chapter discusses the need for the global regulation of international markets and the problems with establishing any form of regulation for these. It does so in the context of governance as the central platform for any kind of management and control. It contrasts the regulation of markets for goods and services with the market for international finance to show significant differences. It discusses collaborative approaches and the limited success achieved and also the various bodies which perform some kind of international regulation. A central theme of the chapter is that globalisation makes. Need for international regulation more important but does not offer solutions. It is therefore argued that governance is the key to the successful operation of global activity. In doing so, this chapter serves as an introduction to the theme of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The movement of people from the Middle East and Africa into Europe has, however, become an issue since 2014 and has arguably contributed to the vote by British people to leave the European Union.

  2. 2.

    See Crowther (2009a, b) for a detailed consideration of the context of governance within the world economic system.

  3. 3.

    What is often ignored is that it is only in a perfect competition status that a completely unregulated free market can work, which means never. It is simply a construct in economic theory.

  4. 4.

    Extremism—both political and religious—is partly caused by this turbulence.

  5. 5.

    This assumption is actually made explicit by Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics. It has also been made explicit by the US government during the era of G W Bush although this has become noticeably more silent during the era of Obama as president. We await what will happen during the Bush era of ‘putting America first’.

  6. 6.

    Lloyd used the example of unregulated grazing on common land in his example.

  7. 7.

    Article 17 states that ‘no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property’ and regulation would have this effect.

  8. 8.

    https://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com accessed 14/3/2017.

  9. 9.

    The system is based on the concept of perfect competition which is taught in introductory economics (e.g. Lipsey and Chrystal 2015) but rejected thereafter. It is based on the assumptions that there are sufficient buyers and sellers so that none of them is large enough to influence the market. In reality the number of sellers is small and continues to become smaller through mergers and acquisitions until a very few sellers have a great power imbalance in their favour when compared to the individuals who are buyers.

  10. 10.

    General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.

  11. 11.

    https://www.world-governance.org/spip.php?rubrique6&lang=en accessed 14/3/2107.

  12. 12.

    The European Union was a prime example of this in 2006 with inevitable closer union seeming likely. Subsequent events have placed doubt upon this closer union and there is even a strong degree of questioning of the continuing role of the EU.

  13. 13.

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/jun/09/fifa-reform-manifesto-football-sepp-blatter accessed 14/3/2017.

  14. 14.

    See www.unglobalcompact.org.

  15. 15.

    One of the causes of the crisis was that these packages were not understood by anyone (The Economist Sept 7 2013) and just accepted—in which case this form of investing is no different to gambling such as Russian Roulette and decries any claim of the efficient market hypothesis (Malkiel 1991).

  16. 16.

    Even the previous US regime (led by Obama) admitted the existence of deficiency in regulation which has been very helpful to the creation of this situation, although the current (Trump) regime appears to think the opposite.

References

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2007). Sustainable corporate social responsibility and the value chain. In D. Crowther, & M. M. Zain (Eds.), New perspectives on corporate social responsibility (pp. 109–128).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., Santonu, B., & Sushanta, M. (2005). Financial globalisation: The need for a single currency and a global central bank. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(3), 507–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R. (2006). International financial reporting standards (IFRS): Pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, 36(supp 1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, I., & Vass, P. (2005). Self—regulation and the regulatory state—A survey of policy and practice; Report No 17, Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries; University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassil, Y. (2012). The 2003 Iraq war: Operations, causes and consequences. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(5), 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B., & Westbrook, D. A. (1998). Confronting asymmetry: Global financial markets and national regulation. International Finance, 1(2), 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1834). Deontology or the science of morality. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Browne, Green, and Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2013). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., Coglianese, C., & Levi-Faur, D. (2007). Can regulation make a difference? Regulation and Governance, 1(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulloch, J., & Darwish, A. (1993). Water wars: Coming conflicts in the middle east. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, W. A., & Rosenblum, M. R. (2005). Immigration and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D., (2009). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in context. In G. Aras, & D. Crowther, (Eds.), Global perspectives on corporate governance and CSR (pp. 1–41). Springer: Farnham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabel, I. (2003). Averting crisis? Assessing measures to manage financial integration in emerging economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (1996). Corporate performance operates in three dimensions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 11(8), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2009), Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in context. In G. Aras, & D. Crowther, (Eds.), Global perspectives on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (pp. 1–41). Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2011), The utilitarian fallacy. In G. Aras, & D. Crowther, (Eds.), Governance in the business environment (pp 71–90). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D., & Seifi, S. (2011). Corporate governance and international business. Copenhagen: Ventus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, D. K. (2006). Globalization in the world of finance: An analytical history. Global Economy Journal, 6(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Rosa, D., & Malyshev, N. (2008). Regulatory institutions: A blueprint for the Russian federation. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance; No. 10; OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/241530366501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2002a). Strengthening the framework for the global economy. Washington DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2002b). Working for a better globalisation. Washington DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G. L., Reinhart, C. M., & Vegh, C. A. (2003). The unholy trinity of financial contagion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, M. (1998). Developing countries and the globalisation of financial markets. Word Development, 26(7), 1185–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R., & Chrystal, A. (2015). Economics (13th ed.). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, W. F. (1833). Two lectures on the checks to population; Oxford: JSTOR 1972412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. J. (1991). Efficient market hypothesis. In J. Eatwell, et al. (Eds.), The World of Economics (pp 211–218). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, K. (2004). Financial markets globalisations; symmetry-breaking and endogenous inequality of nations. Econometrica, 72(3), 853–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroidis, P. C. (2015). The regulation of international trade. Cambridge: MA.; MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1968). War and peace in the global village. San Francisco: Hardwire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshirian, F. (2002). New international financial architecture. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 12, 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshirian, F. (2011). The global financial crisis and the evolution of markets, institutions and regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(1), 14–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Consumer Council. (1989). In the absence of competition: A consumers view of public utilities regulation. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H. (2002). Globalisation of financial markets and the asian crisis: Some lessons for third world developing countries. Journal of Third World Studies, 19(2), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1957). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. (1987). The correlates of change in international finance regulation. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 531–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. C. (2011). The case for regulation. The International Economy, Fall 2011, 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J., (1999). Toward an ontology for global governance. In M. Hewson, & T. J. Sinclair, (Eds.). Approaches to global governance theory, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Tornell, A., & Velasco, A., (1996). Financial crises in emerging markets: the lessons from 1995, NBER Working Paper No 5576, published as Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 27(1), 147–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifi, S., & Crowther, D. (2016). The governance of sustainable development. In D. Crowther, & L. Lauesen, (Eds.), Accountability and social responsibility: International perspectives, Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (1981). Resolving the tragedy of the commons by creating private property rights in wildlife. Cato Journal, 1(2), 439–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., & Solomon, A. (2004). Corporate governance and accountability. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. (2005). The limits of financial globalisation. Journal of Finance, LX(4), 1595–1638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2006). The UN and global governance: an idea and its prospects. Chicago: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (2000). Financial globalisation. World Development, 28(6), 1101–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, B. L. (2003). Final accounting: Ambition, greed and the fall of Arthur Andersen. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veljanovski, C. (1988). Selling the state –privatization in Britain, Weidenfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veljanovski, C. (1991). The regulation game. In C. Veljanovski, (Ed.), Regulators and the market: An assessment of the growth of regulation in the UK. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. (2002). Industrialisation and globalisation: Theory and evidence from developing countries. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction—cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Crowther .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (2020). The Continuing Development of Governance: International Divergences. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) Governance and Sustainability. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6370-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics