Skip to main content

The Theory of Attachment in Contexts of Public and Social Marketing: Study of the Program “Portugal Sou Eu”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CSR and Sustainability in the Public Sector

Abstract

The brand has an identifying function since it allows to differentiate the products and/or services existing in the market, through a name, term, sign, and symbol, or a combination of all these elements. The identity of the brand can be adapted according to the needs and desires of its target audience, in order to foster recognition and create an emotional link with it. This cognitive and affective bond is called the attachment theory, and it is defined by the attachment between an individual and a brand, in such a way that, when the connection is strong, it will see it as an extension of itself, being part of its characterization. In the context of this study, we will also analyze public and social marketing focusing on the “Portugal Sou Eu” program, an initiative of the Ministry of Economy. This initiative aims to support and stimulate the national supply, aiming to promote the informed consumption and valorization of Portuguese products and services, with the aim of increasing competitiveness and job creation in Portuguese companies, especially in small and medium-sized enterprises. Based on a totally qualitative approach, this study intends to analyze the influence of the theory of attachment at the time of purchase, noting if there is predisposition of the sample to consume products of Portuguese brands adhering to the program, instead of others of different origin. For this proposed, was realized a focus group (10 participants) with portuguese consumers, three face-to-face interviews with affiliated companies (Minhofumeiro, Life in a Bag and Marsil), another by e-mail (Nacional) and an interview with the entity responsible for coordinating the program (Associação Empresarial de Portugal). The results suggest that there is low recognition of the brand “Portugal Sou Eu” and, consequently, the affective bond, by the consumers, proved to be weak, with a prioritization of the price. The business fabric pointed to the lack of bet on strategies of dissemination that fit the type of business of each company and allow an increase of its notoriety, as for example, the lack of presence in international fairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building Strong Brands. sl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D. A. & Joachimsthaler, E. (2012). Brand leadership. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, A. R. (1994). Social marketing: Its definition and domain. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M., Luo, X., Fang, Z., & Aspara, J. (2014). Cause marketing effectiveness and the moderating role of price discounts. Journal of Marketing,78(6), 120–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin,130(1), 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. & Schmidt, M. (2010). How strong is the business-to-business brand in the workforce? An empirically-tested model of ‘internal brand equity’ in a business-to-business setting. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1250–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research,59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research,15(2), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,52(4), 664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Hewstone, M. E. (2004). Self and social identity. Blackwell publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, C. (2010). Uma abordagem relacional ao valor da marca. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão,9(1–2), 49–63. [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. M., & Harris, M. (1999). Social identity in an emerging consumer market: How you do the wash may say a lot about who you think you are. ACR North American Advances.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Araújo, E. T. (2011). Marketing social aplicado a causas públicas: Cuidados e desafios metodológicos no planejamento das mudanças de comportamentos, atitudes e práticas sociais. Pensamento & Realidade. Revista do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Administração-FEA. ISSN 2237-4418, 26(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, K., & Scholl, N. (1998). Positioning qualitative market research: Reflections from theory and practice. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,1(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Ballester, E. (2004). Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories: A multigroup invariance analysis. European Journal of Marketing,38(5/6), 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2th ed.). SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research,32(3), 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research,24(4), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasquet, M., Mollá Descals, A., & Ruiz-Molina, M. E. (2017). Understanding loyalty in multichannel retailing: the role of brand trust and brand attachment. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management,45(6), 608–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghodeswar, B. M. (2008). Building brand identity in competitive markets: A conceptual model. Journal of Product & Brand Management,17(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, A. S. (1995). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de administração de empresas,35(2), 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heere, B., & James, J. D. (2007). Stepping outside the lines: Developing a multi-dimensional team identity scale based on social identity theory. Sport Management Review,10(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P., & Stamey, M. (1990). The homeless in America: An examination of possessions and consumption behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research,17(3), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J., & Sung, E. (2008). Consumer-based brand equity: Comparisons among Americans and South Koreans in the USA and South Koreans in Korea. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal,12(1), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiya, A. S. M., da Costa Hernandez, J. M., Xavier, A. K. S., & Ramos, D. B. (2018). A importância do apego à marca para o engajamento em causas de responsabilidade social corporativa. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas,58(6), 564–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J. N. (1991). Marcas—capital de empresa. Lisboa: Edições CETOP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J.-N. (2008). The new strategic brand management: Creating and sustaining brand equity long term (4th ed.). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. The Journal of Marketing, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzel, S., & Vaux Halliday, S. (2008). Investigating antecedents and consequences of brand identification. Journal of Product & Brand Management,17(5), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levek, A. R. H. C. (2002). A responsabilidade social e sua interface com o marketing social. Revista da FAE5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisjak, M., Lee, A. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (2012). When a threat to the brand is a threat to the self: The importance of brand identification and implicit self-esteem in predicting defensiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,38(9), 1120–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, G. S., & Lamb, C. W., Jr. (2000). The measurement and dimensionality of brand associations. Journal of Product & Brand Management,9(6), 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing,75(4), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N.K., Baalbaki, I. B., & Bechwati, N. N. (2013). Marketing research an applied orientation (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D. G., & DeMoss, M. (1990). Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. Journal of Consumer Research,17(3), 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer affairs,35(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, R. W. (2005). Consumer-based brand equity: Improving the measurement–empirical evidence. Journal of Product & Brand Management,14(3), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., & Priester, J. (2008). Brand attachment: Constructs, consequences, and causes. Foundations and Trends® in Marketing1(3), 191–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, S., Bianchi, C., Kerr, G., & Patti, C. (2010). Consumer-based brand equity for Australia as a long-haul tourism destination in an emerging market. International Marketing Review,27(4), 434–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruão, T. (2017). Marcas e identidades: guia da concepção e gestão das marcas comerciais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santesmases, M. (2004). Marketing: conceptos y estrategias (5. a edición).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research,22(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research,38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research,66(10), 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009). The importance of a general measure of brand engagement on market behavior: Development and validation of a scale. Journal of Marketing Research,46(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology,15(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, R., Bond, E., & Baer, R. (2001). Building service brands via social identity: Lessons from the sports marketplace. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,9(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,37(2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahyuni, D. (2012). The research design maze: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. (2000). Brands and brand equity: Definition and management. Management Decision,38(9), 662–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdravkovic, S., Magnusson, P., & Stanley, S. M. (2010). Dimensions of fit between a brand and a social cause and their influence on attitudes. International Journal of Research in Marketing,27(2), 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Cardoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cardoso, A., Sousa, B. (2020). The Theory of Attachment in Contexts of Public and Social Marketing: Study of the Program “Portugal Sou Eu”. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) CSR and Sustainability in the Public Sector. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6366-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics