Skip to main content

Oncoplastic Surgery in Early Breast Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Early Stage Breast Cancer
  • 933 Accesses

Abstract

Surgery for early breast cancer has evolved from the mutilating radical mastectomies to breast conservation surgery (BCS) aimed to reduce the disfigurement associated with surgery. In breast conservation surgery, where the surgeon has to excise >20% of the breast volume, the cosmetic outcomes are less than optimal. Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) combines techniques used in plastic surgery with the oncology principle of resecting the tumour with adequate margins and aims to reconstruct the breast defect taking into consideration both oncologic safety and preservation of breast form. In this chapter, a review of the rationale behind oncoplastic surgery, indications and techniques and the emerging clinical data on outcomes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, et al. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41(5):471–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mansfield L, Agrawal A, Cutress RI. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Gland Surg. 2013;2(3):158–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Audretsch W. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspect Plast Surg. 1998;11:71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Association of Breast Surgery at BASO, BAPRAS and the Training Interface Group in Breast Surgery/EJSO. Oncoplastic breast surgery–a guide to good practice. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:S1–S23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1375–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulstrode NW, Shortri S. Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast. 2001;10:124–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sickles, EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weber WP, Soysal SD, El-Tamer M, et al. First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165:139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iwuchukwu OC, Harvey JR, Dordea M, et al. The role of oncoplastic therapeutic mammoplasty in breast cancer surgery–a review. Surg Oncol. 2012;21(2):133–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Almasad JK, Salah B. Breast reconstruction by local flaps after conserving surgery for breast cancer: an added asset to oncoplastic techniques. Breast J. 2008;14:340–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamdi M, Rasheed MZ. Advances in autologous breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39(4):477–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Noguchi M, Taniya T, Miyazaki I, et al. Immediate transposition of a latissimus dorsi muscle for correcting a postquadrantectomy breast deformity in Japanese patients. Int Surg. 1990;75:166–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rainsbury RM. Breast-sparing reconstruction with latissimus dorsi miniflaps. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28(8):891–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD, Rasheed T. Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) flap for volume replacement in breast conserving surgery for medial breast tumours in small to medium sized breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(8):1056–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Losken A, Styblo TM, Carlson GW, et al. Management algorithm and outcome evaluation of partial mastectomy defects treated using reduction or mastopexy techniques. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:235–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM, Buchholz TA, et al. A management algorithm and practical oncoplastic surgical techniques for repairing partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1631–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda E, et al. Assessment of immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction: a classification system of defects revisited and an algorithm for selecting the appropriate technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:716–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McIntosh JM, O’Donoghue JM. Therapeutic mammoplasty–a systematic review of the evidence. EJSO. 2012;38:196–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, et al. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:145–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1507–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piper ML, Esserman LJ, Sbitany H, et al. Outcomes following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76 Suppl 3:S222–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clough KB, Gouveia PF, Benyahi D, et al. Positive margins after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitoussi AD, Berry MG, Famà F, et al. Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:454–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Clough KB, van la Parra RFD, Thygesen HH, et al. Longterm results after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):165–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haloua MH, Krekel NM, Winters HA, et al. A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):609–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3247–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: oncoplastic breast conserving reconstruction- indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4(11):657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yiannakopoulou EC, Mathelin C. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery and oncological outcome: systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(5):625–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Losken A, Hart AM, Broecker JS, et al. Oncoplastic breast reduction technique and outcomes: an evolution over 20 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:824–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mathew, A.P. (2021). Oncoplastic Surgery in Early Breast Cancer. In: Kunheri, B., Vijaykumar, D.K. (eds) Management of Early Stage Breast Cancer. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6171-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6171-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6170-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6171-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics