Abstract
Hands-on learning has been advocated by many educators to promote students’ motivation and provide concrete learning experience. The end-product of hands-on work is also treated as the main learning goal and adopted to gauge students’ performance. However, the industrial automation of robotics and advance of artificial intelligence cast doubt on such education rationale. This study, from the perspective of cognition, addressed the challenge of hands-on learning and summarized contemporary literatures to provide supports for teachers. Students’ high-level cognition ability and capability in grasping core concepts and the concepts themselves are claimed to be the undeniable value of learning, especially in higher education. This study hopes to contribute to teachers’ better understanding of hands-on learning and adopt such pedagogy accordingly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bruguier, L.R., Greathouse Amador, L.M.: New educational environments aimed at developing intercultural understanding while reinforcing the use of english in experience-based learning. Prof. Iss. Teach. Prof. Dev. 14(2), 195–211 (2012)
Hung, W.: Enhancing systems-thinking skills with modelling. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 39(6), 1099–1120 (2008)
Kariotoglou, P., Psillos, D.: Pupils pressure models and their implication for instruction. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 11(1), 95–108 (1993)
Andresen, L., Boud, D., Cohen, R.: Experience-based learning. In: Foley, G. (ed.) Understanding Adult Education and Training. Allen & Unwin, Sydney (1995)
Dewey, J.: Democracy and education. Teddington: Echo Library. (Original work published 1916) (2007)
Ord, J., Leather, M.: The substance beneath the labels of experiential learning: the importance of John Dewey for outdoor educators. J. Outdoor Environ. Educ. 15(2), 13 (2011)
Manches, A., O’Malley, C., Benford, S.: The role of physical representations in solving number problems: a comparison of young children’s use of physical and virtual materials. Comput. Educ. 54(3), 622–640 (2010)
Martin, T.: Physically distributed learning with virtual manipulatives for elementary mathematics. In: Robinson, D., Schraw, G. (eds.) Recent Innovations in Educational Technology That Facilitate Student Learning. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte (2007)
Greenaway, R.: A view into the future: the value of other ways of learning and development. In: Becker, P., Schirp, J. (eds.) Other Ways of Learning, pp. 347–367. bsj Marburg, Marburg (2008)
Mayer, R.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? the case for guided methods of instruction. Am. Psychol. 59, 14–19 (2004)
Kolb, D., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C.: Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. Perspect. Cogn. Learn. Think. Styles 1(8), 227–247 (2000)
Bujak, K.R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., Golubski, G.: A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Comput. Educ. 68, 536–544 (2013)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By, p. 256. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Glenberg, A.M., Brown, M.C., Levin, J.R.: Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 32(3), 389–399 (2007)
Magnusson, S., Palincsar, A.: Teaching to promote the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning about light at the elementary school level. In: Donovan, M.S., Bransford, J. (eds.) How Students Learn Science in the Classroom, pp. 421–474. National Academies Press, Washington (2005)
Osborne, R.: Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 1(1), 73–82 (1983)
Litts, B.K., Kafai, Y.B., Lui, D.A., Walker, J.T., Widman, S.A.: Stitching codeable circuits: high school students’ learning about circuitry and coding with electronic textiles. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 26, 1–14 (2017)
Yoon, S.A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., Tucker, S.: Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. Int. J. Comput. Supp. Coll. Learn. 7(4), 519–541 (2012)
Gavish, N., Gutierrez, T., Webel, S., Rodriguez, J., Tecchia, F.: Design guidelines for the development of virtual reality and augmented reality training systems for maintenance and assembly tasks. In: BIO Web of Conferences, vol. 1, p. 00029. EDP Sciences (2011)
Moreno, R., Ozogul, G., Reisslein, M.: Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: effects on students’ problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions. J. Educ. Psychol. 103(1), 32 (2011)
Sharp, J., Adams, B.: Children’s constructions of knowledge for fraction division after solving realistic problems. J. Educ. Res. 95, 333–347 (2002)
Goldstone, R.L., Sakamoto, Y.: The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cogn. Psychol. 46, 414–466 (2003)
Sloutsky, V.M., Kaminski, J.A., Heckler, A.F.: The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 508–513 (2005)
Johnson, A.M., Butcher, K.R., Ozogul, G., Reisslein, M.: Introductory circuit analysis learning from abstract and contextualized circuit representations: effects of diagram labels. IEEE Trans. Educ. 57(3), 160–168 (2014)
Bruner, J.: Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1966)
Wu, H.K., Lee, S.W.Y., Chang, H.Y., Liang, J.C.: Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput. Educ. 62, 41–49 (2013)
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., Stroupe, D.: Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Sci. Educ. 96(5), 878–903 (2012)
Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., Hennessey, M.: Sixth grade students’ epistemologies of science: the impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cogn. Instruction 18(3), 349–422 (2000)
Brown, A.L., Kane, M.J.: Preschool children can learn to transfer: learning to learn and learning from examples. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 493–523 (1988)
Ting, Y.L., Tai, Y.M.: Using technology in students’ daily life to teach science. Int. J. Technol. Eng. Educ. 9(1), 21–32 (2012)
Ting, Y.-L.: Using mainstream game to teach technology through an interest framework. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(2), 141–152 (2010)
Silverthorn, D.U., Thorn, P.M., Svinicki, M.D.: It’s difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the integrative themes in physiology curriculum module project. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 30(4), 204–214 (2006)
Kember, D.: Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university. High. Educ. 58(1), 1–13 (2009)
Singer, S., Smith, K.A.: Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. J. Eng. Educ. 102(4), 468–471 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ting, YL., Tai, Y. (2020). Tackling the Challenge of Hands-on Learning from Cognitive Perspective. In: Shen, J., Chang, YC., Su, YS., Ogata, H. (eds) Cognitive Cities. IC3 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1227. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6113-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6113-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6112-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6113-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)