Skip to main content

Effect of Geocells Geometry on the Performance of the Foundations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geocells
  • 412 Accesses

Abstract

In the present study, a series of tests has been carried out to develop an understanding of the influence of geocell reinforcement in improving performance of foundation beds under strip loading. It is observed that with the provision of geocell reinforcement, the bearing capacity of sand bed can be increased as high as 8 times compared to the unreinforced case. Improvement in bearing capacity increases with decrease in pocket size of geocells. The performance improvement is significant up to a geocell height of about 2 times the width of the footing. The optimum width of the geocell layer is around 4 times the footing width (B) at which stage, the geocell would intercept all the potential rupture planes formed in the foundation soil. To obtain maximum benefit, the top of geocell mattress should be at a depth of about 0.1B from the bottom of the footing. The findings of this study will be of use in efficient utilization of geocell reinforcement in increasing the performance of foundation beds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alford SJ, Webster SL (1978) Investigation of construction concepts for pavements across soft ground. Technical Report No. S-78-6, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Jarrett PM (1989) Large scale model tests of geocomposite mattresses over peat subgrades. Transp Res Rec 1188:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush DI, Jenner CG, Bassett RH (1990) The design and construction of geocell foundation mattress supporting embankments over soft ground. Geotext Geomembr 9:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield R (1999) Dimensional analysis for geotechnical engineers. Geotechnique, Lond, UK 49(3):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chummar AV (1972) Bearing capacity theory from experimental results. J Soil Mech Found Div, ASCE 98:1311–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowland JW, Wong SCK (1993) Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a geocell mattress foundation. Geotext Geomembr 12:687–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. Geotext Geomembr 43:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K, Madhavi Latha G (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over soft clay foundation. Geotech Test J, ASTM, 23:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan GWE, Fannin RJ, Farrar DM (1986) Model and full-scale tests of granular layers reinforced with a geogrid. In: Proceedings of third international conference on geotextiles, vol 1, pp 61–66 Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Kao TC, Kavazanjiam E Jr (1979) Analysis of grid cell reinforced pavement bases. Technical Report No. GL-79-8, U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR, Madhavi Latha G (1999) Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotext Geomembr 17:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea C, Mitchell JK (1978) Sand reinforcement using paper grid cells. ASCE Spring Convention and Exhibit, Preprint 3130, Pittsburgh, PA, 24–28 April

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig ET, McKee KE (1961) Static and dynamic behaviour of small footings. J Soil Mech Found Div, ASCE 87:29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Simac MR (1990) Connections for geogrid systems. Geotext Geomembr 9:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York, p 118

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webster SL, Watkins JE (1977) Investigation of construction techniques for tactical bridge approach roads across soft ground. Technical Report No. S-77-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, February

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit Kumar Dash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dash, S.K. (2020). Effect of Geocells Geometry on the Performance of the Foundations. In: Sitharam, T., Hegde, A., Kolathayar, S. (eds) Geocells. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6095-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6095-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6094-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6095-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics