Skip to main content

Comparison of Slope Stability Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Finite Element Method, and Limit Equilibrium Method

  • 734 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE,volume 85)

Abstract

The principles of slope stability analysis embrace the mechanics of slope failure to develop methods of stability analysis, to predict factors of safety and corresponding slope movements. By equating the disturbing and resisting forces on potential slip surfaces, limit equilibrium method computes the corresponding factor of safety. These static stability methods can be used to calculate the minimum factor of safety, but they cannot predict pre- and post-failure movements of the system in case of failure. As an advanced numerical method, finite element method and the strength reduction technique take into consideration the stress distribution within the slope. This stress distribution controls the deformations, movements, and development of failure zones for a given slope. Along with the factor of safety, FEM also predicts these expected deformations/movements. These deformations in FEM are dependent heavily on the meshing of the whole system and suffer from mesh distortion and low accuracy in case of run-out/flow analysis where mesh deformations are relatively more significant. Run-out/flow failures (landslides, landfill failures), where the debris flows over a great distance, have been a prominent research topic for many years. Numerical methods have been developed such as the center of the mass method, FEM with updated mesh techniques, DAN/W, and meshless methods (SPH, DEM, and DDM). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a meshless technique which discretizes continuous material into discrete particles. When combined with yield strength, SPH solves Navier–Stokes equations to predict the slip surfaces as well as run-out/flow of the slope. In this study, a comparison has been made between LEM, FEM, and SPH on slope failures taken from literature. The slip surfaces as obtained from these slope failures have been compared, and the deformations have been studied between FEM and SPH. The advantage of SPH in predicting flow failures has been highlighted.

Keywords

  • Slope stability
  • Flow failures
  • Smoothed particle hydrodynamics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6086-6_24
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-981-15-6086-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Géotechnique 5(1):7–17

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blight G (2008) Slope failures in municipal solid waste dumps and landfills: a review. Waste Manage Res 26:448–463

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Qiu T (2012) Numerical simulations for large deformation of granular materials using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. Int J Geomech 12(April):127–135

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YM, Lansivaara T, Wei WB (2007) Two-dimensional slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium and strength reduction methods. Comput Geotech 34(3):137–150

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo AJC, Domínguez JM, Rogers BD, Gómez-Gesteira M, Longshaw S, Canelas R, Vacondio R, Barreiro A, García-Feal O (2015) DualSPHysics: open-source parallel CFD solver based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Phys Commun 187:204–216

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson EM, Roth WH, Drescher A (1999) Slope stability analysis by strength reduction. Géotechnique 49(6):835–840

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM (2013) Slope Stability Then and Now. In: Proceedings of the 2013 geo-congress: stability and performance of slopes and embankments III, pp 2191–2210

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM (1996) State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. J Geotech Eng 122(7):577–596

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gao W (2016) Determination of the noncircular critical slip surface in slope stability analysis by meeting ant colony optimization. J Comput Civil Eng 30(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics-theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices Roy Astronom Soc 181:375–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JP, Monaghan JJ, Swift RP (2001) SPH elastic dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(49–50):6641–6662

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greco VR (1996) Efficient monte carlo technique for locating critical slip surface. J Geotech Eng 122(7):517–525

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV, Lane PA (1999) Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique 49(3):387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Dai Z, Zhang W (2014a) Geo-disaster modeling and analysis: an SPH-based approach. In: Geo-disaster modeling and analysis: an SPH-based approach

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Dai Z, Zhang W (2014b) SPH modeling for flow behavior of liquefied soils. In: Geo-disaster modeling and analysis: an SPH-based approach, pp 1–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Dai Z, Zhang W, Huang M (2013) SPH-based numerical simulations of flow slides in municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Manage Res 31(3):256–264

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MB, Liu GR (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): An overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(1):25–76

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui T, San K-C (1992) Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique. Soils Found 32(1):59–70

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Merry SM, Kavazanjian E, Fritz WU (2005) Reconnaisance of the July 10 2000, Payatas landfill failure. ASCE J Perform Constr Facil 19:100–107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110(2):399–406

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nonoyama H, Moriguchi S, Sawada K, Yashima A (2015) Slope stability analysis using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. Soils Found 55(2):458–470

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rushbrook P, Pugh M (1999) Solid waste landfills in Middle- and Lower-income countries. A technical guide to planning, design, and operation. World Bank Tech Paper 426:1–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces. Géotechnique 17(1):11–26

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tschebotarioff GP (1973) Foundations, retaining and earth structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DY, Lee CF, Jiang HD (2003) Generalised framework of limit equilibrium methods for slope stability analysis. Geotechnique 53(4):377–395

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Humpheson C, Lewis RW (1977) Discussion: Associated and non-associated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics. Géotechnique 27(1):101–102

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandeep Singh Basson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Basson, M.S., Venkataraman, R., Ramana, G.V. (2020). Comparison of Slope Stability Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Finite Element Method, and Limit Equilibrium Method. In: Latha Gali, M., P., R.R. (eds) Geotechnical Characterization and Modelling. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 85. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6086-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6086-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6085-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6086-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)