Skip to main content

Iran’s International Relations in the Face of Imperial Interpolarity: The “Look to the East” Policy and Multifaceted Impact of Sanctions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Iran in an Emerging New World Order

Part of the book series: Studies in Iranian Politics ((STIRPO))

Abstract

After having examined Iran’s international relations in the period from “9/11” to the initial phase of the Iraq War (–2004), this chapter deals with the ensuing period until Iran’s new president Rouhani takes office in 2013. On the one hand, by the mid-2000s, Iran emerged as the region’s indispensable power—as a combined result of the U.S. occupation “quagmires” in Iraq and Afghanistan, and of Iran’s successful regional policies relying on Offensive Realist prescripts—boosted by the political successes of its regional allies and the spike in oil prices leading to record revenues. At a time when Iranian hardliners had assumed supremacy domestically, the IRI turned out to be the victor of the U.S. neo-conservatives’ “regime change” operations. On the other, the “nuclear crisis” that emerged in 2002 put Iran increasingly at odds with Western powers, keeping the threat of war alive and subjected it to unprecedented international sanctions from the mid-2000s onwards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Parsi 2012b.

  2. 2.

    See Saghafi-Ameri 2006b: 3–4.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.: 3.

  4. 4.

    Ibid.: 3.

  5. 5.

    See Mousavian 2008.

  6. 6.

    See Mousavian 2012b: 267–271.

  7. 7.

    Fischer 2007: 39.

  8. 8.

    Saghafi-Ameri and Ahadi 2008.

  9. 9.

    Kronauer 2005; Massarrat 2006b.

  10. 10.

    Reissner 2005.

  11. 11.

    Djalili and Kellner 2005: 5.

  12. 12.

    However, as Rezakhani (2010: 420) holds, ‘the concept of a continuous, purpose-driven [silk] road or even “routes” […] has no basis in historical reality or records.’

  13. 13.

    See, for example, Saghafi-Ameri and Ahadi 2008.

  14. 14.

    Sariolghalam 2012: 73–74.

  15. 15.

    Quah 2010, 2011.

  16. 16.

    See Zakaria 2008.

  17. 17.

    Author’s interview with Hafeznia.

  18. 18.

    Ehteshami 2007: 82.

  19. 19.

    Ibid.: 82–93.

  20. 20.

    Ehteshami 2007: 95.

  21. 21.

    Own calculation based on BP 2006: 20.

  22. 22.

    Milani 2009: 54.

  23. 23.

    Saghafi-Ameri and Ahadi 2008. See also Morady 2011b.

  24. 24.

    Akbarzadeh 2015.

  25. 25.

    Ehteshami 2007: 93.

  26. 26.

    Saghafi-Ameri and Ahadi 2008.

  27. 27.

    Azami et al. 2012.

  28. 28.

    Grevi 2009; see also Grevi and Gnesotto 2006.

  29. 29.

    Vanaik 2013: 195.

  30. 30.

    See Massarrat 2006a; Josifidis and Lošonc 2014.

  31. 31.

    Johnson 2005.

  32. 32.

    Ahmad 2003: 46.

  33. 33.

    See Waltz 2000.

  34. 34.

    See Massarrat 2003; Abdolvand and Schulz 2003.

  35. 35.

    Chomsky 2009.

  36. 36.

    Leech and Leech 2009.

  37. 37.

    Ahmad 2003: 46; Vanaik 2013.

  38. 38.

    Massarrat 2014.

  39. 39.

    Author’s interview with Kuhn.

  40. 40.

    Massarrat 2014.

  41. 41.

    See, for example, Ahmad 2003: 45–46.

  42. 42.

    Waltz 2000: 14.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.: 15.

  44. 44.

    Ibid.: 15–17.

  45. 45.

    Ibid.: 18.

  46. 46.

    Ibid.: 14.

  47. 47.

    Grevi 2009: 24.

  48. 48.

    Barkawi and Laffey (2002: 109) use the term “imperial hierarchy”.

  49. 49.

    See Vanaik 2012, 2013.

  50. 50.

    Achcar 2000: 133. See also Joffe 1995; Achcar 1999.

  51. 51.

    See Sauer 2007; Fathollah-Nejad 2010.

  52. 52.

    Cited in FNS 2012.

  53. 53.

    See The Daily Star 2012.

  54. 54.

    See also Namâyandeh 2014.

  55. 55.

    See, for example, Kozhanov 2012a, b; Shafaie 2012.

  56. 56.

    Cited in Shafaie 2012 (Pt. 1).

  57. 57.

    See Mousavian 2012b: 91–93.

  58. 58.

    Cited in Ribet 2013.

  59. 59.

    Author’s interview with Kuhn.

  60. 60.

    Mousavian 2012b: 93.

  61. 61.

    Kuhn 2013. See also Downs and Maloney 2011.

  62. 62.

    Xinhua 2010a; Ghafouri 2009.

  63. 63.

    By the mid-2000s, the world’s leading consumers of primary energy were (in %): the U.S. (22.2), China (14.7), the Russian Federation (6.4), Japan (5.0), India (3.7), Germany (3.1), France (2.5), the United Kingdom (2.2) and South Korea (2.1) (BP 2006: 40).

  64. 64.

    Fair 2007: 44.

  65. 65.

    See Shahid 2007; Chaudhary 2001.

  66. 66.

    Purushothaman 2012: 906–907.

  67. 67.

    Fair 2007: 44.

  68. 68.

    See Klare 2008: 205.

  69. 69.

    Noteworthy in this regard was the February 2007 Iran visit by India’s Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee amidst heightened U.S.−Iranian discord. See Sreenivasan 2007.

  70. 70.

    Fair 2007: 41.

  71. 71.

    Varadarajan 2005, 2007; Koshy 2005. While President Bush signed the U.S.−Indian civilian nuclear deal into law on 18 December 2006, the U.S. Congress unsuccessfully tried to require India to halt its fissile material production and/or end its military relations with Iran as preconditions for nuclear cooperation.

  72. 72.

    Cited in Varadarajan 2007.

  73. 73.

    Bansal 2012; Dadwal 2012; Dietl 2012; Goswami 2013; Hussain 2012; Kumaraswamy 2012; Mishra 2012; Samuel and Rajiv 2012; Ramana 2012; Singh Roy and Lele 2010; Singh Roy 2012; Kronstadt and Katzman 2006.

  74. 74.

    Purushothaman 2012.

  75. 75.

    See Fathollah-Nejad 2010: 54–59.

  76. 76.

    See, for example, Hürriyet Daily News 2010; Santos Vieira de Jesus 2011.

  77. 77.

    See AFP 2010; AJE 2010; Bueno 2010a, b; CASMII 2010; Dequan 2010; Dyer and Gorst 2010; Escobar 2010a, b; Friedman 2010; Hürriyet 2010; MacAskill 2010; Poor 2010; Porter 2010; Santiago 2010; The Japan Times 2010; Watanabe 2011.

  78. 78.

    Kozhanov 2012a: 16.

  79. 79.

    Ibid.: 16–17. See also Tazmini 2010.

  80. 80.

    Kozhanov 2012a: 8.

  81. 81.

    Sonboli 2009: pt. 1.

  82. 82.

    Sonboli 2009: pt. 2.

  83. 83.

    Torbat 2005: 426 [Table 3].

  84. 84.

    See Kozhanov 2013.

  85. 85.

    See Kuhn 2013: 323ff.

  86. 86.

    Pape 1998; see also Pape 1997.

  87. 87.

    International Crisis Group 2013.

  88. 88.

    Ibid.: 15–19.

  89. 89.

    Ibid.: 17.

  90. 90.

    See also Lucas 2013.

  91. 91.

    Khamenei 2013a.

  92. 92.

    Hakimian 2012.

  93. 93.

    See Borger 2012.

  94. 94.

    See Porter 2012a.

  95. 95.

    Hadian and Hormozi 2011: 48.

  96. 96.

    Hadian and Hormozi 2011.

  97. 97.

    See e.g. Richter, Paul (2012) ‘U.S. signals major shift on Iran nuclear program’, Los Angeles Times, 27 April.

  98. 98.

    See also interview with Oman researcher Cinzia Bianco, October 2014.

  99. 99.

    Arshad Mohammad & Parisa Hafezi (2013) ‘U.S., Iran held secret talks on march to nuclear deal’, Associated Press, 24 November.

  100. 100.

    See Bozorgmehr 2013.

  101. 101.

    For an exposition of such a view, see Torfeh 2010.

  102. 102.

    VOA 2012.

  103. 103.

    Council of the European Union 2012: 2.

  104. 104.

    See Daragahi and Mostaghim 2010.

  105. 105.

    Abdolvand and Schulz 2010.

  106. 106.

    Xinhua 2010b.

  107. 107.

    See Keck 2013.

  108. 108.

    Bozorgmehr and Dyer 2010.

  109. 109.

    Klebnikov 2003.

  110. 110.

    Lakshmanan and Pratish Narayanan 2012.

  111. 111.

    Salehi-Isfahani 2009b.

  112. 112.

    For Iraq, see Gordon 2010.

  113. 113.

    Sonboli interviewed by Miriam Shabafrouz, 1 June 2012, Berlin; cited in Shabafrouz 2014: 257.

  114. 114.

    See, for example, Salehi-Isfahani 2009b, 2012; Mehrabi 2012; Kamali Dehghan 2012.

  115. 115.

    Cited in Kamali Dehghan 2012.

  116. 116.

    See Al-Ali 2003, 2005, 2011.

  117. 117.

    See Tahmasebi 2012.

  118. 118.

    ICAN 2012: 5.

  119. 119.

    Ibid.

  120. 120.

    ICAN 2012: 7. See also Khanlarzadeh 2009; ICHRI 2011.

  121. 121.

    Salehi-Isfahani 2010.

  122. 122.

    Author’s conversations with several Iranian student activists (all wishing to remain anonymous), London, 2008–2013.

  123. 123.

    See Iran Labor Report 2011; ICAN 2012: 5.

  124. 124.

    See Iran Labor Report 2012.

  125. 125.

    See Malm and Esmailian 2007.

  126. 126.

    See USLAW 2012.

  127. 127.

    Ottolenghi 2010: 25.

  128. 128.

    Ibid.: 21, emphasis added.

  129. 129.

    Ibid.: 26.

  130. 130.

    Licht 2011.

  131. 131.

    Peksen and Drury 2009.

  132. 132.

    Peksen 2009.

  133. 133.

    Peksen 2010.

  134. 134.

    Also see Morgen and Bapat 2009; Parsi and Bahrami 2012.

  135. 135.

    ICHRI 2013: 129–141.

Bibliography

A

  • Abdolvand, Behrooz & Schulz, Heinrich (2003) ‘Verteidigung des Dollars mit anderen Mitteln’ [Defending the dollar by other means], Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, No. 2, pp. 181–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdolvand, Behrooz & Schulz, Heinrich (2010) ‘Elitenkampf um Ressourcen: Der Allokationskrieg im Iran’ [Élite struggle for resources: The war of allocation in Iran], WeltTrends, Vol. 18, No. 70 (January–February), pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achcar, Gilbert (1999) La nouvelle Guerre froide: Le monde après le Kosovo [The new Cold War: The world after the Kosovo], Paris: Presses universitaires de France (PUF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Achcar, Gilbert (2000) ‘The Strategic Triad: USA, China, Russia’, in: Ali, Tariq (ed.) Masters of the Universe? NATO’s Balkan Crusade, London: Verso, pp. 99–144. [First published as ‘The Strategic Triad: The United States, Russia and China’, New Left Review, No. I/208 (March/April 1998), pp. 91–126.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Agence France–Press [AFP] (2010) ‘Turkish PM says West unfair, insincere in Iran row: report’, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghaei, Kamran Scot & Marashi, Afshin (eds.) (2014) Rethinking Iranian Nationalism and Modernity, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Aijaz (2003) ‘Imperialism of Our Time’, in: Panitch, Leo & Leys, Colin (eds.) Socialist Register 2004: The New Imperial Challenge, Vol. 40, pp. 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbarzadeh, Shahram (2015) ‘Iran and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Ideology and Realpolitik in Iranian Foreign Policy’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ali, Nadje (2003) ‘Women, Gender Relations, and Sanctions in Iraq’, in: Shams, Inati (ed.) Iraq: Its History, People, and Politics, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, pp. 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ali, Nadje (2005) ‘Gendering Reconstruction: Iraqi Women Between Dictatorship, Wars, Sanctions and Occupation’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 26, Nos. 4–5, pp. 7–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ali, Nadje (2011) ‘A Feminist Perspectives on the Iraq War’, Works and Days, Vol. 29, Nos. 1–2, pp. 99–114. Al-Azmeh, Aziz (2002) ‘Postmodern Obscurantism and the »Muslim Question«’, in: Panitch, Leo & Leys, Colin (eds.) Socialist Register 2003: Fighting Identities, London: Merlin Press, pp. 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Jazeera English (2010) ‘Brazil slams US approach towards Iran’, 20 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azami, Hadi & Zarghani, Seyyed Hadi & Dabiri, Ali Akbar (2012) ‘The Impact of Regional Preferences and Geopolitical Views on Forming Regional Organisations (the Case Study of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation)’ (in Persian), Pezhohesh Nâmeh-ye Irâni-e Siâsat-e Beyn-ol-mellal (Iranian Research Letter of International Politics), Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn–Winter) pp. 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

B

  • Bansal, Alok (2012) ‘Iran: Its Strategic Importance’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 848–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkawi, Tarak & Laffey, Mark (2002) ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borger, Julian (2012) ‘EU agrees Iran oil embargo’, The Guardian, 4 January; ‘SWIFT instructed to disconnect sanctioned Iranian banks following EU Council decision’, SWIFT.com, La Hulpe (Belgium): SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication), 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgmehr, Najmeh (2013) ‘Rohani’s Landslide Victory Spreads Hope of Moderate Policies’, Financial Times, 15 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgmehr, Najmeh & Dyer, Geoff (2010) ‘China overtakes EU as Iran’s top trade partner’, Financial Times, 8 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Petroleum [BP] (2006) Statistical Review of World Energy 2006, June.

    Google Scholar 

C

  • Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Interventions in Iran [CASMII] (2010) ‘Obama’s letter to Lula exposes US dishonesty with Iran’, CASMII Press Release, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, Shamila N. (2001) ‘Iran to India Natural Gas Pipeline: Implications for Conflict Resolution & Regionalism in India, Iran, and Pakistan’, TED Case Study, Vol. 11, No. 1 (January), Washington, DC: American University, School of International Service, Trade Enviroment Database (TED).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (2009) ‘Crises and the Unipolar Moment’, talk delivered in the »Globalization Lecture Series«, convened by Prof. Gilbert Achcar, Department of Development Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, London, Institute of Education, 27 October.

    Google Scholar 

D

  • Dadwal, Shebonti Ray (2012) ‘India–Iran Energy Ties: A Balancing Act’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 930–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daragahi, Borzou & Mostaghim, Ramin (2010) ‘Iran Hard–Liners Skirt Sanctions’, Los Angelos Times, 23 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dequan, Zhai (2010) ‘Iran deserves a break’, China Daily, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietl, Gulshan (2012) ‘India’s Iran Policy in the Post-Cold War Period’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 871-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djalili, Mohammad-Reza & Kellner, Thierry (2005) Iran – Regard vers l’Est: La politique asiatique de la République islamique, Brussels: Groupe de recherche et d’information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Erica & Maloney, Suzanne (2011) ‘Getting China to Sanction Iran: The Chinese–Iranian Oil Connection’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 2 (March), pp. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Geoff & Gorst, Isabel (2010) ‘Iran tests Russia–China diplomacy’, Financial Times, 19 May.

    Google Scholar 

E

  • Ehteshami, Anoushiravan (2007) Globalization and Geopolitics in the Middle East: Old Games, New Rules, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, Pepe (2010a) ‘Iran, Sun Tzu and the Dominatrix’, Asia Times Online, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, Pepe (2010b) ‘Iran: Obama’s Other Oil Spill’, Asia Times Online, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

F

  • Fair, C. Christine (2007) ‘Indo-Iranian Ties: Thicker than Oil’, The Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA), Vol. 11. No. 1 (March), pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathollah-Nejad, Ali (2010) Der Iran-Konflikt und die Obama-Regierung: Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen? [The Iran conflict and the Obama administration: Old wine in new skins?], Potsdam (Germany): Potsdam University Press (WeltTrends-Papiere, No. 12), reprinted in 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal News Service [FDS] (2012) Transcript of the third debate between President Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney, 22 October 2012 in Boca Raton, FL, moderated by Bob Schieffer of CBS, http://www.npr.org/2012/10/22/163436694/transcript-3rd-obama-romney-presidential-debate.

  • Fischer, Joschka (2007) ‘Iran: High Stakes’, Dissent, Vol. 54, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Thomas L. (2010) ‘As Ugly as It Gets’, New York Times, 26 May, p. A27 (New York edn.).

    Google Scholar 

G

  • Ghafouri, Mahmoud (2009) ‘China’s Policy in the Persian Gulf’, Middle East Policy, Vol. 16, No. 2 (summer), pp. 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Joy (2010) Invisible War: The United States and the Iraq Sanctions, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, Namrata (2013) ‘India’s strategic culture is plain to see’, Asia Times Online, 8 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevi, Giovanni (2009) ‘The Interpolar World: A New Scenario’, Occasional Paper, No. 79 (June), Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevi, Giovanni & Gnesotto, Nicole (2006) (eds.) The New Global Puzzle: What World for the EU in 2025? October, Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

H

  • Hadian, Nasser & Hormozi, Shani (2011) ‘Iran’s New Security Environment Imperatives: Counter Containment or Engagement with the US’, Iran Review of Foreign Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Winter), pp. 13–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimian, Hassan (2012) ‘Iran’s Economy Is Hurting – Yet Sanctions Are Not a Nuclear Deterrent’, The Guardian (online), 3 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürriyet (2010) ‘US, Russia and France dismiss Brazil–Turkey–brokered Iran deal’, 9 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, Mushtaq (2012) ‘Indo-Iranian Relations during the Cold War’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 859-870.

    Google Scholar 

I

  • International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran [ICHRI] (2011) Raising Their Voices: Iranian Civil Society Reflections on the Military Option, New York: ICHRI, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran [ICHRI] (2013) The Growing Crisis: The Impact of Sanctions and Regime Policies on Iranians’ Economic and Social Rights, New York: ICHRI, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Civil Society Action Network [ICAN] (2012) Killing them Softly: The Stark Impact of Sanctions on the Lives of Ordinary Iranians, Washington: ICAN (What the Women Say Brief, No. 3, July).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Crisis Group (2013) Spider Web: The Making and Unmaking of Iran Sanctions, Brussels: International Crisis Group (Middle East Report, No. 138, February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iran Labor Report (2011) ‘Radio Interview’, translation of Deutsche Welle interview with Jafar Azimzadeh (Free Union of Iranian Workers), 30 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2012) ‘The New Year Begins with Fresh Layoffs, Protests’, 15 April.

    Google Scholar 

J

  • Joffe, Josef (1995) ‘»Bismarck« or »Britain«? Towards an American Grand Strategy After Bipolarity’, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Spring), pp. 94–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers (2005) The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josifidis, Kosta & Lošonc, Alpar (2014) ‘Some Thoughts on Power: International Context’, Panoeconomicus, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 597–615.

    Google Scholar 

K

  • Kamali Dehghan, Saeed (2012) ‘Sanctions on Iran: ‘Ordinary People Are the Target”, The Guardian, 10 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Zachary (2013) ‘China’s Trade and Investment in Iran Plummets’, The Diplomat, 22 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajehpour, Bijan. Marashi, Reza & Parsi, Trita (2013) »Never Give In and Never Give Up«: The Impact of Sanctions on Tehran’s Nuclear Calculations, Washington, DC: National Iranian American Council (NIAC), March. [For a critical review, see Lucas, Scott (2013) ‘Iran Special: Sanctions, »Analysis«, and the Never-Ending Circle of Propaganda – From NIAC to the Neo-Cons’, EA WorldView, 29 March.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamenei, Ali (2013a) ‘Supreme Leader’s Speech to People of Qom’, Khamenei.ir, 9 January 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanlarzadeh, Mina (2009) ‘Iranian Women and Economic Sanctions: The Threat of War and Economic Sanctions Contribute to a Patriarchal Culture’, Z Magazine, Vol. 22, No. 2 (February), pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, Michael T. (2008) Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy, New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebnikov, Paul (2003) ‘Millionaire Mullahs’, Forbes.com , 21 July.

  • Koshy, Ninan (2005) ‘India and the Iran Vote in the IAEA’, Silver City, NM & Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), 27 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhanov, Nikolay A. (2012a) Russia’s Relations with Iran: Dialogue Without Commitments, Washington, DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy (Policy Focus, No. 120, June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhanov, Nikolay A. (2012b) ‘Russian–Iranian Economic Relations: Opportunities and Challenges’, The Maghreb Review: A Quarterly Journal on the Maghreb, the Middle East, Africa and Islamic Studies, Vol. 37, Nos. 3–4 (December), pp. 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhanov, Nikolay A. (2013) ‘Unilateral Economic Sanctions Against Iran: Unexpected Implications’, Fair Observer, Pt. 1 (14 May) & Pt. 2 (21 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronauer, Jörg (2005) ‘Kampf um die Anbindung Irans an den Westen’ [The fight over tying Iran to the West], Telepolis, 10 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronstadt, K. Alan & Katzman, Kenneth (2006) ‘India–Iran Relations and U.S. Interests’, CRS Report RS22486, Washingtoin, DC: Congressional Research Service (CRS), 2 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Maximilian (2013) Enabling the Iranian Gas Export Option: The Destiny of Iranian Energy Relations in a Tripolar Struggle over Energy Security and Geopolitics, Wiesbaden (Germany): VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, P. R. (2012) ‘Israel: The Non-Parallel Player’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 976–986.

    Google Scholar 

L

  • Lakshamanan, Indira A.R. & Narayanan, Pratish (2012) ‘Indian and China Skirt Iran Sanctions with »Junk for Oil«’, Bloomberg, 30 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, Dennis & Leech, Robert (2009) Reforming IMF and World Bank Governance: In Search of Simplicity, Transparency and Democratic Legitimacy in the Voting Rules, Department of Economics, University of Warwick, UK (The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series [TWERPS], No. 914).

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, Amanda A. (2011) ‘Falling Out of Favor: Economic Sanctions and the Tenure of Leaders’, paper presented at the 2011 Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 31 March–3 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Scott (2013) ‘Iran Special: Sanctions, »Analysis«, and the Never-Ending Circle of Propaganda – From NIAC to the Neo-Cons’, EA WorldView, 29 March.

    Google Scholar 

M

  • MacAskill, Ewen (2010) ‘Iran faces fresh sanctions as Russia and China support UN resolution’, The Guardian, 18 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, Abbas (2009) ‘The New Democrat: An Intellectual History of the Green Wave’, The New Republic, 15 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, Mohsen M. (1994) The Making of Iran’s Islamic Revolution: From Monarchy to Islamic Republic, 2nd edn., Boulder, CO & London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani (2006) ‘Iran’s Policy Towards Afghanistan’, The Middle East Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2 (April), pp. 235–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani (2009) ‘Tehran’s Take: Understanding Iran’s U.S. Policy’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 4 (July/August), pp. 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malm, Andreas & Esmailian, Shora (2007) Iran on the Brink: Rising Workers and Threats of War, London & Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarrat, Mohssen (2003) Amerikas Weltordnung: Hegemonie und Kriege um Öl [America’s world order: Hegemony and wars for oil], Hamburg (Germany): VSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarrat, Mohssen (2006a) Kapitalismus – Machtungleichheit – Nachhaltigkeit: Perspektiven Revolutionärer Reformen [Capitalism – power disparity – sustainability: Perspectives for revolutionary reforms], Hamburg: VSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarrat, Mohssen (2006b) ‘Der Iran und Europas Versagen’ [Iran and Europe’s failure], Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, No. 5 (May), pp. 544–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarrat, Mohssen (2014) ‘Chaos und Hegemonie: Wie der US-Dollar-Imperialismus die Welt dominiert’ [Chaos and hegemony: How U.S. dollar imperialism dominates the world], Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, No. 5/2014 (May), pp. 93–100; ‘Impérialisme-e nafti va mahvariat-e dollar’, Ettelaat (Tehran), published in four parts on 4, 5, 6 and 7 Âbân 1392 / 26, 27, 28 and 29 October 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, Ehsan (2012) ‘Report from Tehran: How Sanctions Hurt the Lives of Ordinary Iranians’, InsideIRAN, 26 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, Atul (2012) ‘Necessary Oppositions: Domestic Debates on Iran’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 882-898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morady, Farhang (2011b) ‘Iran Ambitious for Regional Supremacy: The Great Powers, Geopolitics and Energy Resources’, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, Vol. 7, No. 1 (June), pp. 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgen, T. Clifton & Bapat, Navin A. (2009) ‘Multilateral Versus Unilateral Sanctions Reconsidered: A Test Using New Data’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 4 (December), pp. 1075–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavian, Hossein (2008) Iran–Europe Relations: Challenges and Opportunities, London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavian, Hossein (2012b) The Iranian Nuclear Crisis: A Memoir, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

N

  • Namâyandeh, Navid (2014/1393) ‘Jahângir Karami, Expert on Russian Affairs: The Russians are Pursuing their Own Interests’ (in Persian), Irân-e Fardâ, No. 6 (6 November / 15 Âbân), pp. 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

O

  • Ottolenghi, Emanuele [director, Transatlantic Institute, Brussels] (2010) ‘Setting the Sanctions Agenda: The West Has a Wide Range of Options with Which to Squeeze Tehran’, The Journal of International Security Affairs, Washington, DC: The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, No. 18 (Spring), pp. 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

P

  • Pape, Robert A. (1997) ‘Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work’, International Security, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Fall), pp. 90–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, Robert A. (1998) ‘Why Economic Sanctions Still Do Not Work’, International Security, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Summer), pp. 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsi, Trita (2012b) A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsi, Trita & Bahrami, Natasha (2012) ‘Blunt Instrument: Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change’, Boston Review (online), 6 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peksen, Dursun (2009) ‘Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 46, No. 1 (January), pp. 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peksen, Dursun (2010) Coercive Diplomacy and Press Freedom: An Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Economic Sanctions on Media Openness’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (September), pp. 449–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peksen, Dursun & Drury, A. Cooper (2009) ‘Economic Sanctions and Political Repression: Assesing the Impact of Coercive Diplomacy on Political Freedoms’, Human Rights Review, Vol. 10, No. 3 (September), pp. 393–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poor, Jeff (2010) ‘Krauthammer: »People are talking about American decline – don’t believe a word of it«’, The Daily Caller, 24 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Gareth (2010) ‘Fuel Swap Shakes Sanctions Draft, Prods U.S. on New Iran Talks’, Inter-Press Service, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Gareth (2012a) ‘Understanding Iran’s Diplomatic Strategy: Iran Has Been Developing Nuclear Capacities in Order to Obtain Leverage in Diplomatic Talks with the United States’, Al Jazeera, 27 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purushothaman, Uma (2012) ‘American Shadow over India-Iran Relations’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 899-910.

    Google Scholar 

Q

  • Quah, Danny (2011) ‘The Global Economy’s Shifting Centre of Gravity’, Global Policy, Vol. 2, No. 1 (January), pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, Danny (2010) ‘The Shifting Distribution of Global Economic Activity’, working paper, Economics Department, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), May.

    Google Scholar 

R

  • Ramana, Siddharth (2012) ‘The Pakistan Factor in the India–Iran Relationship’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November), pp. 941–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissner, Johannes (2005) Irans neue Distanz zum Westen: Die Präsidentschaftswahlen als Ausdruck grundsätzlicher Kräfteverschiebungen [Iran’s new distance towards the West: The presidential elections as relection of fundamental shifts of power], Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs of the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) (SWP-Aktuell, No. 32, July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezakhani, Khodadad (2010) ‘The Road That Never Was: The Silk Road and Trans-Eurasian Exchange’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 420–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribet, Steven (2013) ‘Chinese Analysts Give Positive Nod to Iran’s New Pres.’, Press TV, 8 August.

    Google Scholar 

S

  • Saghafi-Ameri, Nasser (2006b) Iran and »Look to the East« Policy, Tehran: Center for Strategic Research, Department of Foreign Policy Research / Strategic Studies Group, Research Bulletin No. 5 (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghafi-Ameri, Nasser & Ahadi, Afsaneh (2008) Iran va Siâsat-e Negâh beh Sharq (Iran and the »Look to the East« Policy), Tehran: Center for Strategic Research Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad (2009b) ‘Iran Sanctions: Who Really Wins?’, Brookings Institutions, Washington, D.C., 30 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad (2010) ‘Iran’s Youth, The Unintended Victims of Sanctions’, Dubai Initiative – Policy Brief, Cambridge, MA: The Dubai Initiative, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad (2012) ‘Iran and Sanctions: When will it ever end?’, The Economist, 18 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, S & Rajiv, C. (2012) ‘In Pursuit of a Chimera: Nuclear Imbroglio between Sanctions and Engagement’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 911–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, Felipe (2010) ‘Spain defends Brazil–Iran–Turkey agreement’, The Epoch Times, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos Vieira de Jesus, Diego (2011) ‘Building Trust and Flexibillity: A Brazilian View of the Fuel Swap with Iran’, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2 (March), pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sariolghalam, Mahmood (Mahmoud) [Professor of International Relations, Shahid Beheshti University (formerly National University of Iran), Tehran] (2012/1391) ‘Negâh-e Irâni be Diplomatie-e Jahâni’ [Iranian viewpoint on global diplomacy], interviewed by Mojtabâ Fathi & Mehrâveh Khârazni, Shargh, 6 June / 17 Khordâd, pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Tom (2007) Coercive Diplomacy by the EU: The Case of Iran, The Hague: Netherlands Institue of International Relations Clingendael (Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, No. 106, January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabafrouz, Miriam (2014) ‘»Like a ton of bricks« – Die Sanktionen als Hürde auf Irans Weg zur Wirtschaftsmacht’ [»Like a ton of bricks« – The sanctions as hurdle on Iran’s pathway to an economic power], in: Bock, Andreas & Henneberg, Ingo (eds.) Iran – ewiger Feind oder potenzieller Partner [Iran – eternal enemy or potential partner?], Baden-Baden (Germany): Nomos, pp. 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafaie, Shirin (2012) ‘After Moscow: Will There Be War or Peace?’, Interview with Nikolay Kozhanov, Fair Observer, Pt. 1 (14 June) and Pt. 2 (15 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahid, Soheib (2007) ‘Iran–Pak–India gas pipeline: Implications and prospects’, Buisness & Finance Review (Karachi), 15 January, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh Roy, Meena & Lele, Ajey (2010) ‘Engaging Iran in the New Strategic Enviroment: Opportunities and Challenges for India’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh Roy, Meena (2012) ‘Iran: India’s Gateway to Central Asia’, Strategic Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 6 (November–December), pp. 957–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonboli, Nabi [IPIS] (2009/1389) ‘Châlesh-hâye zohour-e Irân beh onvân-e qodrat-e manteqe’i’ [Challenges to Iran’s emergence as regional power], Jomhouri-ye Eslâmi, Part 1 (24 Mordâd / 2 August) & Part 2 (26 Mordâd / 4 August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, T.P. [former Indian governor to the IAEA] (2007) ‘Pranab’s Iran visit a signal to the US’, Rediff, 12 February.

    Google Scholar 

T

  • Tahmasebi, Sussan (2012) ‘Short Narratives About the Impact of Sanctions on Ordinary Iranians – Part 1 – Courtesy of Sussan Tahmasebi’, posted by the Facebook group »No to Sanctions or War Against Iran«, 23 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazmini, Ghoncheh (2010) ‘Russian–Iranian Relations in the Context of the Tehran Declaration’, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Daily Star (2012) ‘U.S. Group: Lebanese Banks Laundering Money’, 5 July, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Japan Times (2010) ‘Iran’s Mottaki to meet Okada’, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbat, Akbar E. (2005) ‘Impacts of US Trade and Financial Sanctions on Iran’, The World Economy, Vol. 28, No. 3 (March), pp. 407–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfeh, Massoumeh (2010) ‘Sanctions against Iran May Boost the Protest Movement’, The Guardian, 11 June.

    Google Scholar 

U

  • U.S. Labor Against War [USLAW] (2012) ‘USLAW Calls for More Diplomacy, Not the Military in Dealing with Iran’, Steering Committee, Washington, DC, 12 March.

    Google Scholar 

V

  • Vaez, Ali (2013) ‘Iran Sanctions: Which Way Out?’, Iran Primer, Washington, DC: United States Institue for Peace, 5 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanaik, Achin (2012) ‘Hegemonic Stability? The New Quintet and Other Powers’, paper presented at the 5th Foreign Policy Conference of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in cooperation with the foreign policy journal WeltTrends, »Hegemony and Multipolarity: World Orders in the 21st Century«, University of Potsdam (Germany), 11–12 October, 11 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanaik, Achin (2013) ‘Capitalist Globalisation and the Problem of Stability: Enter the New Quintet and Other Emerging Powers’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 194–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, Siddharth (2005) ‘The unravelling of India’s Persian puzzle’, The Hindu, 27 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, Siddharth (2007) ‘India’s anti-Iran votes were coerced, says former U.S. official’, The Hindu, 16 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voice of America [VOA] (2012) ‘Obama: Iran facing »unprecedented, crippling sanctions«’, 6 March.

    Google Scholar 

W

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (2000) ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Summer), pp. 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Tsuneo (2011) ‘Lessons in Diplomacy from the Iran Sanctions’, The Tokyo Foundation, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

X

  • Xinhua News Agency [Xinhua] (2010a) ‘Saudi Arabia, Angola, Iran remain top 3 oil suppliers to China’, 10 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua News Agency [Xinhua] (2010b) ‘Iran National Economic Day will be held on 10th June in Shanghai’, translated from Chinese, 22 May, available via http://en.iran-chinachamber.ir/.

Z

  • Zakaria, Fareed (2008) ‘The Rise of the Rest’, Newsweek, 12 May, pp. 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

Official Documents (Excerpts)

  • Council of the European Union (2012) ‘Council Conclusion on Iran’, press release, 3142th Foreign Affairs Council meeting, Brussels, 23 January.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Fathollah-Nejad .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fathollah-Nejad, A. (2021). Iran’s International Relations in the Face of Imperial Interpolarity: The “Look to the East” Policy and Multifaceted Impact of Sanctions. In: Iran in an Emerging New World Order. Studies in Iranian Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6074-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics