Skip to main content

Predicting Profitability of Peer-to-Peer Loans with Recovery Models for Censored Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision Technologies (IDT 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 193))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 482 Accesses

Abstract

Peer-to-peer lending is a new lending approach gaining in popularity. These loans can offer high interest rates, but they are also exposed to credit risk. In fact, high default rates and low recovery rates are the norms. Potential investors want to know the expected profit in these loans, which means they need to model both defaults and recoveries. However, real-world data sets are censored in the sense that they have many ongoing loans, where future payments are unknown. This makes predicting the exact profit in recent loans particularly difficult. In this paper, we present a model that works for censored loans based on monthly default and recovery rates. We use the Bondora data set, which has a large amount of censored and defaulted loans. We show that loan characteristics predicting lower defaults and higher recoveries are usually, but not always, similar. Our predictions have some correlation with the platform’s model, but they are substantially different. Using a more accurate model, it is possible to select loans that are expected to be more profitable. Our model is unbiased, with a relatively low prediction error. Experiments in selecting portfolios of loans with lower or higher Loss Given Default (LGD) demonstrate that our model is useful, whereas predictions based on the platform’s model or credit ratings are not better than random.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.bondora.com/en/public-reports.

References

  1. Wang, Z., Jiang, C., Ding, Y., Lyu, X. And Liu, Y.: A novel behavioral scoring model for estimating probability of default over time in peer-to-peer lending. Electron. Commer. Res. App. 27, 74–82 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klafft, M.: Online peer-to-peer lending: a lenders’ perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on ELearning, E-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and EGovernment, pp. 371–375. EEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutierrez-Nieto, B., López-Palacios, L.: Determinants of default in P2P lending. PLoS One 10(10), e0139427 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emekter, R., Tu, Y., Jirasakuldech, B., Lu, M.: Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending. Appl. Econ. 47(1), 54–70 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, X., Li, X., Zheng, Z.: Evaluating borrower’s default risk in peer-to-peer lending: evidence from a lending platform in China. Appl. Econ. 49(35), 3538–3545 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malekipirbazari, M., Aksakalli, V.: Risk assessment in social lending via random forests. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(10), 4621–4631 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Byanjankar, A., Heikkilä, M., Mezei, J.: Predicting credit risk levels in peer-to-peer lending: a neural network approach. In: IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI, pp. 719–725. Cape Town (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xia, Y., Liu, C., Liu, N.: Cost-sensitive boosted tree for loan evaluation in peer-to-peer lending. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 24, 30–49 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Đurović, A.: Estimating probability of default on peer to peer market-survival analysis approach. J. Central Banking Theor. Pract. 6(2), 149–167 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutiérrez-Nieto, B.: The use of profit scoring as an alternative to credit scoring systems in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. Decis. Support Syst. 89, 113122 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Byanjankar, A., Viljanen, M.: Predicting expected profit in ongoing peer-to-peer loans with survival analysis-based profit scoring. In: Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 142. Springer, Singapore (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mild, A., Waitz, M., Wöckl, J.: How long can you go?—Overcoming the inability of lenders to set proper interest rates on unsecured peer-to-peer lending markets. J. Bus. Res. 68(6), 1291–1305 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou, G., Zhang, Y., Luo, S.: P2P network lending, loss given default and credit risks. Sustainability 10(4) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Papoušková, M., Hajek, P.: Modelling loss given default in peer-to-peer lending using random forests.InL Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 142. Springer, Singapore (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Viljanen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Viljanen, M., Byanjankar, A., Pahikkala, T. (2020). Predicting Profitability of Peer-to-Peer Loans with Recovery Models for Censored Data. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. IDT 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 193. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5925-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics