Skip to main content

Deniz: A Robust Bidding Strategy for Negotiation Support Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Automated Negotiations (ACAN 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 905))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents the Deniz agent that has been specifically designed to support human negotiators in their bidding. The design of Deniz is done with the criteria of robustness and the availability of small data, due to a small number of negotiation rounds in mind. Deniz’s bidding strategy is based on an existing optimal concession strategy that concedes in relation to the expected duration of the negotiation. This accounts for the small data and small number of rounds. Deniz deploys an adaptive behavior-based mechanism to make it robust against exploitation. We tested Deniz against typical bidding strategies and against human negotiators. Our evaluation shows that Deniz is robust against exploitation and gains statistically significant higher utilities than human test subjects, even though it is not designed specifically to get the highest utility against humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Deniz is a gender-independent name, i.e., it is used for both females and males, and means “sea.”

  2. 2.

    Note that in the first round, move is undefined.

  3. 3.

    Note that \(\small {\text {silent}}\) moves are thus considered here to be cooperative moves.

  4. 4.

    If negotiator n started the negotiation, then in every round i, n is the first to bid, and \(o_n\) is the last. So, when in round i, and referring to the last bid made the opponent, it can well be that that bid was made during the previous round.

References

  1. R. Aydoğan, T. Baarslag, C.M. Jonker, K. Fujita, T. Ito, R. Hadfi, K. Hayakawa, A baseline for non-linear bilateral negotiations: the full results of the agents competing in anac 2014, (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Azaria, Z. Rabinovich, S. Kraus, C.V. Goldman, Y. Gal, Strategic advice provision in repeated human-agent interactions. Inst. Adv. Comput. Stud. Univ. Maryl. 1500(20742) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Baarslag, E.H. Gerding, R. Aydoğan, M.C. Schraefel, Optimal negotiation decision functions in time-sensitive domains, in 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), vol. 2 (2015), pp. 190–197

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Baarslag, K.V. Hindriks, C.M. Jonker, Effective acceptance conditions in real-time automated negotiation. Dec. Support Syst. 60, 68–77 (2014). Apr

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Broekens, M. Harbers, W.-P. Brinkman, C.M. Jonker, K. Van den Bosch, J.-J. Meyer, Virtual reality negotiation training increases negotiation knowledge and skill, in International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (Springer, 2012), pp. 218–230

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. DeVault, J. Mell, J. Gratch, Toward natural turn-taking in a virtual human negotiation agent, in 2015 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Fisher, W.L. Ury, B. Patton, Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin, Getting to yes (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Fujita, R. Aydoğan, T. Baarslag, K. Hindriks, T. Ito, C. Jonker, The sixth automated negotiating agents competition (anac 2015), in Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation (Springer, 2017), pp. 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Fujita, R. Aydoğan, T. Baarslag, T. Ito, C. Jonker, The fifth automated negotiating agents competition (anac 2014), in Recent Advances in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation (Springer, 2016), pp. 211–224

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Gratch,D.DeVault,G. Lucas, The benefits of virtual humans for teaching negotiation, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA), September 2016 (Springer, Los Angeles, CA, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Hindriks, C.M. Jonker, D. Tykhonov, Let’s dans! an analytic framework of negotiation dynamics and strategies. Web Intel. Agent Syst. Int. J. 9(4), 319–335 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Richardson Howard Raiffa, D. Metcalfe, Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. C.M. Jonker, R. Aydoğan, T. Baarslag, J. Broekens, C.A. Detweiler, K.V. Hindriks, A. Huldtgren, W. Pasman, An introduction to the pocket negotiator: a general purpose negotiation support system, in Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies (Springer, 2016), pp. 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.M. Jonker, R. Aydoğan, T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, T. Ito, K.V. Hindriks, Automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC). AAAI, 5070–5072 (2017

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.J. Lewicki, D.M. Saunders, B. Barry, John W. Minton, Essentials of Negotiation (McGraw- Hill, Boston, MA, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Lin, S. Kraus, Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Commun. ACM 53(1), 78–88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Lin, Y. Oshrat, S. Kraus, Automated agents that proficiently negotiate with people: can we keep people out of the evaluation loop, in New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations (Springer, 2012), pp. 57–80

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Mell, J. Gratch, T. Baarslag, R. Aydoğan, C.M. Jonker, Results of the first annual human-agent league of the automated negotiating agents competition, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (ACM, 2018), pp. 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Pommeranz, W. Visser, J. Broekens, P. Wiggers, K. Hindriks, C.M. Jonker, Duo meta-model for knowledge elicitation and bidding support in nss, in Proceedings of 11th Group Decision and Negotiation Conference (2010), pp. 120–123

    Google Scholar 

  20. Howard Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation: How to Resolve Conflicts and Get the Best Out of Bargaining (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Thompson, The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, 3rd edn. (Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants that over the years helped us in our experiments. We also give specific thanks to scientific programmer Wouter Pasman, technician Bart Vastenhouw, Dimitrios Teskouras, professor of the course at Erasmus University that hosted part of our experiments, and our collaborator in many negotiation research projects Tim Baarslag.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catholijn M. Jonker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jonker, C.M., Aydoğan, R. (2021). Deniz: A Robust Bidding Strategy for Negotiation Support Systems. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Aydoğan, R. (eds) Advances in Automated Negotiations. ACAN 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 905. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5869-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics