Advertisement

Importance of Process Flow and Logic Criteria for RPA Implementation

Conference paper
  • 214 Downloads
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 186)

Abstract

Robotic process automation (RPA) is a promising technology within the area of management of business processes. Firms are adopting RPA to digitalize and transform processes with the goal of increase of productivity and efficiency, cost reduction, and service improvement. As such it is crucial to identify processes and activities suitable for RPA. Research in this paper is focused on process flow and logic criteria which is neglected in the RPA literature. It is based on the analysis of real-life event log and its common pattern composed of tasks, which is found in the process using process mining techniques with Apromore tool and modeled using Bizagi modeler. The BPMN model is used for simulation of 3 scenarios with the common pattern. We found out that process flow and logic is important criteria to consider while implementing RPA solution. More specifically, in the case of fixed resources, it is necessary to first automate the task with the worst cycle time based on the productivity and efficiency of the common pattern. In the case of the pool of resources, the automation of the common pattern using RPA is less restrictive regarding cycle times of particular tasks due to its reallocation possibilities allowing for higher flexibility of gradual automation.

Keywords

RPA Process mining Process enhancement Process analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by Project SGS/8/2018 project “Advanced methods and procedures of business process management” implemented by the Silesian University in Opava, Czechia.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Bichler, M., Heinzl, A.: Robotic process automation. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60, 269–272 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smart, P.A., Maddern, H., Maull, R.S.: Understanding business process management: implications for theory and practice. Br. J. Manage. 20, 491–507 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00594.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madakam, S., Holmukhe, R.M., Jaiswal, D.K.: The future digital work force: robotic process automation (RPA). JISTEM—J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manage. 16 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-1775201916001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zeng, J., Khan, Z.: Value creation through big data in emerging economies. Manage. Decis. 57, 1818–1838 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2018-0572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., Bygstad, B.: Organizing robotic process automation: balancing loose and tight coupling. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/60128/0688.pdf. Last accessed 22 Dec 2019
  6. 6.
    Lamberton, C.: Get ready for robots. Why planning makes the difference between success and disappointment. https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_-_Get_ready_for_robots/$FILE/EY-get-ready-for-robots-2016-DK.pdf. Last accessed 29 Dec 2019
  7. 7.
    Lacity, M., Willcocks, L.: Robotic process automation at Telefonica O2. MIS Q. Exec. 15 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lacity, M., Wollcocks, L.: Robotic process automation: the next transformation lever for shared services. http://www.umsl.edu/~lacitym/OUWP1601.pdf. Last accessed 22 Dec 2019
  9. 9.
    Baranauskas, G.: Changing patterns in process management and improvement: using rpa and rda in non- manufacturing organizations. Eur. Sci. J. ESJ. 14, 251 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Asatiani, A., Penttinen, E.: Turning robotic process automation into commercial success—case OpusCapita. J. Inf. Technol. Teach. Cases 6, 67–74 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1057/jittc.2016.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aguirre, S., Rodriguez, A.: Automation of a business process using robotic process automation (RPA): a case study. In: Figueroa-García, J.C., López-Santana, E.R., Villa-Ramírez, J.L., and Ferro-Escobar, R. (eds.) Applied computer sciences in engineering. pp. 65–71. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slaby, J.: Robotic automation emerges as a threat to traditional low-cost outsorcing, https://www.blueprism.com/resources/white-papers/robotic-automation-emerges-as-a-threat-to-traditional-low-cost-outsourcing/. Last accessed 22 Dec 2019
  13. 13.
    Fung, H.P.: Criteria, use cases and effects of information technology process automation (ITPA). Adv. Robot. Autom. 03, 1–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutherland, Framing a constitution for robotistan: racing with the machine of robotic automation. https://neoops.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/RS_1310-Framing-a-constitution-for-Robotistan.pdf. Last accessed 1 Jan 2019
  15. 15.
    van der Aalst, W.: Process mining: data science in action. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van den Broucke, S.K.L.M., De Weerdt, J.: Fodina: a robust and flexible heuristic process discovery technique. Decis. Support Syst. 100, 109–118 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business Administration in KarvinaSilesian University in OpavaKarvináCzechia

Personalised recommendations