Skip to main content

Public Goods, Externalities and the City

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
City Form, Economics and Culture

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Architectural Design and Technology ((BRIEFSARCHIDE))

  • 621 Accesses

Abstract

We explain the concept of public goods as understood in economics. That is, non-rivalrous and non-excludable goods as opposed to rivalrous and excludable private goods. We also explain the concept of externality as the effect on society as a whole. We show how markets cannot effectively provide neither public goods nor goods that involve externalities. We argue that cities, as a tangle of public goods and externalities, need effective governance and thus regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, the legal system as a whole is a public good. Without a legal system the enforcement of property rights would be impossible. The mere existence of markets therefore relies on a public good that must be provided by the government. This fact is as essential as overlooked.

  2. 2.

    For instance, an unregulated, perfectly competitive fishing industry would result in depletion of the fish stocks, see Nicholson and Snyder (2015).

  3. 3.

    Note that something can be a good for some and a bad for others. Fireworks are a good example.

  4. 4.

    Euclidian zoning, Fluck (1986), will be explained in detail in Chap. 8.

  5. 5.

    Some economic thinking suggests that the cost of market failure due to public goods, externalities etc. is actually lower than the cost of government failure. That is the cost imposed on society in terms of taxes, lobbying, corruption and so on. Notwithstanding government ought to be less than perfect, we deeply disagree with this line of thought.

References

  • Fluck, T. A. (1986). Euclid v. Ambler: A retrospective. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(3), 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, W., & Snyder, C. M. (2015). Intermediate microeconomics and its application, twelfth edition. Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Guillen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guillen, P., Komac, U. (2020). Public Goods, Externalities and the City. In: City Form, Economics and Culture. SpringerBriefs in Architectural Design and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5741-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5741-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5739-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5741-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics