Skip to main content

A Conceptual Model for Smart Manufacturing Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing

Abstract

Current manufacturing systems are incorporating digital extensions to meet the emerging trend of ‘smart’ manufacturing techniques. The underlying distinction of Smart Manufacturing Systems (SMS) is the digital network of several elements (machines, tools, auxiliary equipments, building services and people) that constitute these. The purpose of such a network is to enhance information transfer among these elements, as well as bolster the performance and efficiency of the roles that these elements are so entitled to. Such a network relies on the data collected from these elements; currently, both academicians and practitioners are delving into efficient ways to collect the data thus required. Although a plethora of models have been proposed for manufacturing systems, they seem to offer poor advice in regard to data collection from an overall system perspective. It is still not understood as to which elements should be focused and what are the efficient methods to collect data from these. To shed light on these gaps, we propose, herein, a new model for manufacturing systems, as illustrated by an orthotic shoe factory example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davis, J. (2017). Smart Manufacturing. Encyclopedia Sustainable Technology pp. 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asthon, K. (2010). That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing. RFID Journal 4986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett., 3, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. Impact Control Technology, 12(1), 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smart Manufacturing Leadership Coalition (SMLC). (2011). Implementing 21st Century Smart Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. FoF. (2013). Impact of the factories of the future public-private partnership final report on the workshop held on.

    Google Scholar 

  9. April, W. G. (2013). “Final_report__Industrie_4.0_RecomForImplementation,” no. April.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: An outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(1), 3159805.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siddharth, L., & Sarkar, P. (2018). A multiple-domain matrix support to capture rationale for engineering design changes. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 18(2), 021014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., & Wang, B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 39, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40(Icc), 536–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dov, D., & Hillary, S. (2017). What is a system? An ontological framework. Systems Engineering, 20(3), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suh, N. P., Cochran, D. S., & Lima, P. C. (1998). Manufacturing system design. CIRP Annual Manufacturing Technology, 47(2), 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, R. Y., Storey, V. C., & Firth, C. P. (1995). A framework for analysis of data quality research. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7(4), 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain, S., Triantis, K. P., & Liu, S. (2011). Manufacturing performance measurement and target setting: A data envelopment analysis approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(3), 616–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kusiak, A. (2006). Data mining: Manufacturing and service applications. International Journal of Production Research, 44(18–19), 4175–4191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hutchison, D. & Mitchell, J.C. (2003). Data warehousing and knowledge discovery vol. 2737.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leong, S., Lee, Y. T., & Riddick, F. (2006, September). A core manufacturing simulation data information model for manufacturing applications. In Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Simulation Interoperability and Standards Organization (pp. 1–7).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barkmeyer, E. (1997). SIMA reference architecture part I: Activity models, NISTIR 5939. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eder, W. E. (2015). Theory of technical systems. July 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schenk, M., Wirth, S., & Müller, E. (2009). Factory planning manual situation-driven production facility planning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hesselbach, J. (2012). “Energie- und klimaeffiziente Produktion,” Energie- und klimaeffiziente Produktion.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hesselbach, J., Herrmann, C., Detzer, R., Martin, L., Thiede, S., & Ludemann, B. (2008). Energy efficiency through optimised coordination of production and technical building services. In LCE 2008: 15th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering: Conference Proceedings (p. 624). CIRP.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Herrmann, C., & Thiede, S. (2009). Process chain simulation to foster energy efficiency in manufacturing. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(4), 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Steward, D. V. (1981). The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-28(3), 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Siddharth, L., Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2017). Modelling and structuring the knowledge of failures using design structure matrix (DSM) for reuse during product life-cycle. In 6th International Conference on Product Lifecycle Modeling, Simulation and Synthesis—PLMSS 2017, DIAT, Pune, India, 2017 (pp. 104–115).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Groover, M. P. (2002). Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing. Pearson Education India.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DIN 8580. (2003). Manufacturing processes—terms and definitions.

    Google Scholar 

  31. CO2PE! (Cooperative Effort on Process Emissions in Manufacturing) (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kota, S., & Chakrabarti, A. (2010). A method for Estimating the Degree of Uncertainty With Respect to Life Cycle Assessment During Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bayou, M. E., & Nachtman, J. B. (1992). Costing for manufacturing wastes. Journal of Cost Management (Summer): 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ashby, M. F., & Ash, M. F. (2011). Materials selection mechanical design in second edition Oxford Auckland Boston Johannesburg Melbourne New Delhi in Second Edition (pp. 32–65).

    Google Scholar 

  35. U. Nations. (2008). International Standard Classification of All Economics Activity Isic.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Siddharth, L., Chakrabarti, A., Venkataraman, S. (2018). Representing complex analogues using a function model to support conceptual design, no. August, p. V01BT02A039.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dieter, G. E., Schmidt, L. C., & Azarm, S. (2009). Engineering design.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Issues, C. (2005). Stochastic modeling of manufacturing systems.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Huang, C. C., & Kusiak, A. (1998). Manufacturing control with a push-pull approach. International Journal of Production Research, 36(1), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishaan Kaushal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kaushal, I., Siddharth, L., Chakrabarti, A. (2021). A Conceptual Model for Smart Manufacturing Systems. In: Chakrabarti, A., Arora, M. (eds) Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5689-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5689-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5688-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5689-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics