Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implications and Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Teachers at Work

  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

This study sheds light on the complexity of the enactment of curriculum materials in higher education in China. The findings revealed that at the mesoinstitutional level, the adoption and dissemination of innovative curriculum materials are only the first steps for the educational change; at the micro classroom level, materials use manifested in a series of interactive actions. The whole enactment process was by no means linear but dynamic, situated and complex, which must be deliberatively scrutinized by all parties in the educational system to ensure the success of the curriculum reform. In this chapter, the significance of the study will be elucidated to show the extent to which the study has been successful. After that, both the practical and theoretical implications of the study will be illustrated. In the end, I will acknowledge the limitations of this research and make recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is or might be the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. & Li, W. (2019). Individual agency and changing language education policy in China: Reactions to the new ‘Guidelines on College English Teaching’. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363–401). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2014). Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 654–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K. (2019). Recent books on language materials development and analysis. ELT Journal, 73(3), 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrettaz, A. M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2017). What can we learn from mainstream education textbook research? RELC Journal, 48(2), 264–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, S. (2014). Factors influencing Japanese teachers’ adoption of communication-oriented textbooks. In K. Garton & S. Graves (Eds.), International Perspectives on Materials in ELT (pp. 253–269). England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C. M., & Keller, J. D. (1996). Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). It’s about time. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 665–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. (2020). Disentangling teachers' enactment of materials: A case study of two language teachers in higher education in China. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. J. (2017). An examination of language teachers’ enactment of curriculum materials in the context of a centralized curriculum. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(3), 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. (2018). Understanding language teachers’ enactment of content through the use of curriculum materials. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, V., & Griffiths, B. (2012). Textbook mediation of teaching: An example from tertiary mathematics instructors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, R. O. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C. (1996). Teachers’ maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawer, S., Gilmore, D., & Banks-Joseph, S. (2009). Learner-driven EFL curriculum development at the classroom level. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. W. (2013). Replacing the ‘teacher-proof’ curriculum with the ‘curriculum-proof’ teacher: Toward more effective interactions with mathematics textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(02), 143–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2018, June). Teacher development through materials development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Materials Development Association, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. B. M. (2012). The dialectics of theory and practice in teacher knowledge development. In J. Huttner, B. Mehlmauer-Larcher, S. Reichl, & B. Schiftner (Eds.), Theory and practice in EFL teacher education: Bridging the gap (pp. 16–37). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China

    Zhan Li

Authors
  1. Zhan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhan Li .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, Z. (2020). Implications and Conclusion. In: Language Teachers at Work. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5515-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5515-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5514-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5515-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation