Skip to main content

How to Model the Influence of In-vehicle Crowding on Travel Behavior: A Comparison Among Moderation, Independent Variable and Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Transportation Systems 2020

Abstract

Accurate modeling of travel choice behavior is crucial for effective transport demand forecasting, management and planning. This study tries to shed light on the appropriate modeling approach concerning the influences of in-vehicle crowding on mode choice behavior in the multimodal network. Stated preference surveys covering four commuting transport modes and four influencing factors are conducted to collect empirical behavior data. Three modeling methods, treating the in-vehicle crowding as a moderator of perceived travel time, as an independent variable and by incorporating interaction effect, are empirically compared. The result indicates that there is a bidirectional interaction between travel time and in-vehicle crowding. The influence of in-vehicle crowding increases with increasing travel time and vice versa. Considering crowding as an independent variable and taking the effects of travel time on the perception of in-vehicle crowding are the best ways to depict the overall influences of in-vehicle crowding. The sensitivity analysis shows that increasing the cost of using car is comparatively effective for reducing car usage. Shortening the travel time of public transit and improving service quality such as travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding are more useful in attracting car users as compared to reduction in the cost of public transit. The results provide insights into travelers’ behavior in the multimodal network and could support scientific transport management and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SURCTDRI, Transportation operation annual report of Shanghai (Year of 2017). 2018, Shanghai Uban and Rural Construction and Transportation Development Research Institue (SURCTDRI): Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, C., et al.: Potential risk and its influencing factors for separated bicycle paths. Accid. Anal. Prev. 87, 59–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaudoin, J., Farzin, Y.H., Lawell, C.-Y.C.L.: Public transit investment and sustainable transportation: a review of studies of transit’s impact on traffic congestion and air quality. Res. Trans. Econ. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gao, K., et al.: Perceptions of mode-specific travel time reliability and crowding in multimodal trip. Trans. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, pp. 1–22 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, H., Gao, K., Tu, H.: Variations in mode-specific valuations of travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding: implications for demand estimation. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 103, 250–263 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pel, A.J., Bel, N.H., Pieters, M.: Including passengers’ response to crowding in the dutch national train passenger assignment model. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 66, 111–126 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Redman, L., et al.: Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp. Policy 25, 119–127 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qu, X., Meng, Q.: The economic importance of the straits of malacca and Singapore: an extreme-scenario analysis. Transp. Res. Part E Logistics Transp. Rev. 48(1), 258–265 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Litman, T.: Valuing transit service quality improvement. J. Public Transp. 11, 43–63 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M.: Crowding in public transport systems: effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 53, 36–52 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Batarce, M., et al.: Valuing crowding in public transport systems using mixed stated/revealed preferences data: the case of Santiago. In: TRB 94th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Washington DC (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, K., Shao, M., Sun, L.: Roles of psychological resistance to change factors and heterogeneity in car stickiness and transit loyalty in mode shift behavior: a hybrid choice approach. Sustainability 11(17), 4813 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, S., Zhang, W., Qu, X.: Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations. Transp. Res. Part B Methodological 118, 318–335 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, S., Qu, X.: Station choice for Australian commuter rail lines: equilibrium and optimal fare design. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258(1), 144–154 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Bie, Y., et al.: Dynamic headway control for high-frequency bus line based on speed guidance and intersection signal adjustment. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 35(1), 4–25 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Crowding and public transport: a review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal. Transp. Policy 18(6), 880–887 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whelan, G.A. Crockett, J.: An investigation of the willingness to pay to reduce rail overcrowding. In: International Conference on Choice Modelling. Harrogate, England, Apr (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tirachini, A., et al.: Valuation of sitting and standing in metro trains using revealed preferences. Transp. Policy 47, 94–104 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vovsha, P., et al. Statistical Analysis of Transit User Preferences Including In-vehicle Crowding and Service Reliability. In: www.trb.org Compendium of papers TRB 93rd Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shao, M., Li, T., Sun, L.: Survey method and model of passengers’ cost perception of crowding level in bus. J. Tongji Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 07, 1031–1034 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsch, L., Thompson, K.: I can sit but I’d rather stand: commuter’s experience of crowdedness and fellow passenger behaviour in carriages on Australian metropolitan trains. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wardman, M., Murphy, P.: Passengers’ valuations of train seating layout, position and occupancy. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 74, 222–238 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao, K., et al.: Heterogeneity in valuation of travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding for mode choices in multimodal networks. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 144(10), 04018061 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Crowding in public transport: a review of objective and subjective measures. J. Public Transp. 16(2), 6 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuang, Y., Qu, X., Wang, S.: A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. Accid. Anal. Prev. 77, 137–148 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qu, X., et al.: Potential crash risks of expressway on-ramps and off-ramps: a case study in Beijing. China. Safety science 70, 58–62 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Gao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gao, K., Fan, J., Zeng, Z. (2020). How to Model the Influence of In-vehicle Crowding on Travel Behavior: A Comparison Among Moderation, Independent Variable and Interaction. In: Qu, X., Zhen, L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Smart Transportation Systems 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 185. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5270-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5270-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5269-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5270-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics