Skip to main content

Improving Validity of Disaster Related Information by Identifying Correlation Among Different Social Media Streams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Technologies and Applications (INTAP 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1198))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 896 Accesses

Abstract

Social media has become an important mode for communication and content sharing in this digital world. During large-scale events, a big cluster of data usually posted by the users on social media; in the form of tweets, pictures and videos. The data is informative, but not all the contents which are posted on the social media have reliable information. The existence of spam, fake images and manipulation can reduce the validity of information on social media. To establish trust in information posted on social media, there is a need to identify a mechanism that can recognize and report questionable posts and flag them for scrutiny and verification. This research will provide an approach in assessing and improving the validity of information on social media. The users will able to identify the validity of information along with polarity and subjectivity of tweets and videos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acar, A., Muraki, Y.: Twitter for crisis communication: lessons learned from Japan’s tsunami disaster. Int. J. Web Based Communities 7(3), 392–402 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boididou, C., Papadopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, Y., Schifferes, S., Newman, N.: Challenges of computational verification in social multimedia. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 743–748. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 675–684. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheong, F., Cheong, C.: Social media data mining: a social network analysis of tweets during the 2010-2011 Australian floods. PACIS 11, 46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duan, Y., Jiang, L., Qin, T., Zhou, M., Shum, H.-Y.: An empirical study on learning to rank of tweets. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 295–303. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P., Castillo, C., Meier, P.: TweetCred: real-time credibility assessment of content on Twitter. In: Aiello, L., McFarland, D. (eds.) SocInfo 2014. LNCS, vol. 8851, pp. 228–243. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Imran, M., Elbassuoni, S., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., Meier, P.: Practical extraction of disaster-relevant information from social media. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1021–1024. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joachims, T.: Training linear SVMS in linear time. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 217–226. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, B., O’Donovan, J., Höllerer, T.: Modeling topic specific credibility on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 179–188. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, J., Castillo, C., Lalmas, M., Zucker-man, E.: Finding news curators in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 863–870. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, M.R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., Schwarz, J.: Tweeting is believing? Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 441–450. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quercia, D., Askham, H., Crowcroft, J.: TweetLDA: supervised topic classification and link prediction in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 247–250. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, F., Liu, Y., Yu, X., Yang, M.: Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Mining Data Semantics, p. 13. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, J., Counts, S., Morris, M.R., Hoff, A.: Microblog credibility perceptions: comparing the USA and China. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 575–586. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bakhtiar Kasi , Riaz Ul-Amin or Abdul Sattar Malik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arshad, M.F., Kasi, B., Ul-Amin, R., Malik, A.S. (2020). Improving Validity of Disaster Related Information by Identifying Correlation Among Different Social Media Streams. In: Bajwa, I., Sibalija, T., Jawawi, D. (eds) Intelligent Technologies and Applications. INTAP 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1198. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5232-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5232-8_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5231-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5232-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics