Abstract
Research is a systematic inquiry into phenomena to understand the phenomena and/or to solve problems related to the phenomena. Though tentative and not always correct, research knowledge can provide different perspectives of practices in school and balance the use of practitioner knowledge in classroom teaching, which is also not always correct. Several studies have indicated that teachers may not be able to find research that is relevant and practical for their immediate needs, and even if the relevant research reports can be found, teachers may have difficulty in reading, understanding and acting on them; the studies suggest that intermediaries work with teachers to address these issues. This chapter proposes guidelines to help intermediaries identify relevant studies that can help teachers address their areas of concern, interpret these studies, present them, explain how the findings and suggestions from the studies can be implemented in their classrooms and work with them in the implementation. The guidelines were developed based on a case study in which an intermediary (the author) facilitated the use of educational research by three chemistry teachers in their practice by supporting the teachers in the development of research-informed instructional material and strategies to address their students’ difficulties in planning chemistry experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abbott, M., Walton, C., & Tapia, Y. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65(3), 339–352.
Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with published research: Addressing the knowledge problem. The Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 488–509.
Cartrette, D. P., & Bodner, G. M. (2010). Non-mathematical problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 643–660.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11, 38–46.
Cordingley, P. (2008). Research and evidence-informed practice: Focusing on practice and practitioners. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 37–52.
Edwards, A., Sebba, J., & Rickinson, M. (2007). Working with users: Some implications for educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 647–661.
Flick, L. B. (2000). Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 109–129.
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655–675.
Herrington, D., & Daubenmire, P. L. (2016). No teacher is an island: Bridging the gap between teachers’ professional practice and research findings. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(8), 1371–1376.
Hill, H. C. (2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 289–318.
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.
Kessels, J. P. A. M., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 17–22.
Levin, B. (2011). Mobilising research knowledge in education. London Review of Education, 9(1), 15–26.
Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2–31.
Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education. (2018). Integrated programmes (IP). Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/other/integrated-programme.
Nakhleh, M. B., Polles, J., & Malina, E. (2002). Learning chemistry in a laboratory environment. In O. De Jong. J. K. Gilbert, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 69–94). Dordrecht: Springer.
Nelson, S. R., Leffler, J. C., & Hansen, B. A. (2009). Toward a research agenda for understanding and improving the use of research evidence. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(11), 331–337.
Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., et al. (2004). Evidence-based practice in science education (EPSE) research report: Science education practitioners’ views of research and its influence on their practice. York: University of York.
Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (2006). From evidence to impact: Users’ perception of research and its influence on their practices. In R. Millar, J. Leach, J. Osborne., & M. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Improving subject teaching: Lessons from research in science education (pp. 134–151). London: Routledge.
Ryder, J. (2015). Being professional: accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 87–120.
See, B. H., Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2016). Teachers’ use of research evidence in practice: A pilot study of feedback to enhance learning. Educational Research, 58(1), 56–72.
Tan, K. C. D., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Chemistry teaching: Impact of research on practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 207–218.
Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D. & Frost, S. (2004). Improving the use of research in social care. Knowledge review 7. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence/Policy Press.
Acknowledgments
The work reported in this paper was supported by a research grant (RS 2/14 TKC) from the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tan, K.C.D. (2020). Facilitating the Use of Research in Practice: Teaching Students to Plan Experiments. In: Teo, T.W., Tan, AL., Ong, Y.S. (eds) Science Education in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5154-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5155-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)