Skip to main content

Meta-Analysis of Weighted Mean Difference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Meta-Analysis

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

Mean difference can be used as an effect size measure if the outcome variable has the same unit of measurement for both the treatment/intervention and placebo/control groups. The raw mean difference can be scaled by the inverse variance weight to define weighted mean difference (WMD). Unlike the SMD, the WMD retains the same unit of measurement as the outcome variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1(2):97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1973) Experiments for nonlinear functions (R.A. Fisher Memorial Lecture). J Am Stat Assoc 68(344):771−781. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1973.10481423

  • DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, Thalib L, Williams GM (2015a) Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: the inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp Clin Trials 45(Pt A):130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, Thalib L, Williams GM (2015b) Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: the quality effects model. Contemp Clin Trials 45(Pt A):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, Thalib L, Williams GM (2015c) Simulation comparison of the quality effects and random effects methods of meta-analysis. Epidemiology 26(4):e42–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon MA, Awaiz A, Yunus RM, Memon B, Khan S (2018) Meta-analysis of histopathological outcomes of laparoscopic assisted rectal resection (LARR) vs open rectal resection (ORR) for carcinoma. Am J Surg 216(5):1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahjahan Khan .

Appendix 9—Stata Codes for Meta-Analysis of WMD

Appendix 9—Stata Codes for Meta-Analysis of WMD

A9.1 Blood loss dataset

Study

n_larr

mean_larr

sd_larr

n_orr

mean_orr

sd_orr

study_period

Bonjer et al. (2015)

699

200

222

345

400

370

recent

Fleshman et al. (2015)

240

256.1

305.8

222

318.4

331.7

recent

Stevenson et al. (2015)

238

100

111

235

150

181.5

recent

Jeong et al. (2014)

170

200

148

170

217.5

185

recent

Ng et al. (2014)

40

141.8

500

40

361.1

623

recent

Liu et al. (2011)

98

310

96

88

380

85

recent

Lujan et al. (2009)

101

127.8

113.3

103

234.2

174.3

old

Ng et al. (2009)

76

280

500

77

337

423

old

Ng et al. (2008)

51

321.7

750

48

555.6

1188

old

Braga et al. (2007)

83

213

258

85

396

258

old

Zhou et al. (2004)

82

20

19

89

92

25

old

A9.2 Stata Codes for the Blood loss dataset

. ssc install admetan

Codes for WMD meta-analysis of blood loss

. admetan n_larr mean_larr sd_larr n_orr mean_orr sd_orr, wmd

. admetan n_larr mean_larr sd_larr n_orr mean_orr sd_orr, wmd re

. admetan n_larr mean_larr sd_larr n_orr mean_orr sd_orr, wmd ivhet

A9.3 Codes for WMD Subgroup analysis of blood loss by study period

. admetan n_larr mean_larr sd_larr n_orr mean_orr sd_orr, wmd by(study_period)

. admetan n_larr mean_larr sd_larr n_orr mean_orr sd_orr, wmd re by(study_period)

. admetan n_larr mean_larr sd_larr n_orr mean_orr sd_orr, wmd ivhet by(study_period)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khan, S. (2020). Meta-Analysis of Weighted Mean Difference. In: Meta-Analysis. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5032-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics