Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Action Research and Indigenous Research Methodologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Working Two Way

Abstract

This chapter introduces the philosophy and methodology of action research as well as introducing some other Indigenous research methodologies. Action research is a democratic and participatory way of working that is ideally suited to First Nations communities. The practical process of action research is described as a cycle of look, think and act and it is this process that provides a framework for the case studies in all the following chapters. Like action research, Indigenous research methodologies offer similar democratic and emancipatory ways of working. Like action research, they have an underlying philosophy that is respectful of Indigenous protocols, decolonises the research space and prioritises an Indigenous world view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Yolngu’ comprise several different language groups and are the Aboriginal people who inhabit Arnhem Land, or the north-eastern lands, of the Northern Territory.

  2. 2.

    NAIDOC Week celebrates the history, culture and achievements of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Events are held across Australia each July. See http://www.naidoc.org.au/.

References

  • Aikman, A. (2012, 18–19 August). Gulf scream: talk, talk, talk but no action. The Weekend Australian, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T. (2013). Being and becoming Indigenous: Resurgence against contemporary colonialism. 2013 Narrm Oration, The University of Melbourne. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwJNy-B3lPA.

  • Bessarab, D., & Forrest, S. (2017). Anggaba jini nimoonggoon: Whose knowledge is that? Aboriginal perspectives of community development. In C. Kickett-Tucker, D. Bessarab, J. Coffin, & M. Wright (Eds.), Mia Mia. Aboriginal Community Development. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessarab, D., & Ng’andu, B. (2010). Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in Indigenous research. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994). Location of culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1995). Cultural Diversity and Cultural Differences. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The postcolonial studies reader (pp. 155–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford, S. (1996). The Dissonance of Democracy. Listening, conflict and citizenship. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H. (2015). Introduction. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), Sage handbook of action research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1, 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B., & Frazer, R. (2018). Yarning circles and social activism. Media International Australia, 168(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, G. (2016). Response. Historical Materialism, 24(3), 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2008). Emancipatory Discourses and the Ethics and Politics of Interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Preface. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. California: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, J. (2013). About yarning circles. Southern Cross University. Retrieved from https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scueduau/academic-schools/-gnibi-college-of-indigenous-australian-peoples/About-Yarning-Circles-A-Guide-for-Participants.pdf.

  • Dick, B. (1997). A planned community participation activity. Resource papers in Action Research. Retrieved from http://www.aral.com.au/resources/case2.html.

  • Dick, B. (2000). A beginner’s guide to action research. Resource papers in Action Research. Retrieved from http://www.aral.com.au/resources/guide.html.

  • Dudgeon, P. (2017). Hear our voices: Community development and working with Indigenous people experiencing trauma. In C. Kickett-Tucker, D. Bessarab, J. Coffin, & M. Wright (Eds.), Mia Mia. Aboriginal Community Development. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. (2018) Indigenous resurgence: The drive for renewed engagement and reprocity in the turn away from the State. Canadian Journal of Political Science. Vol. 51. Issue 1. Cambridge University Press. pp. 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredericks, B., & Adams, K. (2011). Editorial: Decolonising action research. Action Learning Action Research Journal, 17(2), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th ed.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geia, L. K., Hayes, B., & Usher, K. (2013). Yarning/Aboriginal storytelling: Towards an understanding of an indigenous perspective and its implications for research practice. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 46(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. L. (2001). I wish this were a poem of practices of particpatory research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. (p. 173). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikas, K., & Wagner, G. (2009). Postcolonial Subjectivity and the Transclassical Logic of the Third. In K. Ikas & G. Wagner (Eds.), Communicating in the third space. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of jurgen habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. (pp. 91). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickett-Tucker, C., Bessarab, D., Coffin, J., & Wright, M. (Eds.). (2017). Mia Mia. aboriginal community development: Fostering cultural security. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M., & Greenwood, D. (2001). Pragmatic action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 103–113). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, I., Green, C., & Bessarab, D. (2016). ‘Yarn with me’: applying clinical yarning to improve clinician-patient communication in Aboriginal health car. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 22(5), 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marika-Mununggiritj, R., & Christie, M. J. (1995). Yolngu metaphors for learning. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 113(1), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marika, R. (1999). The 1998 Wentworth Lecture: Australian Aboriginal Studies 1, 3–9 retrieved from https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/presentations/1998-wentworth-marika-raymattja.pdf.

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2009). Doing and writing action research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (2014). Writing and doing action research. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, P. (1998). Hybridity in the third space: rethinking bi-cultural politics in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Paper presented at the Te Oru Rangahau Moari Research and Development Conference. Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickler, S. (1998). The myth of privilege. Fremantle: Fremantle Arts Centre Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K., Sunderland, N., & Davis-Warra, J. (2013). Yarning circles in the literacy classroom. The Reading Teacher, 67(4), 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council. (2003). Values and ethics - guidelines for ethical conduct in Aborginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Canberra: Australian Government Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e52.pdf.

  • National Health and Medical Research Council. (n.d). Historical context of research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/ethics/ethical-guidelines-research-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples.

  • Pyrch, T., & Castillo, M. T. (2001). The sights and sounds of indigenous knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 379–385). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Action Research. Participative Enquiry and Practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. (2012, 1/9/2012). ‘Indigenous exceptionalism’ bars realisation of potential. The Wekend Australian, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J. (1990). The Third Space. Interview with Homi Bhabha. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity. Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. B. (2016). Indigenous resurgence and co-resistance. Journal of the Critical Ethnic Studies Association, 2(2), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, R., & Spence, L. (1983). Colonialism, racism and representation. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (Second Edition ed., pp. 111). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. (2007). Action research. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. (2008). Action research in education. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacchi, J. (2015) ‘Ethnographic action research: Media, information and communicative ecologies for development initiatives’. In H. Bradbury (Ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (Chap. 21, pp. 220–229) SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacchi, J., Slater, D., & Hearn, G. (2003). Ethnographic action research. New Delhi: United Nations Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacchi, J. (2015b). Ethnographic action research: Media, information and communicative ecologies for developing initiatives. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research (3rd ed., pp. 220–229). London: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • The Yarning Circle. (2019). Let’s have a yarn with yarn. Retrieved from https://www.theyarningcircle.com/face-to-face/.

  • United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (n.d.). International Decades of the World’s Indigenous People Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/ipeoples/pages/internationaldecade.aspx.

  • Wright, M., & Kickett-Tucker, C. (2017). Djinangingy kaartdijin: Seeing and understanding our ways of working. In C. Kickett-Tucker, D. Bessarab, J. Coffin, & M. Wright (Eds.), Mia Mia. Aboriginal Community Development - Fostering cultural security (pp. 153–168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yungaporta, T. (2019). Sand talk. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerrit, O., & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis in social sciences. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(4), 413–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Humanities, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia

    Michelle Johnston

  2. Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia

    Simon Forrest

Authors
  1. Michelle Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Forrest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Johnston .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johnston, M., Forrest, S. (2020). Action Research and Indigenous Research Methodologies. In: Working Two Way. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4913-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4913-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4912-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4913-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation