Advertisement

Comparison of Bio-inspired Algorithms Applied to the Hospital Mortality Risk Stratification

Conference paper
First Online:
  • 179 Downloads
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 181)

Abstract

The construction of patient classification (or risk adjustment) systems allows comparison of the effectiveness and quality of hospitals and hospital services, providing useful information for management decision making and management of hospitals. Risk adjustment systems to stratify patients’ severity in a clinical outcome are generally constructed from care variables and using statistical techniques based on logistic regression (RL). The objective of this investigation is to compare the hospital mortality prediction capacity of an artificial neural network (RNA) with other methods already known.

Keywords

Hospital mortality Risk stratification Intensive care unit Artificial neural networks Bootstrap 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Sargent, D.J.: Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches results from medical data sets. Cancer 91, 1636–1642 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bifet, A., De Morales, G. F: Big data stream learning with Samoa. Recuperado de (2014). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282303881_Big_data_stream_learning_with_SAMOA
  3. 3.
    Clermont, G., Angus, D.C., DiRusso, S.M., Griffin, M., Linde-Zwirble, W.T.: Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: A comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models. Crit. Care Med. 29, 291–296 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wong, L.S.S., Young, J.D.: A comparison of ICU mortality prediction using the APACHE II scoring system and artificial neural network. Anaesthesia 54, 1048–1054 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bravo, M., Alvarado, M.: Similarity measures for substituting web services. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 7(3), 1–29 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Song, Z.L., Miao, Z.: Automatic web services classification based on rough set theory. J. Cental South Univ. 20, 2708–2714 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Viloria, A., Lezama, O. B. P: Improvements for determining the number of clusters in k-means for innovation databases in SMEs. ANT/EDI40, pp 1201–1206 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viloria, A., Lis-Gutiérrez J. P., Gaitán-Angulo, M., Godoy, A. R. M., Moreno, G. C., Kamatkar, S. J.: Methodology for the design of a student pattern recognition tool to facilitate the teaching—Learning process through knowledge data discovery (big data). In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Tang, Q. (eds.) Data Mining and Big Data. DMBD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10943. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu, J., Fang, X. et al.: IBM cloud computing powering a smarter planet. In: Libro Cloud Computing, vol. 599.51, pp 621– 625 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohanty, R., Ravi, V., Patra, M.R.: Web-services classification using intelligent techniques. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(7), 5484–5490 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thames, L., Schaefer, D.: Software defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Procedía CIRP 52, 12–17 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Álvarez, M., Nava, J.M., Rue, M., Quintana, S.: Mortality prediction in head trauma patients: Performance of glasgow coma score and general severity systems. Crit. Care Med. 26, 142–148 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Setnes, M., Kaymak, U.: Fuzzy modeling of client preference from large data sets: an application to target selection in direct marketing. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9(1), 153–163 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Llorca, J., Dierssen, T.: Comparación de dos métodos para el cálculo de la incertidumbre en los análisis de laboratorio. Gac. Sanit. 14, 458–463 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Viloria, A., Neira-Rodado, D., Pineda Lezama, O. B.: Recovery of scientific data using intelligent distributed data warehouse. ANT/EDI40, pp 1249–1254 (2019)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu, Q., Yan, H. S., Yang, H. B.: A forecasting model based support vector machine and particle swarm optimization. In: 2008 Workshop on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System, pp. 218–222 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Peruana de Ciencias AplicadasLimaPeru
  2. 2.Universidad Simón BolívarBarranquillaColombia
  3. 3.Universidad de La Costa (CUC)BarranquillaColombia
  4. 4.Universidad Tecnológica Centroamericana (UNITEC)San Pedro SulaHonduras
  5. 5.Corporación Universitaria Minute de Dios. UNIMINUTOBarranquillaColombia
  6. 6.Corporación Universitaria LatinoamericanaBarranquillaColombia

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options